Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process.
More info here
I know right! But she consistently sells better than other legit actors and she's always mentioned in the year-end circulation notes about best-sellers...
The issue of Glamour (think it was Glamour...) she covered last year was the issue's biggest selling issue, by far. There's an article in the Business of Fashion thread about how reality and TV stars are becoming the biggest pull to readers. She's clearly still relevant as people must still wish to read about her, more so than most movie actresses it would seem!
Lauren is not on tabloids every week like the Kardashians so when she's on a magazine I tend to want to read it to see what's going on in her life. She goes about her business so much more quietly.
(1,2,3) Dress $2,343, Fausto Puglisi; Bracelet price upon request, Pomellato; Ring $3,350, Cartier (4) Swimsuit $595, Emilio Pucci at The Paper Bag Princess; Sunglasses $450, The Row; Hinge cuff $170, Miansai by Michael Saiger; Smooth bangles from $550, Double bracelet $850, Maiyet (5) Shirt $268, Paper Crown; Bra and briefs prices upon request, Alessandro Dell'Acqua at New York Vintage; Wide bangles from $425, Georg Jensen; Double bracelet $265, Campbell; Square cuff $250, Jennifer Fisher; Shoes $895, Brian Atwood marieclaire.com
Yikes, they've chosen the worst possible shot for the cover. Lauren looks unrecognizable, something totally different about her eyes and face shape. She looks more like herself in the third shot from #16, which I think would have made a better cover. Although I do admire the cover as a whole because it's very fitting for the season.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.