Coach Owner to Buy Parent of Versace in Luxury Mega Merger

In the US they might consider themselves as part of luxury but from Europe, you better be sure that nobody consider this group as a serious opponent.

Versace, given it place in fashion, the ambition of Donatella and the overall « importance » of the brand, seems more and more out of place in this equation.

Donatella was maybe too greedy…
I get it, she used the momentum the brand had to sell to the highest price (I wonder how she felt when Tom sold his brand for 1Billion more) but is Capri the right Partner?

‘Maybe she should have been more reasonable and sold it to the Qataris.They did a great job with Valentino and Balmain.

I mean, why Versace Jeans Couture still exists?
 
Coach Owner to Buy Parent of Versace in Luxury Mega Merger
The two fashion conglomerates, Tapestry and Capri Holdings, generate about $12 billion in combined revenue.

By Jordyn Holman
Aug. 10, 2023
Updated 9:24 a.m. ET

Tapestry, the fashion company that owns Coach and Kate Spade, said on Thursday it had acquired Capri Holdings, the parent of Versace and Michael Kors, for about $8.5 billion, a sign of consolidation in the luxury market.

Capri shareholders will receive $57 per share in cash. Combined, the two conglomerates account for $12 billion in revenue.

The deal is a partnership of two large American companies with familiar luxury brands coming together as high-end retailers look for growth, amid signs that U.S. consumers are pulling back on discretionary spending.

Tapestry and Capri together include six brands, including Jimmy Choo and Stuart Weitzman.

For Tapestry, the acquisition will help expand its reach in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and it would give Capri’s brands more exposure in Asia.

The chief executives of both companies stressed that the combination would bring their handbags, shoes and apparel to a broader consumer base across 75 countries and let them tap into more resources. The companies said the merger also presented an opportunity to increase their direct-to-consumer business and save them $200 million in operating and supply-chain costs within three years.

Bringing the six brands together “creates a new powerful global luxury house, unlocking a unique opportunity to drive enhanced value for our consumers, employees, communities, and shareholders around the world,” Joanne Crevoiserat, chief executive of Tapestry, said in a statement.

“By joining with Tapestry, we will have greater resources and capabilities to accelerate the expansion of our global reach while preserving the unique DNA of our brands,” John D. Idol, the Capri chief executive, said in a statement.

Tapestry’s stock was down 3 percent before the market open on Thursday. Capri rose nearly 60 percent. On Wednesday, before the news was announced, Capri’s stock closed at just under $35.

“The potential deal comes at a time when luxury is facing something of a slowdown, especially in the North American market where consumers, even at the higher income end of the market, are starting to curtail spending,” Neil Saunders, managing director at GlobalData, said in an emailed statement. “This has put pressure on Tapestry and Capri, both of which are now looking to international markets to bolster growth. There is more security in embarking on bold international plans as a larger entity.”

The deal also gives Tapestry more cachet in the luxury market, analysts said.

“Tapestry has long-eyed becoming a bona fide ‘house of luxury’” similar to Kering and LVMH in Europe, said Craig Johnson, president of consultancy Customer Growth Partners. “But its current brands are near-luxe rather than true luxe. Capri gives Tapestry a toehold in the true luxe world, which even though Kors is by far Capri’s largest brand, over time Versace may well be the real ‘jewel in the crown.’”

In its most recent quarter, Tapestry’s net sales increased 13 percent. Capri’s revenue in its most recent quarter fell 10.5 percent.

Tapestry said it would report its quarterly and full-year earnings on Aug. 17.
Source: NYT

Tapestry Acquiring Capri in $8.5 Billion Deal
The acquisition brings Versace, Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo and Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman under one roof.

By EVAN CLARK
AUGUST 10, 2023, 6:57AM

Tapestry Inc. is buying Capri Holdings in a roughly $8.5 billion deal that alters the fashion landscape and remakes the world of accessible luxury handbags.

