Phuel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 6,163
- Reaction score
- 10,809
Tisci's Burberry has been a tragedy. This collection is literally his tenure at Givenchy in a nutshell, just incredibly dumbed down. However, Riccardo seems not to be able to realized that it's 2021, not 2012 and this stuff will not make it yet again. While I get the sense of being consistent in terms of aesthetic, he doesn't seem to be interested in any kind of evolution and it's rather sad.
Frankly, even his Givenchy menswear branding— not just the designs, but the casting and styling as well, was “burrowed” heavily (I would even say ripped off) from Gaultier’s multiracial/multicultural beautiful masculinity. He never was wholly original when it came to his vision of men. It relied on the seasonal gimmicky print and the overall look and casting was just consistently sexy AF. And for that, I don’t mind that he’s repurposed his Burberry to recall this Givenchy’s Gaultier masculine imagery, just now dressed in blatant hyper-Helmut tribute. In better times, I would be as critical of this offering as yourself. But we’re not in better times… Us starved beggars can’t be choosers in this fashion famine. And he’s been floundering aimlessly to the point of burying Burberry to such mundane outlet-mall mediocrity that a recycled offering like this— and in no way does it reach the critical and creative heights of Christopher’s Burberry Prorsum in celebrating/elevating/culminating commerce-meets-creativity in its glorious branding of such a proudly English heritage label, seems like Riccardo’s finally waking up with some creative fight in him still.
I'll take it.