ok.
but if it isn't -- then putting him in drag just seems obvious and gimmicky and, if i'm honest, a bit exploitative.
hm .. i don't know how to say it without it coming across as offensive. which is absolutely NOT my intention. i think he's completely stunning! and when they play up the androgyny, that's quite compelling, because his beauty is so surreal and surprising. but there is a difference between "androgyny" and "dressing like the opposite sex". androgyny is where the lines are blurred. where it's like, "this guy is too beautiful to be a guy. but he is. this is crazy gorgeous awesomeness." lol. whereas putting him in heels and a gown is just, "oh. there's a drag queen on the JPG runway." it's so simple. it's not challenging or powerful or compelling. it's just drag, which we can see any weekend at any number of gay bars in our respective cities. lol.