The acquisition brings together Tapestry’s Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman with Capri’s Michael Kors, Versace and Jimmy Choo to create a $12 billion giant.

It’s a transaction that marks the culmination of years of deal making by both companies and is the closest America has yet come to building a branded portfolio powerhouse in the image of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton or Kering, which posted 79.2 billion euros in sales, and 20.35 billion euros in sales, respectively, for 2022.

The combined company will have a much larger footprint to command attention and can also cut corporate overhead to the tune of $200 million for leaner operations. Having a larger portfolio means more stability, with stronger brands able to provide some cover when any one brand lags.

The combined company will have more than 33,000 employees and operate in 75 countries and last year produced adjusted operating profits of nearly $2 billion.

The combined company will operate in 75 countries and last year produced adjusted operating profits of nearly $2 billion.

Joanne Crevoiserat, chief executive officer of Tapestry, said: “We are ready to leverage our competitive advantages across a broader portfolio of brands. The combination of Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman together with Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors creates a new powerful global luxury house, unlocking a unique opportunity to drive enhanced value for our consumers, employees, communities, and shareholders around the world.”

And John D. Idol, chairman and CEO of Capri, said: “Today’s announcement marks a major milestone for Capri. It is a testament to all that our teams have achieved in building Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors into the iconic and powerful luxury fashion houses they are today. We are confident this combination will deliver immediate value to our shareholders. It will also provide new opportunities for our dedicated employees around the world as Capri becomes part of a larger and more diversified company. By joining with Tapestry, we will have greater resources and capabilities to accelerate the expansion of our global reach while preserving the unique DNA of our brands.”

Under the deal, Tapestry is paying $57 a share, or $6.7 billion to Capri’s investors, giving the company an enterprise value of $8.5 billion. That represents a deal price of 9-times adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Tapestry said the deal was not subject to new financing, as it has already secured $8 billion in bridge financing from Bank of America and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding. The company, however, will suspend its share repurchase activity to pay down debt and anticipates having a leverage ratio of below 2.5-times debt-to-EBITDA within two years of closing.

The deal will bolster Tapestry in the luxury category with Versace and Jimmy Choo, and expand greatly on the more accessible price points that Coach targets with Michael Kors.

“Versace and Jimmy Choo are both powerful additions that can be nurtured and swung into growth fairly easily,” said Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData. “The Michael Kors brand, which is the biggest part of Capri Holdings, is more problematic. Its positioning and distribution are not fully optimized, and this has been reflected in its continued weak performance.

“Tapestry has plenty of experience of reviving problem brands from its turnaround of Coach, which had become ubiquitous and sullied through constant discounting and promotions,” Saunders said. “Kate Spade was also in a similar position when Tapestry acquired it and is now emerging in positive form from a successful reinvention. The same thinking can arguably be applied to Michael Kors, but the more complex nature of the brand will make any revival much more difficult and time consuming.”

Ike Boruchow, an analyst at Wells Fargo, said the deal is “obviously transformational for Tapestry and reshapes the landscape of the handbag space, particularly in the US. The addition of Michael Kors cements Tapestry as the number one player in the accessible luxury handbag market in the U.S. by a wide margin.”

Now the company just has to make that position work for it.
Source: WWD
 
The entire brand portfolio under the Tapestry-Capri merger will be:
• Coach
• Jimmy Choo
• Kate Spade
• Michael Kors
• Stuart Weitzman
• Versace

Out of their full portfolio, Versace is the only European luxury brand with the cache that comes with it. The rest of their portfolio are Anglo-American accessible luxury brands with Stuart Weitzman being firmly in the contemporary market

What this means is that Versace is going to require a completely different approach in terms of management, resourcing and merchandising in order to retain its "upper luxury" brand positioning.

If this isn't done correctly, this could be another Helmut Lang situation where the brand is has to go downmarket to stay operational. This could also explain the gradual downsizing of the "Atelier Versace" line from a full collection to a red carpet operation.
 
