Vita Sidorkina Morabito

[lovely lethargy]

She's definitely not one of my absolute favourites, but I do like her quite a bit. She's easily recognizable (at least to me) and I find that to be a good quality to possess. I would like to see more work from her.

 

[Bruno D]

Photographed by Lev Efimov For Bambi

 

[Flyest]

oh my the pics 2,3,6,7 are just wrong..... I don't like Lev Efimov anymore if this is shot by him and I think it is. why? why? why? it doesn't look good at all and it's completely unnecessary.

and where is the source? if it was shot by you Bruno, you should credit it as well, no? who shot these?

 

[Flyest]

I think lolita look has become so overrated now, why does she need to look like pedophile's dream? and I don't think she showed her nipple on purpose without any suggestion on the side. it's not sexy, in my opinion. lacks class. it's just awkward.

 

[sidda]

I agree. There is nothing fashion or editorial about these, they just give you a creepy exploitative vibe.

 

[EnVogueLove]

I also agree. It's so stupid and wierd I care about clothes and the model, I don't give a damn about how she looks naked.

OT: She reminds me a lot of Jane Randall.

 

[Flyest]

donnamodels.jp

 

[Flyest]

donnamodels.jp

 

[Karen0193]

Very promising and cute girl. I don't undestand why all her Lev Efimov work has to show something sexy it looks kind of awkard because she has such a baby and delicate face.

 

[Flyest]

the answer is simple-because 90% of the straight male photographers are pervs!

 

[FASHIONOGRAPHY]

She's stunning. Lev Efimov makes nice photos. What's really unnecessary is all the hatred and insults. It's unfortunate.

 

[wangster]

I think lolita look has become so overrated now, why does she need to look like pedophile's dream? and I don't think she showed her nipple on purpose without any suggestion on the side. it's not sexy, in my opinion. lacks class. it's just awkward.

Totally agree. Those shots are so unnessecary and random. It's not any high fashion to me. I feel really uncomfortable, just looking at them (especially at the second last photo). I see child p*rn*gr*phy in it

 

[Fantomette]

Oyster magazine #94

15
Photographer: Ben Rayner

fashiongonerogue.com

So she's officially 17 years old. It means she was 16ish or 17 in the pictures of this thread that made some of us feel uncomfortable.
There are higher quality versions of the Oyster picture online and it makes no doubt the shirt she's wearing is slightly see throught. The editorial features fifteen new faces and Vita is the only one with a see through shirt. *sigh*

 

[Fantomette]

Nylon August 2011

Cotton Mouth
Vita by Christopher Starbody
Styled by Martha Violante



ebook30

Now that's age appropriate.

 

[Flyest]

see? I'm not the only one crazy here having certain thoughts without a reason. I knew she's something around 16 years old and yes, her face shows it. I can't respect a photographer who's shooting half nude 16 year olds and has clear conscience about it. sorry.

 

[Fantomette]

French Revue De Modes #19 FW 11.12

Photography: Thierry le Gouès
Style: Marcell Rocha

Photographer:Thierry le Gouès
Stylist: Marcell Rocha
Models: Ajak Deng, Alyssa Miller, Charlotte Free, Hana Jirickova, Lisanne de Jong, Jasmine Tookes, Marloes Horst, Nicole Trunfio, Robyn Lawley, Sabrina Nait, Xiao Wen, Vita Sidorkina(?), Cris Urena and Carly Engleton(?)


fashiongonerogue

 

[AndVerbov]

Test from Paris:





For L'Oreal:




cheriemodels.blogspot.com

 

[Melanie Hill]

Collezioni Russia HQ

 

[mom4etozavsi4ko]

what a beauty

 

[matsuchan92]

Omg!! Is that you Jac??