this collection is a bunch of arrogant trash that exploits the image of the poor across the world for Bernard's personal material again and amusement of a bunch of lost rich teenagers.
I think I might be the only person who sides with travolta on this. It is a bit too much to suggest that BW exploits the African poor with this - Africa is severely exploited, but BW isn't the one doing the exploiting! We all know by what sorts, and they are more likely to wear Dior, Vuitton, Gucci, etc. Maybe he is making a sort of statement, the way Balenciaga did incorporating checked Arab Palestinian headwear in one of his most beautiful collections. And beauty is subjective, isn't it?
Personally, I'd prefer designers to take risks, too few of them do it, if you would be honest about this. We are more often than not inundated with "themed" collections in NY, Paris & Milan every season, let's applaud designers who do something different, even if we don't like to wear them.
Would we berate indie movie directors for producing art house fare that nobody sees? Should we only support blockbusters? Look, the money-making crowd-pleasers don't need us, they do just fine on their own. It's the rare, alternative, creative guys that need to know that they need to continue to break rules and that true fashionistas support that.
I hardly put CDG or Galliano in that league, btw. They too churned out the same vaguely subversive but actually commercially successful stuff all the time. Nothing wrong with that, they are just filling another market niche. BW doesn't have to be visionary or relevant, he's doing his own thing. I don't buy or wear BW, but it interests me enough to take another look and makes me think a bit about the prints, proportions and his idea of fashion. What's the point in trying to get him to become another Eley Kishimoto? He's just fine as BW.