GIVENCHYlover
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,939
- Reaction score
- 77
I'm really loving this collection.
Fendi is not performing that well. Kim Jones has been a flop. People at LVMH thought Fendi was going to reach the same level of success of his Dior, but it didn’t. I don’t think he will last more than two years from now.Bigger than FENDI ? Show me the numbers
While I love this collection, I really hope not. His references are always so limited. I don't think he has the range.Hedi will be like Karl - in that he will stay at Celine prob until he retires or passes.
While I agree with you on most of these houses re-their level of cheapness, I honestly think Hermes is a victim of their clients and not of the product offerings. Their RTWs are timeless (boring sure). Same can be said about most of their merchandise lineup. We mostly associate Hermes with tacky wannabes and their Birkins/Kellys, but also forget about the chic customers who have been shopping there for years, if not decades.Fendi is not performing that well. Kim Jones has been a flop. People at LVMH thought Fendi was going to reach the same level of success of his Dior, but it didn’t. I don’t think he will last more than two years from now.
If I were a girl I’d love to buy Céline. It’s one of the few houses that is not vulgar. Chanel, Hermès, Dior, Balenciaga, Gucci, Fendi… Those houses are next level cheap atm.
I really think they should give Fendi men and women to Michele and Silvia. I don’t think Silvia is that strong as a menswear designer..Fendi is not performing that well. Kim Jones has been a flop. People at LVMH thought Fendi was going to reach the same level of success of his Dior, but it didn’t. I don’t think he will last more than two years from now.
If I were a girl I’d love to buy Céline. It’s one of the few houses that is not vulgar. Chanel, Hermès, Dior, Balenciaga, Gucci, Fendi… Those houses are next level cheap atm.
That's true, but 60s haute couture pieces are 60 yo now, and unless they had the proper conservation (restoration, anti-parasites, micro-vacuuming, anoxia, hygrometry, etc etc), they sometimes only hang by a thread, or the fabrics are deformed.You can get original 60s haute couture pieces for less than these reproductions will cost (and with more quality of fabrics, construction and details...plus, they are the original ones!!).
Chanel, Hermès, Dior, Balenciaga, Gucci, Fendi… Those houses are next level cheap atm.
Couture are probably those which are too complicated to mass-produce, especially the embroideries and the feathers... they probably never intended to produce them on a RTW scale so they just called it "couture", if they have clients willing to pay 40 to 50k a look, they'll take the order though.no shade but which looks are couture, to me everything looks like very well made rtw
That's true, but 60s haute couture pieces are 60 yo now, and unless they had the proper conservation (restoration, anti-parasites, micro-vacuuming, anoxia, hygrometry, etc etc), they sometimes only hang by a thread, or the fabrics are deformed.
Our museums consider textiles more fragile that drawings on paper.
An example: 1960s Givenchy Couture Silk Organza Blue Sheath Cocktail Dress For Sale at 1stDibs | givenchy 1960, givenchy cream sheath dress with capeletThat's true, but 60s haute couture pieces are 60 yo now, and unless they had the proper conservation (restoration, anti-parasites, micro-vacuuming, anoxia, hygrometry, etc etc), they sometimes only hang by a thread, or the fabrics are deformed.
Our museums consider textiles more fragile that drawings on paper.