Naomi Preizler | Page 16 | the Fashion Spot

Naomi Preizler

Photographed by Robert Nethery
Fashion Editor: Johnathan Lawhorne
Casting and Production: Heather Catania
Hair: Luke Baker at See Management
Make-Up: Deanna Melluso for NARS at Artlist New York
Photo Assistant: Joe Falcone
Model: Naomi Preizler at NEXT



thecontributingeditor.com

Wonderland Magazine November/December 2010 by Vicky Trombetta
Styled by Julia Sarr Jamois



myfdb
 
New interview:



Fashion icon in-the-making. Cosmopolitan. Budding artist. And she’s still a teenager. Naomi Preizler has been on the world stage for just over a year now, and has already walked for Issey Miyake, Sonya Rykiel, Maison Martin Margiela, Chanel, Gaultier, and Josep Font (and the illustrious list goes on). The Buenos Aires native is a model of the finest class, and simply oozes substance, intelligence, culture and sophistication, to boot. Inspired by her sketches, our Vicky Trombetta even shot her for the current issue of Wonderland. We get deep with Naomi in a long conversation about her place in the world, her view on the state of fashion and her role as subject and object of art.


What came first? Modeling or painting? And how did you make your way into each one?
I was born into an artistic family; my father’s an architect and my grandmother an artist, so they’ve encouraged since I was born. I’ve been drawing and painting since I was very little. I was also into wearing my mom’s accessories, and when I grew older I developed a huge interest in fashion, buying Italian Vogues and becoming familiar with the good designers. Plus my grandmother had an amazing wardrobe, and lots of its pieces belong to me now…
When I was 14 I was scouted by a local agent in Buenos Aires. I didn’t have any interest, but when I heard names like Versace and Chanel and cities like New York and Paris I started to keep an eye on it. I kept it slow until I graduated from high school and by then would travel to London first. I always wanted to go abroad and modeling was my perfect opportunity. Of course I couldn’t avoid being influenced by fashion at the beginning. And thanks to fashion I have something to say. And thanks to fashion I achieved lots of knowledge living alone abroad. I think sometimes that maybe I could still be stuck in Buenos Aires trying to find something to say…

You’ve said on your blog that “the figure is being modeled.” Essentially you are the figure being modeled when you’re working. How do you translate your artistic intuition and your painting into your modeling work?
Well I actually said that because the word “model” means a lot of things. I don’t like to call myself a model and I think that that word is misused for that profession. Because a “model” is something that should be followed because of its perfection. If somebody asks me what I do, I say that I work in fashion…
I’ve discovered a lot by looking at myself in the mirror and experiencing what my figure goes through while on set. I recently shot an editorial where I was pretending to be my own drawings styled in the 1920’s (I’m obsessed with that era). And I really understood then how bones bend and the muscles tense with different torsions and body expressions. So I could say I felt my figure being modeled by me.

How have your life’s recent, drastic changes affected you?
When I studied theatre the task I enjoyed the most was improvisation. It’s pretty much what happens in life. Things come and go unexpectedly. But when something goes away it leaves space for other things to come into our lives. In mine, in a model’s everyday life, this occurs very often. Opportunities and bookings and trips and contacts…

Do you have any formal art training? What made you first pick up a brush?
I became heavily interested in art as a teenager, through reading my dad’s art books. When I started traveling abroad I discovered, by going to all the big museums and exhibitions, how much I loved art, artists and movements. Later, I took classes with different artists. When I became established in NY, I started attending a non-formal art school. First The New York Academy of Art and now I’m attending The Artists Students League of NY, which is a great place where very important artists have discovered themselves, like Litchenstein and Rothko and Pollock… I’m like a sponge and absorb everything I see and hear. The atmosphere during an art class is very encouraging and deep and completely different than backstage! (Laughs)

The painting and artistic expression – is this something just for you, personal moments of release? Or would you like to expand and change lanes, and ride in the artists’ saddle?
I paint when I feel like it or when I’ve got free time, because it fulfills me, and this job requires balance. Because sometimes you are rejected, and I myself feel the need to grab a pencil and sketch something on a sheet of paper and say “I was good in the end”… I would carry my sketchbook everywhere as a means of expression; it’s like a catharsis. If I don’t have it with me I would pretend I’m drawing the situation on air to memorize that vision.
And of course, I love the idea of showing people that I can do something other modeling. People are very surprised sometimes when they discover I have some deeper talent…

