W October 2006 : Janet Jackson by Michael Thompson

[Mirik]

http://fadedyouth.blogspot.com/

 

[ShoeGal4Eva]

OHHHH MYYYYYYY GODDDDDDDD!i hate what she usually wears.prolly cuz she mostly ever wears anything at all!so you've lost weight,doesnt mean you have to be naked on cover of every single magazine!!
cover looks like it is cover of ****** PLAYBOY.
and she looks like michael jackson in second picture(second row,from the left).
this is the worst cover of w this year

 

[Moofins]

Oh...Oh gosh. This is almost distressing...but I won't say anything until I actually see scans...

Although, by looking at it right now, I am NOT liking it. At All.

 

[AD011620]

the Cover is disgusting

 

[Faith Akiyama]

What the HECK is all that?

 

[Label Basher]

OHHHH MYYYYYYY GODDDDDDDD!

I said the exact same thing even before I saw you message

i hate what she usually wears.prolly cuz she mostly ever wears anything at all!so you've lost weight,doesnt mean you have to be naked on cover of every single magazine!!
cover looks like it is cover of ****** PLAYBOY.
and she looks like michael jackson in second picture(second row,from the left).
this is the worst cover of w this year

I agree. Karma ShoeGal

Janet has soooooo lost "It". I do feel bad for her cause her songs and dancing in the 90s were wicked but now she is just so lame, well not as embarassing as Whitney (kiss my ***) Huston.

 

[bluedolphin]

２

sooo uly cover

Janet Jackson looks cheap~~

 

[Monmonde]

Arrrghhh really gross! YUCK!

 

[truebluejen]

Thank god they don't sell it round here. I won't have to look at it!
I feel sorry for all of you how subscribe and have to get this...thing!

 

[tigerrouge]

I would have quite enjoyed this cover image for its unabashed trashiness - the 'big hair', the skintight leotard, the overblown spirit of 1980's aerobics... IF it wasn't for the addition of those strange polkadot fingerless gloves, which completely skew the image into making no sense at all. They look like plaster casts for broken arms. Dull, heavy, wrong.

As for those editorial images, I'll not even start. They make her look like a midget doing an S&M exercise regimen. Now that she's in shape again, couldn't they have found clothes that flattered her body?

 

[contiguous]

Why W? Janet isnt gonna sell the magazines.

 

[bluejeans]

i think i'm gonna have nightmares tonight..

 

[polka_dot]

Horrible! Somebody please tell me there's something great inside to make up for this. A mega Fendi or Cavalli ad spread would be a good start.

 

[L.A.Gant]

It looked a bit better on TV as the images were flashing by..... But the caption above is truely horrible. Hopefully, it's a bit better in print. I wish the image was clear enough to see the content highlights. I will not get this issue unless there is some amazing stuff other than the Janet feature.

 

[Pulp Fiction]

oooh my ! the cover is horrible doesn't even look like her and she's not that thin

 

[glósóli]

Eurgh, she's disgusting.
Whyyyyyyyy ?!?!?!?!?!?!

 

[testinofan]

Loooved the photos

 

[lavieenrose]

Is she *trying* to look like a contestant on that Stan Lee Superhero show?

I'd have loved to see these photos pre-Photoshop. She looks too artificially perfect.

 

[mizenkay]

scary!!

she's lookin' more and more like latoya everyday. and that is so not a good thing.

 

[Dieselmax]

DAMN!!! that's fugly! Janet on the cover of a fashion mag ? so wrong... Definitely won't buy it if the content sucks as much as the cover (at least, i would save some money )