I don't take anything Lambert says as negative towards Natalie...he was a good friend of her's for years having met her and hit it off when he wrote "Inside Daisy Clover" although prior that he had been Nicholas Ray's asst. and Nicholas Ray while directing "Rebel Without a Cause" famously was rumoured to have had an affair with young Natalie. From wikipedia:
In 1957 he moved to Hollywood, California, in order to work there as a screenwriter and personal assistant to director Nicholas Ray, whose movie Bitter Victory (1957) he co-wrote. He claimed he became Ray's lover for a period of time.
So perhaps, he knew her more than you think!
Also from wikipedia:
His final biography, Natalie Wood: A Life (2004) supplied an insider's look at actress Natalie Wood and chronicled everything concerning her life, as Lambert was a Wood friend for 16 years.The book was praised by Natalie Wood's daughter, Natasha Gregson Wagner, as "a wonderful biography on my Mom. It will be the definitive biography on my mother." Lambert's biography includes Wood's relationship with Elvis Presley, interviews with the people who knew Wood best, such as Robert Wagner, Warren Beatty, Paul Mazursky, and Leslie Caron. In his book, Lambert controversially claimed that Wood frequently dated gay and bisexual men, including director Nicholas Ray and actors Nick Adams, Raymond Burr, James Dean, Tab Hunter and Scott Marlowe. Lambert said he was also involved with Ray and that Wood supported homosexual playwright Mart Crowley (a later lover of Lambert's) in a manner that made it possible for him to write his play, The Boys in the Band (1968).
sounds like Natalie was more open-minded and ahead of her time than most in the 50's early 60's
Of course, I agree, no book can fully capture anyone's full vibrancy but I think a good friend who knew and loved someone and spent time with them can come closer than someone who is just going off their own research having never met the person. Of course, sometimes they tend to "protect" the subject a bit more from criticism which Lambert was said by some to do. Natasha did approve this book and said it is the definitive bio on her mom.
Natalie as far as anything I have ever heard or read and I have read alot over the years was a very sexual being and was no innocent.
Nothing wrong with that in my book
let me say this....i have been told by someone who worked with natalie for 17 years that lambert and natalie were not as close as he claimed.....but that's beside the point. the aspect of this book that i did not like was the fact that he used it to dust off some of the dirt that was thrown on rj by suzanne finstad in her "natasha"...and in doing so...he sacrificed natalie...he seemed intent on making rj look good...too much so....it seemed that rj was looking over lambert's shoulder. i don't believe that was the case but to the average reader that was the impression that was given....read the amazon reviews. also, natasha made that statement before she read the book... a better book could be written by someone who was more objective. lambert showed no objectivity toward rj....and i am by no means saying that natalie was innocent..she was a very sexual woman..way ahead of her time...i ,too , have been reading about natalie for a very long time. she liked men...men liked her... that is not what i am referring to when i tell people not to believe what they read...but there have been many things that have been written about her that are not true or exaggerated...i have been following natalie's life for 40 years. there is a lot of contradictions...