What runs through your mind after you have created something on a canvas?
It’s literally the same feeling that I have after an orgasm, pleased and proud. If I’m not pleased with what I’ve done I tend to not throw it out, because in the end it was something that my unconscious wanted to express and I can’t reject it… After I’ve fixed the first lines and shapes on the canvas I stop for a long time and sit and stare and walk around and stare it again and maybe go out and when I come back I’ve already achieved the next piece to add. Because a painting is not an instant, it is a whole process.

Which artists do you admire or feel you identify closely with?
Basically the expressionists from the 20’s like Edvard Munch, Otto Dix, Kokoshka and Egon Schiele. I love Schiele most; he was a deep pessimist and dark character. His career was very short so we can’t really see his improvement like Picasso, but still with no money to buy materials he still found a way to express his very particular view of humanity. I also admire Lucian Freud, because of how he paints flesh on the body; Monet for the his drastic addition to art history. I love the woman as heroine that Rubens set out; David Hockney’s architectural sets; Marlene Dumas and Elizabeth Peyton as the 90’s figurative art revival; Banksy and Basquiat’s philosophies…

Painting, theatre, modeling – what else do you do that we don’t know about?
Nothing is enough for me! When they ask me the typical “What do you want to be when you grow up?” question, I don’t know where to start. In the beginning I loved dancing and wanted to be a ballerina; so there you’ve got something more: dancing. Basically anything related to expression. I like writing as well.

Do you feel that life is its own theatre stage? Which role do you play? And everyone else? Are they spectators or participators?
Yes it is, like the Improvisation task of drama school. If you try to follow a script you will fail. Life is not written. I’m just a student who enters on the sets of different people and then receives other issues and new characters onto my stage. We are all part of the play. We are all part of that system and life is a system which sometimes works as we want it to and sometimes doesn’t, and needs new pieces, new characters, new situations, to keep on working at the same speed that the world around us moves. And sometimes it stops working forever.

Do you live by any particular adage?
My father uses very often quotes from the Torah to refer to different life situations. The one that sticks with me the most is: “If I am not for myself, who will be? And when I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?” (Hillel Hazaquen, 110 CE-10 CE).

Who are ‘the fantastic four’ featured on your blog? Are those your designs? What sparked those drawings?
I was in Milan during Fashion Week after a bad casting day, I felt the need to create my own designs. I was going through so many different fashion houses watching them do their thing and said to myself “I can do what I want as well”. So I did it. I drew four different figures with my four favorite looks that I always end up wearing.
Sometimes I would read these cheap magazines where they dictate to you the trend of the moment as if you were a marionette manipulated by the, in this case, fashion business ($$€€££). So I added funny ironic notes next to each look like “Hold your breath for the revival of the 1800s corset and feel a lady again. Where have all those gentlemen gone?” or in the Detail Section, things like “The briefcase: I’m already wearing my dad’s one and believe me, you can take your whole Mac cosmetic collection with you!” (Laughs) That’s consumerism!

You are an exceptionally talented individual. Is there something that is missing right now in your life? Something you’d like to pursue?
Talent! There’s not a limit, you are always achieving new things and developing your knowledge and life experience. My own is very very little right now in comparison with my entire future lifetime. In the end, I would like to feel I’ve lived life the best way I could have.

Everyone is tired of the superficiality and is hungry for what is real and raw, the people and things that they can relate to. What do you think will be the future of modeling and the fashion industry? What would you say is missing?
Fashion people are not the problem. We see fashion as a reflection of society. So it’s the society that’s in charge of moving business, because cause in the end fashion’s client is society.
There’s a lot of junk information surrounding us, propaganda. And then comes fashion to reiterate the same. I don’t mean by this by the clothes themselves, but in the way business moves, how people interact. In any case, I’ve met some amazing artistic, fashionable minds and thanks to them I’ve ended up thinking of fashion as a means of expression. People then choose to buy it or not. That’s the way it should be; we should be able to choose what we truly believe in with no one to convince and confuse us of our original vision. Fashion’s future depends only and exclusively on us, society.