Why do they keep ‘Tapestry’?! if you’re going to be a gross conglomerate, change it to something sketchy-sounding but at least more dignified. ‘T.PS III Ltd’ or some bs, anything but ‘Tapestry’.

I think it's cute, a Tapestry of... tacky.

(Ok, but I do have one Coach bag that I like. Sue me!!!! It's relatively well made and inconspicuous.)
 
It's a great business move.

Versace may seem out of place but to be honest there's still a lot of logistical and operational overlap. It will still be a huge boon to its business---even if they may not be able to dip into the same supply chain network as the rest of them.

But I really wish they'd change the name from Tapestry to something else.
 
They should buy brands like Christian Lacroix, John Galliano and Julien Macdonald and try to make them happen in their own brands...

I hope they move Jennifer Lopez from Coach to Versace or Michael Kors.
 
You made me remember Julien Macdonald only to find out that his label was recently liquidated...
Julien Macdonald’s Business Goes Into Liquidation
Liquidators FTS Recovery have confirmed that they are selling stock and other assets in order to seek repayment for creditors.

By SAMANTHA CONTI
JULY 23, 2023, 5:00AM

LONDON — Tough economic times have claimed another industry victim — Julien Macdonald, whose business has gone into liquidation.

On Sunday, insolvency practitioners FTS Recovery confirmed that Alan Coleman and Marco Piacquadio have been appointed joint liquidators to the fashion brand that was founded by Macdonald in 1997.

In a brief statement, FTS said Macdonald’s business fell into trouble during the COVID-19 pandemic, “which has affected all aspects of the retail sector.”

FTS added that Macdonald’s label had lost “a significant proportion of revenue” following the collapse of Debenhams at the end of 2020, and that no employees or existing contracts could be saved.

The liquidators said they are selling stock and other assets in order to seek repayment for creditors.

Coleman, a director at FTS Recovery, added that cash flow at Julien Macdonald had been severely impacted due to the “loss and under performance” of several key contracts.

“The cash flow issues were compounded by general inflationary costs, which impacted on all aspects of the business,” Coleman added.

Britain, like many other countries, has been fighting to bring down inflation and has witnessed a series of punishing interest rate hikes over the past 12 months.

In February, Macdonald — a knitwear specialist and runway showman — had returned to London Fashion Week after a three-year hiatus.

He made his comeback with a typically glittering show and a front row that was brimming with wealthy clients and reality TV stars wearing his ultra-glamorous designs.

In true Macdonald fashion, the show featured laser lights and smoke, with the first model emerging from the fog in a black, long-sleeved bodysuit decorated with mirrors.

There were cutout minidresses, feathered styles and men’s tailoring featuring studs, embroidery and sequins.

“I’m so happy because I’m back to doing what I love, which is making women feel glamorous,” said the designer, who staged the show with help from his friend and biggest private client, the Mexican socialite Gabriela González.

Before the show, WWD paid a visit to Macdonald’s London studio, where a team of more than 20 were hand-beading and knitting his high-end runway looks.

But the buzz around the final show was not enough to sustain the designer, who had suffered a series of setbacks in recent years.

Macdonald, along with Jasper Conran, Matthew Williamson, John Rocha and Preen, had been among a group of British designers with long-term, lucrative contracts for secondary collections for Debenhams.

Those contracts allowed many of those creative talents to sustain their businesses, stage runway shows and bolster their profiles. But everything ended when Debenhams collapsed.

In 2021, Boohoo purchased Debenhams’ brand equity, website and customer base, but the physical stores across the country shut for good.

The same year that Debenhams closed, Macdonald inked a three-year deal with Freemans Grattan Holdings, the U.K. division of the German retail giant Otto Group, for a collection of clothing, accessories and homeware.

