Tatler March 2013 : Leah Weller

[honeycombchild]

Metro.co.uk

 

[Deleted member 1957]

I dont know about that cover....something is not working

 

[Nymphaea]

She looks like a doll, not real.

 

[honeycombchild]

She's been Photoshopped to within an inch of her life.

 

[rox_yr_sox]

Dear god, I am sick of these "child ofs" filling up covers and editorials (and films). No one would give two hoots about any of them and their negligible talent and/or looks if it wasn't for their family name.

Though, at least if we have to have them, can they some how be rounded up and kept for exclusive use by Tatler, the most appropriate place for nepotism, so we don't have see them anywhere else.

 

[ChristyLeReveur]

Not a very attractive cover... that hairdo is awful... so is the eye make-up. Ew.

 

[justaguy]

Don't like anything o this cover, just too fake.

 

[GlamorousBoy]

boring

 

[tigerrouge]

Two more shots from the cover story (dailymail.co.uk). From time to time, I buy Tatler at the end of the month when there's a 'get it for £1' voucher in the Daily Mail, but even at that value, I don't find much worth reading.

Being a society magazine shouldn't stop anyone from being able to produce stunning imagery that would attract a good audence. After all, under certain editors, Tatler produced amazing content. and really captured the mood of the time.