Carolina Herrera 'La Bomba' Fragrance 2025 : Vittoria Ceretti by Charlotte Wales

[chrisand489]

 

[TomBlanksFullFatMiuMiu]

She is repping too many brands, its confusing

 

[DK92]

What a HORRIBLE bottle! But I think it's part of their strategy, because Good Girl is also terrible and became a hit.

 

[chrisand489]

What a HORRIBLE bottle! But I think it's part of their strategy, because Good Girl is also terrible and became a hit.

That bottle is….not good lol

 

[chrisand489]

(Carolina Herrera)

 

[Lola701]

Was her face stuck on someone else’s body on that first dress shot?

She is repping too many brands, its confusing

She is a model…
Isn’t that the point?

 

[Avonlea]

It's strange to see her do an ad for CH and DG fragrance at the same time. It is her job, but I am surprised neither of the brands paid for exclusivity.

 

[Gonzalo]

I'm glad for its ubiquity but it has fewer records than Zoolander .

 

[TomBlanksFullFatMiuMiu]

Was her face stuck on someone else’s body on that first dress shot?

She is a model…
Isn’t that the point?

This comment from Avonlea! Also, when a model is no longer just a blank canvas and develops her own identity...
There is also zero history between her and CH ~ what a random pairing
At least for DG, she is Italian, and with Chanel, she was the last bride for Karl and a favorite of Virginie

It's strange to see her do an ad for CH and DG fragrance at the same time. It is her job, but I am surprised neither of the brands paid for exclusivity.

 

[LadyJunon]

Looks like Jacquemus will need to find a new name for his fragrance then...

 

[Nimsay]

lmao that bottle is off some hideous CH clutches. The little gemstone is the clasp on the clutches they do. Its not even a real gemstone which makes the clutches so much cheaper since opaque pink marble or white marvle wouldnt cost that much….

 

[WAVES]

Was her face stuck on someone else’s body on that first dress shot?

it’s unfortunately just bad Photoshop…

It's strange to see her do an ad for CH and DG fragrance at the same time. It is her job, but I am surprised neither of the brands paid for exclusivity.

advertising that includes TV it’s extremely costly and naturally well paid so I’m sure that paying for exclusivity would even more expensive.
nevertheless, I did also think that Vittoria would have exclusivity for such campaign!

we all know the fragrance/ brand that would make total sense for her to be fronting *coughs in Chanel*

now, regarding this specific campaign: it’s cute, Vittoria looks beautiful and it all works (I do find odd the choice of a butterfly for a perfume called ‘La Bomba’…)

 

[fashionlov]

My immediate perplexity was that of the two brands as I have seen in others apparently. I don't know, she has never even done a Carolina Herrera show... At least we know who's taking her to the Met next year. All in all, happy for Vittoria, even if that means her contract with Chanel has most likely expired by now

 

[Lola701]

This comment from Avonlea! Also, when a model is no longer just a blank canvas and develops her own identity...
There is also zero history between her and CH ~ what a random pairing
At least for DG, she is Italian, and with Chanel, she was the last bride for Karl and a favorite of Virginie

It's strange to see her do an ad for CH and DG fragrance at the same time. It is her job, but I am surprised neither of the brands paid for exclusivity.

Oh I get it.
I think overall the industry and fashion people recognize her for her stature as model but the thing is that she is still an active top model.

I don’t think she has « sealed » her branding. She hasn’t reached that celebrity or iconic status. It may get there eventually.

If ever Chanel gives her a fragrance campaign, she will be exclusive to them but so far no. She is the face of Chanel beauty but not fragrances yet.
I hate the word « deserving » but she maybe deserves more the Gabrielle fragrance contract than Rianne now. Hopefully she will get it.

 

[fashionlov]

Just curious: could it have been filmed in Budapest?

 

[chrisand489]

(Carolina Herrera)

 

[chrisand489]

My immediate perplexity was that of the two brands as I have seen in others apparently. I don't know, she has never even done a Carolina Herrera show... At least we know who's taking her to the Met next year. All in all, happy for Vittoria, even if that means her contract with Chanel has most likely expired by now

Well, all good things come to an end, it was bound to expire eventually. Nothing too shocking. Even counting Dolce & Gabbana, both are fragrance deals, so no real clash with a beauty contract.


She had fragrance campaigns for Bottega Veneta and Tiffany & Co. while still under a beauty contract for Chanel, so I don’t think it’s that deep. That said, I doubt she might has lost her chance to touch Chanel fragrances line soon… (fan tears quietly falling).

As for Carolina Herrera, that is true, she’s never done their runway, but that’s not exactly a deal-breaker. She fronted Ermanno Scervino without ever walking for them either. It happens though.

 

[fashionlov]

Well, all good things come to an end, it was bound to expire eventually. Nothing too shocking. Even counting Dolce & Gabbana, both are fragrance deals, so no real clash with a beauty contract.


She had fragrance campaigns for Bottega Veneta and Tiffany & Co. while still under a beauty contract for Chanel, so I don’t think it’s that deep. That said, I doubt she might has lost her chance to touch Chanel fragrances line soon… (fan tears quietly falling).

As for Carolina Herrera, that is true, she’s never done their runway, but that’s not exactly a deal-breaker. She fronted Ermanno Scervino without ever walking for them either. It happens though.

I almost agree with everything, but it might feel strange for me not to see her in a Chanel Beauty ad after years. As regards Vittoria Ceretti and the relationships with the various fashion houses: Ermanno Scervino, whom you mentioned, tends to choose very famous models for the campaign and debuting or little-known models for the shows (also consider that the stylist was Sissy Vian, her personal stylist for a time and the photographers were Luigi & Iango: this could have significantly influenced the decision). Choosing a face for a perfume is different: that person could represent the product for a long time and I believe that he or she should be immediately affiliated with the brand.

 

[chrisand489]

I almost agree with everything, but it might feel strange for me not to see her in a Chanel Beauty ad after years. As regards Vittoria Ceretti and the relationships with the various fashion houses: Ermanno Scervino, whom you mentioned, tends to choose very famous models for the campaign and debuting or little-known models for the shows (also consider that the stylist was Sissy Vian, her personal stylist for a time and the photographers were Luigi & Iango: this could have significantly influenced the decision). Choosing a face for a perfume is different: that person could represent the product for a long time and I believe that he or she should be immediately affiliated with the brand.

I totally agree. After nearly 8 years of being the face of Chanel Beauty, it does feel strange not seeing her in any recent campaigns. As a fan, I really wish she could stay on for 10 years, or even 20 (though that might be wishful thinking lol)

As for the fragrance side, I suppose Light Blue feels more like a couple’s scent, whereas La Bomba seems to be more of a feminine, standalone fragrance… maybe that’s how they’re positioning it? Not sure though…

 

[zoom]

Herrera's fragrances are top selling in the industry. Makes sense why she did it, although how she wasn't already locked into brand exclusivity is truly a mystery.