D
Deleted member 1957
Guest
they chose a bad picture for the cover!
Call me crazy but I thought she was known as a former 90's supermodel and nothing more. The American public barely knows of this woman. This is almost worst than their Hollywood Issue with unknown actors/actresses.
Call me crazy but I thought she was known as a former 90's supermodel and nothing more. The American public barely knows of this woman.
I think that's the point... VF & the influential powers that be... obviously for political reasons that can't be discussd here want the American public to know who she is & those that do know who she is to know more about her... which is exactly why she got the cover. Maureen Orth is an excellent writer... and regardless of whether you agree with it or not... you can't deny they [Sarkozy, Cécilia & Bruni] make a compelling story & that sells magazines... this issue is going to get lots of publicity on the US news channels & people are going to buy it.
There are a number of wives would would beg to disagree with your statement.She´s a bit of a boy´s girl...like a lot of girls, and she harms nobody.
There are a number of wives would would beg to disagree with your statement.
no supermodel cover? am i suppose to care about this girl?
and didn't they just feature one of the new bond girls in exactly the same type of setting and outfit as carla on the cover? the styling is getting really tired...