UK Harper’s Bazaar April 2022 : Harris Reed by Philip Sinden

[vogue28]

Special cover for the V&A museum:

 

[KoV]

Oh it’s special alright.

 

[Zorka]

Oh it’s special alright.

It's REALLY special, indeed!

 

[vogue28]

And the main cover is a reprint from American Harper's Bazaar with Venus and Serena Williams. My subscription just arrived and I'm devastated. Ugh!

 

[tigerrouge]

Because there's nothing yet on social media, I went to ebay to see a shot of the cover, I see Ruth Wilson is also in this issue, which sounds like a missed opportunity to see a British actress on the cover that we don't see that much of.

 

[liberty33r1b]

Sorry but no thanks

 

[dior_couture1245]

All these talentless, mediocre tweens....rising to the top because they're "fluid" or whatever.

I'm so ready for us to put to bed the concept of a Youthquake. Time for the grown ups to take charge again. Kids don't know anything, anyway. I'm beginning to see more and more value in the old fashioned "children should be seen, not heard," adage. And in this particular instance, I'd prefer neither to see or hear from this person again. Ever.

This person is so unattractive, tacky and clueless - it's insane.

 

[Horizontina]

It's a collectors' edition. Imagine collecting this.

 

[Zorka]

All these talentless, mediocre tweens....rising to the top because they're "fluid" or whatever.

I'm so ready for us to put to bed the concept of a Youthquake. Time for the grown ups to take charge again. Kids don't know anything, anyway. I'm beginning to see more and more value in the old fashioned "children should be seen, not heard," adage. And in this particular instance, I'd prefer neither to see or hear from this person again. Ever.

This person is so unattractive, tacky and clueless - it's insane.

giphy

 

[SLFC]

The content is okay, but I see no problem with the subject themselves.

 

[[Piece Of Me]]

All these talentless, mediocre tweens....rising to the top because they're "fluid" or whatever.

I'm so ready for us to put to bed the concept of a Youthquake. Time for the grown ups to take charge again. Kids don't know anything, anyway. I'm beginning to see more and more value in the old fashioned "children should be seen, not heard," adage. And in this particular instance, I'd prefer neither to see or hear from this person again. Ever.

This person is so unattractive, tacky and clueless - it's insane.

Harris Reed is 25, hardly a kid. And once again, can you please stop being so rude and ignorant? You may not like someone, totally fine, but calling someone "unattractive, tacky and clueless" is just totally unacceptable.

 

[Deleted member 1957]

Only thing I like about the cover are the colours, the half gown half pants combo with those shoes looks very dated

 

[mikel]

All these talentless, mediocre tweens....rising to the top because they're "fluid" or whatever.

I'm so ready for us to put to bed the concept of a Youthquake. Time for the grown ups to take charge again. Kids don't know anything, anyway. I'm beginning to see more and more value in the old fashioned "children should be seen, not heard," adage. And in this particular instance, I'd prefer neither to see or hear from this person again. Ever.

This person is so unattractive, tacky and clueless - it's insane.

Wow, the constant bigotry of it all. This forum has sunk so low. And that people are applauding these kind of opinions is baffling to me. I need to use the ingore button more.

 

[tigerrouge]

I'm sure the ignore button is a useful feature, but a hard part of accepting people's differences is accepting that different views will always exist.

Remaining aware of other's views, being open to hearing the opinions of others, and being resilient enough to accept disagreement will naturally exist does take work in a world where social media has led to low-effort interaction becoming the norm.

 

[Kite]

I got my Issue today, Its Serena and Venus, like the US cover.

 

[mikel]

I'm sure the ignore button is a useful feature, but a hard part of accepting people's differences is accepting that different views will always exist.

Remaining aware of other's views, being open to hearing the opinions of others, and being resilient enough to accept disagreement will naturally exist does take work in a world where social media has led to low-effort interaction becoming the norm.

To a certain extent I absolutely agree. But I don’t see why we have to put up with a constant stream of bigotry, racism, body shaming, victim shaming or ableism.

 

[Zorka]

To a certain extent I absolutely agree. But I don’t see why we have to put up with a constant stream of bigotry, racism, body shaming, victim shaming or ableism.

Dear @mikel, God knows how much I adore you and respect you as a member of this - no matter what other people think! - STILL amazing community.

Personally, I have *NOTHING* - on contrary! - against LGBTQ+ people, ALL other races, f̶a̶t̶/̶o̶b̶e̶s̶e̶ PLUS SIZE people, victims (although, as someone with a Master's Degrees in Psychology I can certainly recognise all sorts of victims and perfectly distinguish the real victims from "victims"!), and ESPECIALLY a people with disabilities. (Each to their own, right?)

However, I can't stand nowadays world's HYPOCRISY which - oh, WHY this doesn't surprise me?!! - started in US and then spread on the vast majority of the world like some kind of contagious disease!

Because all the above mentioned people is USED by fashion industry (to the greatest possible extent by fashion magazines!) just for the sake of a pure OPPORTUNISM, wrapping it in a foil of some kind of virtual equality, diversity, and inclusion which (still) does't exist in the real world. Namely, two weeks ago I've been in Paris and, as always when I'm there, I visited my favourite shops on Triangle d'Or and Rue Saint-Honoré (particularly: Dior, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Valentino, Prada, Chanel, Givenchy, Saint Laurent and Hermès). And guess WHO (the same way as 20 years ago!) spends the most money there? A white/thin people and Middle East people in chadors, niqabs, and/or hijabs.

 

[dior_couture1245]

You may not like someone, totally fine, but calling someone "unattractive, tacky and clueless" is just totally unacceptable.

Even if they are legitimately all three things?

Can you also explain how it’s ok to not like someone, but it’s “totally unacceptable” to explain why you don’t like them? Lol.

 

[honeycombchild]

Simply put, all three of the above are opinions presented as facts. They are insults.

In my eyes no one has any justification to ever call anyone unattractive. Dislike someone because their opinion is against your belief system, dislike someone because of something they have done that you don’t agree with. To dislike someone because you don’t think them ‘pretty’? Pathetic.

I barely post or check these forums now and this really is the prime example of why.

 

[Zorka]

CHROMATIC SCALE
Photography: Erik Madigan Heck
Styling: Leith Clark
Hair: Hiroshi Matsushita
Make-up: Kate Lee
Model: Wang Han



UK Harper's Bazaar Digital Edition