im not sure its a fair comparison, comparing chanel for what they are known for, and possibly an heirloom piece to something that can be more "trendy" for valentino. After michele, will valentino still have tweed or is it gonna be back to frou dressess again.Valentino tweed jacket (with embroidery) vs. Chanel tweed jacket
9600AUD (Original Price) vs 20,790AUD
Both made in Italy, both using similar craftsmanship (I wouldn't be surprised if it were at the same factory) except the Valentino one has added embroidery.
View attachment 1442089
View attachment 1442090
VALENTINO & CHANEL
im not sure its a fair comparison, comparing chanel for what they are known for, and possibly an heirloom piece to something that can be more "trendy" for valentino. After michele, will valentino still have tweed or is it gonna be back to frou dressess again.
that's like comparing a birkin to whatever currrent discounted bag is. The trendy bag could be tons better and use more leather but its not a birkin.
im not sure its a fair comparison, comparing chanel for what they are known for, and possibly an heirloom piece to something that can be more "trendy" for valentino. After michele, will valentino still have tweed or is it gonna be back to frou dressess again.
that's like comparing a birkin to whatever currrent discounted bag is. The trendy bag could be tons better and use more leather but its not a birkin.


Chanel with Karl was just so good ❤️ Couture, ready-to-wear, accessories, communication, image, quality, everything. He knew how to run the business, even if he was not the CEO.
we can agree that people who pay for the Chanel piece are paying for the brand name exclusively
1000% the approach is now more conglomerate brand than a couture house /maison specialist in fine luxury hard and soft.Instead of cutting on the quality of the product, I would have rather seen them take a more secretive approach to their PR - More along the lines of Hermès or Celine under Hedi to emphasize the ultimate exclusivity rather than an embrace of too much inclusivity and pop-credibility.
When Karl did those larger than life runway shows in the Grand Palais with spaceships and icebergs, there was a sense of surprise and anticipation that also befitted his larger-than-life public persona - Now it merely feels like the new normal of Chanel, without second guessing the status quo.
You don't have to love the cut of Hedi‘s videos for Celine but to acknowledge it felt fresh to question the status quo of communication. People like Helmut Lang and Azzedine Alaia went a step further by challenging the dates of their collection presentations to their conditions - I don't see why Chanel couldn't bend the 'rules' to their liking.
I can admit that I would go for Chanel.we can agree that people who pay for the Chanel piece are paying for the brand name exclusively. It's total snobbery.
If it fits and is done well with seam allowance without falling sequins, etc. ;-)pretty much how luxury world goes. maybe a hand few would go to valentino for a tweed jacket but you can't dismiss that tweed jackets are synonymous to chanel. So unfortunatley they can price it however they want and people do collect them.
1000% the approach is now more conglomerate brand than a couture house /maison specialist in fine luxury hard and soft.
its giving nestle & LÓreal all about covering all market shares and demographics on the front end while product is subpar and driven by increasing margins cutting on high quality ingredients and manufacturing.
thats why the craft halo and individual gloss that Blazy brings is the perfect surface level front facing image they needed to distract from actual high margins on lower products being produced.
Actually the details are very different.Valentino tweed jacket (with embroidery) vs. Chanel tweed jacket
9600AUD (Original Price) vs 20,790AUD
Both made in Italy, both using similar craftsmanship (I wouldn't be surprised if it were at the same factory) except the Valentino one has added embroidery.
VALENTINO & CHANEL


I was reading the book "Line of Beauty" again the other day...Karl's Chanel was so solid partly because his design and ideas were solidly rooted in history. The foundation was strong. He made many historical references from design, to culture, to concepts, and many seemingly different looks have common elements rooted in specific culture in a specific age. There was generally cohesion within a collection.Chanel with Karl was just so good ❤️ Couture, ready-to-wear, accessories, communication, image, quality, everything. He knew how to run the business, even if he was not the CEO.
Right but none of it was pedantic or heavy, that's what I loved most about him, he wasn't full of himself. Drawing, coming up with ideas, it was just another thing for him. He was very open, he said the dumbest ideas were the best. Everything felt very spontaneous and easy with him. He wasn't making grand statements, he was just talking.I was reading the book "Line of Beauty" again the other day...Karl's Chanel was so solid partly because his design and ideas were solidly rooted in history. The foundation was strong. He made many historical references from design, to culture, to concepts, and many seemingly different looks have common elements rooted in specific culture in a specific age. There was generally cohesion within a collection.
He held a higher standard.
yes because it increases spending for the region its simple creating local events for high net worths to spend because it creates a buzz and competition among big spenders to place orders etc show off who can still spend in current climate ...also asia has different countries is not monolit of taste JAPAN KOREA CHINA are not the sameRemember when they had a second show in Russia for the Metiers D'Art Hamburg 2018? Russia no more I guess.
They keep holding basically every show in Asia, they had Cruise in Hong Kong few weeks before the subway show.