He also contributed some of his new designs to that company’s Curvissa plus-size collection, and Kaleidoscope, which focuses on more formalwear and eveningwear. A selection of his styles were also sold through the Otto sites in Germany.

The liquidation marks the end of an extraordinary run for the designer who has dressed the likes of Jennifer Lopez, Kylie Minogue, Kim Kardashian, Beyoncé and Heidi Klum — and who is no stranger to the stage himself.

He has appeared as a judge on “Britain & Ireland’s Next Top Model” and as a contestant on the popular TV show “Strictly Come Dancing” in the U.K.

At the start of his career the designer worked with Karl Lagerfeld at Chanel and with Lee Alexander McQueen designing knitwear. He served as head designer at Givenchy from 2001 to 2004, and during the 2000s designed the flight attendants’ uniforms for British Airways.

Julien Macdonald joins a long list of fashion businesses that have run into trouble due to the impact of the pandemic, rising inflation and interest rates.

As reported last week, Christopher and Tammy Kane purchased the IP and assets of the Christopher Kane fashion label, which had been placed into administration last month.
Source: WWD
 
They should buy brands like Christian Lacroix, John Galliano and Julien Macdonald and try to make them happen in their own brands...

I hope they move Jennifer Lopez from Coach to Versace or Michael Kors.

Ugh. To have Galliano and Lacroix back to their own brands...
 
Tapestry stocks fell but Capri stocks increased. Tells you what you need to know as to who holds the cards.

Even if it's midmarket, Tapestry has done an excellent job transforming their brands' DTC businesses and moving to a higher price point while simultaneously maintaining a strong outlet business. I would imagine they have a strategy in mind for Michael Kors to become a revenue driver for the group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KoV
Lacroix's house should be closed. I deeply admire his work and find him to be a true artist but the industry has changed too much. It's great seeing him designing costumes, where he can fully express himself as opposed to churning out dumbed down collections just so the heads are happy.

I wonder who is going to take over Versace when Donatella retires or dies.
 
Their brand portfolio is a bit awkward, I can see they could hardly accquire European brands in the future. Maybe they will buy some Australian brands like Zimmermann.
 
Just SEEING Versace in the same sentence as M****** K*** makes me gag. It's so hard to be on Donatella's side these days though.
 
Just SEEING Versace in the same sentence as M****** K*** makes me gag. It's so hard to be on Donatella's side these days though.
MK is the best thing that ever happened to Versace since Gianni. The new Versace actually looks like Versace and not whatever crap Donatella comes up with. I dont like Donatella because she tried to compete and replace Giannis codes. Yet Versace not produced a hit since Gianni died. Versace has been running on Gianni hype for 30 years.

They should buy brands like Christian Lacroix, John Galliano and Julien Macdonald and try to make them happen in their own brands...

I hope they move Jennifer Lopez from Coach to Versace or Michael Kors.
LaCroix and Galliano are owned by LVMH and they wont ever give them up.
 
This is Michael Kors continuing to put Bernard out of business. MK is the only designer LVMH worked with who is now a conglomerate owner.

I give MK his flowers because his Department store line is basically knock off Dior and LV primarily. MK said “why design new stuff when I can cheapen yours?” Just around the holidays I was stunned to see so many 1 for 1 LV knockoffs. Off the top of my head - there is the MK Neverfull, MK Alma, MK Speedy. MK even made their own version of the LV Dauphine line including logo. MK doesnt let LV breathe.

https://mcys.co/42ocbdR
Versus
https://us.louisvuitton.com/eng-us/products/mini-dauphine-epi-nvprod2010021v/M55964

Off hand it seems like Bernard made an enemy of MK since his Department store line focuses only on LVMH dupes.

I think we will see wild repositioning of brands. Coach has had a lot of good press over their bag quality. Even I now respect Coachs craftsmanship. I expect Coach to move up market.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,979
Messages
15,135,859
Members
84,744
Latest member
fashiongloss
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->