fantastical
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 5,298
- Reaction score
- 2
Once again my theory is true - whenever the VMAs aren't in New York they suck. SUCK big time. And not having a host was just plain stupid.
That Britney tribute wasn't even really a tribute. The little girls dancing was awesome but hello that was it. What a joke. Clearly it was only for ratings. The performances weren't that great either. Adele was the best and she looked beautiful. Why was there no rock music. Why not ask the Foos to perform.
The fashion wasn't anything special. I swear there were more celebs there last year. Britney, Zoe and Katie Holmes looked cute. Katy Perry looked quirky cute in the Versace.
Hopefully next year will be better and back in NYC where is supose to be.
agree on ALL ACCOUNTS! what a lackluster year for the VMA's
especially regarding the so called "tributes" to Britney and Amy W.
not having a host made the show feel empty...when it ended it just - ended, there was no real conclusion to the show
I also feel like the "red carpet", or whatever that was, was a terrible idea. We didn't get to see pretty much anyone like a real red carpet would have been
the best performances by far was Adele and Beyonce