Nobody at this magazine seems to understand how to crop a beauty cover. Their close-ups are almost always too close. I wonder if it's not a photographer problem as well because I don't recall Lindbergh's beauty covers to looking like this, neither Emilia Clarke's, fairly recently.
I do like the colours used, but it looks garish and overdone instead of artistic or glamorous. Image should definitely be zoomed out more. It also could be someone else, really. But Harper's is the only magazine where Rihanna moves a decent amount of newsstand copies, so at least her appearance makes sense here. What I will say about all the Fenty covers I've seen is that they NEVER sell you 'soap and water' type of beauty. It always looks......interesting, at least. Like a Dior under Galliano beauty campaign.
What is interesting is that you have Vogue plugging KKW Beauty, and now Harper's for Fenty. Very soon the success of these celebrity brands, all thanks to social media, will force the industry to legitimise them. If they haven't been already. It's no longer like the fashion industry can afford to turn up their noses like they've done with L.A.M.B. or JLo. Because at the time those two were not really associated or fully embraced by the industry. Not the way Rihanna and Kim have been. And therein lies the reason why Kylie Jenner, despite her so called multimillion empire, she still can't secure a Vogue or even a measly Bazaar cover.