Even after all these years on TFS, I just adore Bertrando for how unwaveringly passionate he remains to an ideal of fashion.
Why wouldn’t the shallow fashion industry also cower and give the delusional mob what they want, with the lowest of the standards of talent/beauty/style being championed instead of only the highest of standards??? These are such days. Eh.
To even suggest she’s sensual would enrage the mob ready with their torch and pitchfork accusations of anyone daring of objectifying an aboriginal model— because apparently fashion models are no longer fashion models, but representatives and ambassadors for their people LOL Just have a gander through Franca’s/Carine’s/Emmanuelle’s Vogues and imagine what could have been with her shot by Testino/Sorrenti/Sims etc etc. But of course the reality is that Vogue is a school project by those raised on social justice 101 (First-World problems version), with the creative references of Tyra’s 10th season ANTM/Project Runway/Rupaul’s Drag Race… :sigh:
It’s also so obvious that Christine is so blatantly desperate to out-diversify Edward's Vogue LOL If anyone didn’t know of her country’s ethnic makeup, they’d think that it were primarily an aboriginal and Black population LMFAO …Anyway, 310pg: 3 original fashions stories and 3 reprints, with that dreaded Rafael monstrosity of a mess being one of them. Of course.
I loved reading every single word you used and I don't think I ever wanted to have the ''give karma button'' back on the forums, as much as today with you Phuel ahahaa.
I think I will always love fashion photography and a certain ideal of the fashion industry and perhaps I am stuck between 1986 and 2005 and it's indeed quite hard for me to let it all go : the super fierce models of the 90's + the legendary photographers from that era + the name first designers + the state of magazines back then 30 years ago + the beauty in ads with glamazon looking female models and semi-god handsome male supers of that era + the real old-school designers like Coco Chanel, Christian Dior, Jeanne Lanvin and a certain class of the people worldwide and a certain economy too lol and so on.
And I also believe, like you mentioned, that the standards have changed so so much and my ideal ''vision'' of fashion that I referred to is clashing so harshly against what I see today:
- no sex anywhere because it's considered bad to show it in magazines or in advertising
- the gen z generation / the tiktok nonsense / influencers who have never dedicated an afternoon to know about fashion or photography as a whole or to learn 10 names of this industry
- people nowadays who are not able to truly get the difference between let's say a Linda or a Raquel with girls like Emily Ratajkowski or Kendall or anyone else with fake ''likes'' on social media.
- plus like you also mentioned editors like Christine at Vogue Australia or Edward at British Vogue who vie for people's acceptance or world recognition that they are inclusivity warriors
etc.
I haven't bought a single magazine in the past 8 years and I was such an avid collector for half of my life but it's not interesting anyways these days. Again as you asked: where are the standards today? Where's beauty? It's just there now to please mobs of people who loved to be offended and demand ferociously just about anything they can think of and who grew up in today's world with ''social justice'' syndrome, like you perfectly mentioned (I loved the [First-World problems version] quote you used ahahaha

). It's the same as my students these days or kids now: they ask, they demand, they are eager to receive but wait : where are your obligations and duties ???

.
I fear that, as much as I would love and still want to see many many models and people who are black / asian / white / latino and every single skin tone of the planet that it will only be used like here as a scam or like a token moment just to justify or please a certain mob.