modern fashion unwearable?

jovana

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050118/people_nm/retail_cardin_dc_3


By Caroline Brothers


PARIS (Reuters) - Modern clothes are unwearable and the fashion industry has been disfigured by big business and nudity, says legendary designer Pierre Cardin.


Reuters Photo


In an interview at his offices overlooking the French presidential palace, Cardin said true haute couture, the French phrase for the most exclusive work produced by a big fashion house, had vanished.



Haute couture dresses and outfits are sewn by hand and to the specific measurements of the client, ensuring something unique, the exact opposite of mass produced ready-to-wear.



"You no longer have the construction of a real silhouette. Before you had Balenciaga, Chanel, Courreges, Cardin ... Of these names, yes Dior still exists, but it's spectacle. It's superb, but it's a spectacle," said 82-year-old Cardin, one of France's last great fashion icons.



"You can't walk in shoes like that or hats like that -- to go where? You go to dinner and you need three chairs to sit down," said Cardin, who joined the Dior atelier in 1946 and shot to fame with his "bubble dress" in 1954.



"Intelligent women work nowadays, they drive cars, and the cars are smaller and smaller, while the dresses at Dior are bigger and bigger. It's very beautiful, but it's not fashion -- it's something else. It's costume."



Cardin was talking to Reuters about his 65 years in fashion as he considers offers for his $1.32 billion empire, which he recently put up for sale.



A U.N. peace ambassador who is also the only couturier in the prestigious institute that protects French culture, Cardin reflected on his career.



"I was very lucky. I was part of the post-war period when everything had to be redone. Women wanted to party, to dance, to amuse themselves; there was a sexy side. But now nudity is everywhere, sex is everywhere," he said.



"We undress men and women, we don't dress them any more."



As for the thirst for labels that drove fashion giants like LVMH and Pinault Printemps Redoute into battle for control of Gucci, Cardin said a true couture house needed a true creator behind it.



"Gucci began as a suitcase with a stripe, (film maker Luchino) Visconti gave me one. I knew Monsieur Gucci, the grandfather. That's not the name of a creator," Cardin said.



"It's like a photographer who is a big name, like Henri Cartier-Bresson. Who would buy "Cartier-Bresson" and use it as a name?" he said.



"That is what has happened in fashion; we have completely disfigured this profession that was once very creative."



Master of a realm that spans everything from men's suits to the Maxim's restaurant concern, Cardin said it is now nearly impossible for a young couturier to make a mark.



"When I began in 1945 there were about 20 creators round the world. Today there are hundreds, everywhere, internationally. But there is practically no more fashion," said Cardin.







"If I were 20 I wouldn't know what to do because practically everything has been done."

But the man who has kept one step ahead of the fashion world for most of his career -- bringing runway shows to department stores in 1959 and couture to communist China in 1975 -- was also the first to take fashion to the street with ready-to-wear.

"IT WILL KILL YOUR NAME"

"They said pret-a-porter will kill your name and it saved me," he said.

Cardin was also the first to take the controversial step of licensing his label to an outside manufacturer.

"When I agreed my first license 45 years ago it was an enormous risk. People said no one would be talking about Pierre Cardin in two years and they were quite wrong -- those were the words of Dior and Saint-Laurent. The only one who is alive today and still being talked about is Pierre Cardin," he said.

Cardin's embrace of licensing -- when third parties manufacture items under a designer's name -- is anathema to much of today's luxury trade which admits only to farming out production of sunglasses, perfumes or jeans.

But Cardin, who built his empire without borrowing a single franc, defended his approach; his Pierre Cardin trademark now supports 900 licenses across 140 countries.

"I have a name, I have to take advantage of it," he said.

Ironically though, licensing has shut most Cardin boutiques; he now sells mainly through department and duty-free stores.

"I had 27 boutiques around the world at the time of (former French President Charles) de Gaulle, but we closed them because it bothered licensees. They said: you are competing with us."

Cardin applied the logic he used to expand his Pierre Cardin label to Maxim's, the Paris restaurant whose brand he has "stretched" across 800 licenses from chocolates to watches and pens. The restaurant appealed to him as a place for going out wearing stylish fashion and jewels.

Critics have turned up their noses, arguing that licensing devalues a brand, but Cardin may yet have the last laugh.

The designer, who reckons Maxim's and his couture interests are each worth at least 500 million euros, said he so far received 20 offers for his fashion empire.

"It's worth much more than that. It's the price of desire."






 
I'm quite confused. I don't understand his criticisms against spectacle in fashion and how much fashion is devalued in modern times when he has over 900 licenses. At the end of the day, do not all roads lead to Rome? They're all just trying to make money. If I had the waist for Dior, I'd feel like a queen at Per Se in New York eating truffles while sitting on three chairs.
 
It does seem a little bit hypocritical. I think what he says about couture is right though.
 
The fashions haven't changed, just the social conditions. When society ladies spent their lives going to balls in their limousines, big hair and big dresses were pretty practical...
 
Thanks for the article jovana :flower:

Interesting article...I know it's all spectacle and all, but that's only the shows...the real work is done later on (not saying that the Dior shows arent real work), just look at Charlize's dress at the Golden Globes...gorgeous piece of couture. And fashion is not dead, it is just different than it was 50 years ago, that's something I expected Monsieur Cardin would have realised. And another thing, somehow this article smells like a big advert for monday's Dior show...as if the show is gonna be 'true haute couture' like Cardin said it himself and that this article is gonna make people think that Dior is the best next tuesday, cause he said so...See what I am saying?
 
I agree with all comments before me. Thanks for the article, Jovana. Very interesting reading...
 
I disagree with the couture statements as I love the overdone costumes - they are fun as hell. But I absolutely agree with his comments on modern fashion and how there is 'nothing left to do'. I too think that modern designs are misguided and we don't have much left to explore.

Smart man.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,706
Messages
15,234,185
Members
87,564
Latest member
mcnifficent
Back
Top