US Vogue October 1, 1971 : Donna Mitchell by Richard Avedon

Napier
Photo Unknown
Model Jennifer O'Neill



Charles of the Ritz The Eye Colour Game
Photo Unknown


vogue archive
 
Christian Dior
Photo Unknown
Model Unknown



Alexandra de Markoff
Photo Unknown
Model Unknown


vogue archive
 
Coty
Pam Suthern, Lucy Angle, Unknown
22 (47).jpeg23 (53).jpeg24 (43).jpeg25 (52).jpeg26 (28).jpeg27 (43).jpeg
Vogue Archive
 
Monsanto
Barbara Carrera
61 (37) (6).jpeg 62 (37).jpeg 63 (44).jpeg
Vogue Archive
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jaeger
Veronica Hamel
6 (53).jpeg

Revillon
Evelyn Kuhn
7 (41).jpeg

Lillie Rubin
Barbara Carrera
16 (39).jpeg

Crompton
Lucy Angle
30 (46).jpeg

Qiana
Maud Adams
105 (19).jpeg
Vogue Archive
 
Hi Bernie,
I really liked your comment and was tempted to respond. This cover has always bothered me a little. The delicacy of the twenties and at the same time the heavy, almost theatrical makeup, the inappropriate jewelry in her hair...
That's it! Diana was gone... but when does a dynasty really end?
There is a beautiful text (I can't remember the author now) that talks about someone's "presence". The perfume someone leaves in the room when they go, the words they said still in the air, the sound of their laught.
If you put a finger over her eyes you will see an elegant woman dressed in cashmere and furs, the look that Grace always bet on as her vision of glamour. But they are red (and you understand why, remembering Diana's room-in-hell apartment, her kabuki blush, her Valentinos...)
The first Grace cover in red and purple, and "purple is the navy blue of India", ou something like that. Could it be a tribute?
Your comment made me understand and love this cover. The eternal search for the new, since we are built from what existed before us.
Thank you.
 
Hi Bernie,
I really liked your comment and was tempted to respond. This cover has always bothered me a little. The delicacy of the twenties and at the same time the heavy, almost theatrical makeup, the inappropriate jewelry in her hair...
That's it! Diana was gone... but when does a dynasty really end?
There is a beautiful text (I can't remember the author now) that talks about someone's "presence". The perfume someone leaves in the room when they go, the words they said still in the air, the sound of their laught.
If you put a finger over her eyes you will see an elegant woman dressed in cashmere and furs, the look that Grace always bet on as her vision of glamour. But they are red (and you understand why, remembering Diana's room-in-hell apartment, her kabuki blush, her Valentinos...)
The first Grace cover in red and purple, and "purple is the navy blue of India", ou something like that. Could it be a tribute?
Your comment made me understand and love this cover. The eternal search for the new, since we are built from what existed before us.
Thank you.
I DO HAVE THIS ISSUE!
Yes, it just screams Mrs. Vreeland plus it's quite odd that Condé Nast just changed the editorial byline by simply putting her name at the very bottom.

Considering how Vogue produces their issues in advance, and judging by the budget under Vreeland's editorship, it was quite cost-efficient. Harper's Bazaar also gave Vreeland a tribute when she au revoir Monsieur Hearst for Vogue (Rumor has it that the art director left because he had an argument with Nancy White over this cover.)

I often wonder if there are any unpublished photos of Veruschka's fur caravan, which was rumored to have cost $1 million. I’d be curious to know what that would amount to in today's money.

EDIT: It's equivalent to 8 million
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,215
Messages
15,176,217
Members
85,973
Latest member
hopsfie
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->