US Vogue October 2001 : Carolyn Murphy by Steven Meisel

[justaguy]

Photo Steven Meisel
Editor Camilla Nickerson
Model Carolyn Murphy
Hair Orlando Pita
Makeup Pat McGrath




vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Funny Face Pt. 1
Photo Annie Leibovitz
Editor Grace Coddington
Models Stella Tennant, Jacqueta Wheeler, Oluchi Onweagba, Ai Tominaga, Karolina Kurkova
Hair Julien d'Ys
Makeup Stéphane Marais

 

[justaguy]

Funny Face Pt. 2


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Weekend Warriors Pt. 1
Photo Steven Klein
Editor Grace Coddington
Models Karolína Kurková, Carmen Kass
Hair Didier Malige
Makeup Charlotte Tilbury

 

[justaguy]

Weekend Warriors Pt. 2


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

The President's Prodigy
Photo Annie Leibovitz
Editor Alexandra Kotur
By Julia Reed
Subject Condoleezza Rice
Hair Dennis Devoy
Makeup Brigitte Philippides


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Castle in the Air
Photo François Halard
Editor Miranda Brooks
By Plum Sykes


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Boss Brows
Photo Michael Thompson
Editor Elissa Santisi
Model Anouck Lepère
Hair Didier Malige
Makeup Kay Montano


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Loving Touches
Photo Michael Thompson
Editor Elissa Santisi
Models Maggie Rizer, Anouck Lepère
Hair Didier Malige
Makeup Kay Montano


vogue archive

 

[justaguy]

Sweet & Lowdown
Photo Irving Penn
Editor Phyllis Posnick
By Joanne Chen


vogue archive

 

[Miss Dalloway]

I still have, and love this issue.

 

[justaguy]

I still have, and love this issue.

Don't think I ever saw it till last night!

 

[Phuel]

"Funny Face" is absolutely ruined by Ben. He's so unfunny and irritating, even in static shots.

 

[justaguy]

"Funny Face" is absolutely ruined by Ben. He's so unfunny and irritating, even in static shots.

Agreed. Hence, no credit on my post.

 

[dior_couture1245]

Stella Tennant is absolutely magnificent in “Funny Face.”

 

[Phuel]

^^^ Gorgeous cast-- including Karla nd Hedi. Gorgeous everything. Sadly ruined by Ben through and through.

 

[MagFan]

Did she retouch her old work for the book or was it paper and printing quality of Vogue that made her work looks less fake and bright? Always loved this ed, but never bought the issue to see it in person

from her Wonderland book
vogue.com
nyt.com

 

[Phuel]

^^^ LOL the Stella shot is so terrible. What’s wrong with Annie???

Stock wouldn’t determine the color balance output. Her book versions absolutely had terrible post work done. I get the impression Annie may have wanted a painterly approach, wherein the subject would be basking in near-unnatural light to stand out from the setting. But this sort of principle (that I still remember some teachers insisted when I was in university) doesn’t work for a photographic image: Stella looks like a sticker slapped onto the background… Oftentimes now, it’s unfortunate to see such awful retouching/post accepted as the standard these days. This, and Rafael’s consistently awful, amateur post is plastered all over Vogues/campaigns, and people will not question how awful and cheap it all looks.

 

[justaguy]

Did she retouch her old work for the book or was it paper and printing quality of Vogue that made her work looks less fake and bright? Always loved this ed, but never bought the issue to see it in person

from her Wonderland book
vogue.com
nyt.com

The actual issue was 100% better than what we saw online. Colors much richer and the images were just more crisp.