What is your spiritual reality?
My “external me” may be classified in a group of others with the same tag. My “internal me” is the one willing to break that tag. So it’s a constant fight between soul and body, thoughts and extension. Most of the time we think unconsciously but act consciously. That’s why I agree with Rothko and Basquiat that the childhood is such an important process of life because as a child we don’t have inhibitions in expressing what we want, and should be encouraged not to loose that naïve, unconscious way of acting. The final goal is that my thoughts gain more control over my extension. We are a dual being and I try my best to find an understanding between both sides and identification. That’s when I reach a purer self…

There's no way you can resist Naomi after reading this interview. No way. She's inspirational, and proves wrong all those who think all models are airheads who get to climb the ladder just because they epitomize an ideal beauty to look up to. And just as a reminder, you can check out Naomi's paintings on her blog.

2dmblogazine.it
 
I totally agree with you Carla, Naomi is expetionally smart. Same to Tati Cotliar, there must be something in the air in Argentina.


Talking about interviews, nijuyanah conducted one with her and Iris Strubegger for a German fashion mag not too long ago - if anybody interested to read, just let me know and I'll scan it. :flower:
 
What an incredible interview she gave above, I'm almost speechless by her rail of thought, her eloquence and the speed in which she seems to understand and connect to everything, from the industry she works in to her own role in life. This is actually the second interview I've read by this girl that leaves me spinning :lol:.. and it's one of the reasons why I occasionally visit this thread, just to check what else she's said.
I confess I've never been a fan of her beauty (judging her exclusively as a model) but when you learn more about her personality, it all makes sense.. all of her features make up what's so interesting, intriguing and beautiful about her.

I cannot wait to see more of her personal work.. :heart:
 
Here you go guys.. Sorry, ignore the misspelling, it's the unedited version i couldn't find the edited one, anymore.


What fascinates you about Rosa Luxemburg - I mean, she lived a short life always walking on knife's edge which was quite common for political rebels during the area of proletarian internationalism - Does today's society depend on such rebels?
When I’ve studied about the revolutions during such periods on Germany at school, there was this polish origin female character that remained on my mind; I felt a fascination about her ideals self-trust and fighting for them till the end of her short life. Though there were many self-heroic rebels, her name stands out of the mass cause she was a woman, which was unusual during the 1910’s. It’s not that I agree with her views, or with her communist ideas, but I rather kept this “going on spirit no matter what”. I’m not saying by this that we all should be extremism in what we want to change, but the whole idea of auto determination in what we pursue in life. She was decisive; and is hard to be decisive nowadays with all the superficial propaganda that surrounds us in the modern world.

Rosa Luxemburgo was a Marxist revolutionary who took participation during the failed revolution of 1919 in Berlin, and was murdered by then. This is an extremism example that I recall on everybody because, as I wrote on my blog about the “spiritual freedom”, her body had belonged to the system but her soul and thoughts were exclusively hers. So in the end I blame modern society for trying to confuse us and our pure person; but if we look back in history and stay with Rosa’s model example we learn that we may be part of this social system but our inner person is what can change and fight the “repression”. And I don’t mean revolutions and wars (something typically of that period) but the actual “material wars”.

There was a review I also wrote on my blog, sometime ago, about Christian Boltanski’s “Personnes”, where pieces of cloth were pilled up on a mountain waiting weakly to be picked by a crane. It was their destiny and they couldn’t do anything about it, but if they were not just single pieces of cloth, if they were wore by persons, they would have had a spirit to fight idyllically against the mechanic destiny.

To conclude, what I’m saying by all this is that we wouldn’t want to be just single pieces of cloth “waiting to be picked” and waiting for the system to pursue the destiny they want for us, because I don’t believe in such thing. Rosa is our ego, our maximum goal, and our model of freedom. We can’t be free with our body, but is our mind that keep us loyal to our originally essence. As Descartes said “The human body is mechanic, but the man has as well a soul which can act freely in relation with the body”.


Is it worth to risk life for an either religion-moral & political matter or even freedom? Nowadays, it seems like "surviving" and "protecting" against any kind of danger even if it's "just" sickness is highest priority while those who risk something for a particular matter like Rosa did are considered depressed or mad.

It is for me. It is for people like me that support the idea of pursuing happiness and stability with their inner freedom. And Rosa was free after all, because as I said before, our body will never be ours but is our mind that should act devoted to our thoughts and ideas.

Nobody can tell you weather you are doing the right or the wrong thing. There are two kinds of rights: the good that you do to please the most people you can or the one that you do to satisfy yourself. The first right is a bit ambitious and is the government mostly in charge of taking care of it. But is the second one that we have to focus on (as long as it doesn’t imply doing the wrong on other people).

And, how does the Judaism deal with this topic?

There was this Jewish wise man, who live from 110 BCE to 10 CE, called Hillel Hazaquen (Hillel was his name and Hazaquen means “the old man”). He said this: “If I am not for myself, who will be? And when I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?” "That which is hateful to you do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn."



'The Jerut of Rose Luxemburgo'. Generally speaking, what is your vision?

The Jerut means freedom in Hebrew, and to sum up the first two answers, Rosa Luxemburgo was free to the maximum aloud cause she chose to dye devoted to her idea and didn’t fall into the capitalism cleaning minds. Isn’t it weird that my drawings are mostly women? Naked, melancholic, body expressionists. I didn’t plan to end up materializing this, but maybe subconsciously they want to be like Rosa…




We would say that your artworks are characteristic for the expressionism period, do you agree with us? If not, which art peroid would you classify your imagery to be a part of?
I’m a European 20s culturally obsessed and regarding to art I was always into Schiele’s Austrian expressionism. We could say that the Norwegian Edvard Munch was the pioneer of painting from the interior, from what the artist feels, from what he is going through. It’s not to show to the others what he thinks or feel, it’s not to impress but to express yourself, some kind of self therapy; when I draw is when I only feel I’m disconnected with the world and focused on my inner spirit. Is to express a vision rather that materializing the reality. And adding something more about this movement, the expressionism supports the individual freedom. ‘I’m free to write, paint and say what I want. It’s the “inner me” who’s expressing after all.’

I’ve had some more realistic technical painting, but the most difficult task in every artist is to go back to the unconscious expressionist kid we once were. My art is I and only I.



When you start creating a painting, do you follow a strict concept or vision.... or do you go by your mood trusting your emotions?
I do both. Sometimes I have and idea for a while from something I see or read or experience and materialize it on the canvas, composing the paint and the characters in it. Sometimes I feel nostalgic or melancholic or whatever feeling and grab a pencil or charcoal or watercolors and make a quick unconscious draw on a sheet of paper. I only realize what I’ve done after when I take a reflecting look at them.



Looking at your model colleagues - If you had pick one of them to fit your vision, who would that be?

I’ve known Valerija Kelava for a while from when she was starting in Paris. It’s amazing how she remained the same and didn’t change her visions and humble thoughts after all the success she has gained. It’s herself for everybody no matter who they are; she’ll always be Valerija from Slovenia. ‘If you like her take her, if you don’t she won’t change to fit you.’
 
I'm not surprised because I knew she was very intelligent but always is a pleasure read that she says. I love her!
 
Naomi's interviews are definitely absorbing reads. Thanks for sharing that piece. :heart:

Metal Magazine #22 by Aingeru Zorita
Styled by Rayna Cummings



fashiongonerogue
 
i like her even more, that's interesting and inspiring seeing someone opinionated and talented that young, though probably having an artistic family background doesn't hurt :p
i'll keep an eye on her blog from now!

her printwork is so good recently since that appearance in that blonde ambition editorial (:
 
sebhcv54t8xtpjlgbk4.jpg


streetpeeper
 
very very very beautiful! I think she must wear more blue It seems so nice with her yellow hair
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,330
Messages
15,297,035
Members
89,282
Latest member
downstream
Back
Top