Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
She has a 3 years contract and it was renewed in 2019. But I'm not sure, maybe LVMH will renew it again based on her commercial success. They did renew Nicolas's contract after all.
It is so Ralph Lauren... and so repetitive and dull palette.
nytimes.com/A Really Radical Fashion Idea
When is a cruise show not just a cruise show? Ask Maria Grazia Chiuri of Dior.
By Vanessa Friedman / June 17, 2022
I am beginning to think that Maria Grazia Chiuri, the artistic director of Dior women’s wear, may be the most subversively political, even radical, designer in charge of a big French fashion brand.
Not because of her clothes, which are perfectly pretty, if limited to a handful of familiar forms: full ballet skirts with nipped-in waists and crisp shirting; boy trousers and bar jackets; princess dresses. Or because of her sincere, if sometimes forced, feminism, which occasionally involves a message tee (or banner). But because of her approach.
At least her approach to her cruise shows, which has transformed a destination boondoggle for clients and critics (not this one: The New York Times does not accept free trips) into a destination boondoggle with purpose. Namely to argue, in the most gilded and glamorous terms, that the artisanal heritage of any number of cultures is the equivalent, in skill and value, to that of the Paris couture.
That the French don’t have a monopoly on embroidery and material creativity. That the somewhat derogatory, and often racist, dismissal of “craft” as not up to being considered a decorative art, is outdated and wrong. And that, you know, it’s time to build some bridges, take down the walls.
Zowie. In an industry long predicated on a hierarchy of taste handed down through the decades, that’s a pretty revolutionary idea.
In Ms. Chiuri’s hands, it’s also pretty convincing. Not to mention a much more resonant take on the current craze for collaboration that’s sweeping fashion than the usual you-market-my-back-I’ll-market-yours.
She has been hammering home this thesis consistently and insistently, through shows in Marrakesh, Athens and Puglia, all of which incorporated the work of a host of independent local artisans, whose contributions were listed not just in lengthy pamphlets that accompany each show, but also on the labels inside the garments. (Chanel also showcases the work of “specialist ateliers” in its Métiers d’Art shows, but the ateliers are majority French, and owned by Chanel.)
This season the case was made in Seville, Spain, with the work of seven local ateliers — specialists in hat-making, leatherwork, embroidery, fans and metalwork — as well as prints from the artist María Ángeles Vila Tortosa featured against the lavish backdrop of the Plaza de España, now filled with 250,000 crimson roses.
Also an orchestra led by the composer Alberto Iglesias, known for his work with Pedro Almodóvar, and a flamenco troupe with 40 dancers and two soloists under the direction of the choreographer Blanca Li. Plus, of course, some models wearing Ms. Chiuri’s signature Diorisms, filtered through a reference book of matadors and madonnas with the lingering sound of castanets echoing through the seams.
See, for example, pleated black trousers worn with suspenders over a white tank, and draped in a grandly fringed white lace shawl. Peg-leg pants piped in lace with a matching vest worn under a flat-brimmed hat. Skirts richly embroidered in the gold thread used to make vestments for religious ceremonies. Leather gloves, riding crops, belts and chaps.
And a host of jewel-tone, off-the-shoulder taffeta gowns that were a little less obvious than the finale of corseted infanta looks with silhouettes of La Capitana (Carmen Amaya, the first female flamenco dancer to wear a male uniform onstage) by Ms. Tortosa incorporated into the design.
You don’t have to get all the back stories to appreciate the clothes, even the ones that were a little too olé-tastic, but they are additive.
In a Zoom call before the show, I asked Ms. Chiuri why she had taken on this project. (Each cruise show takes six to eight months to prepare, which is significantly more time intensive than a regular ready-to-wear collection.)
“First, it is just a pleasure,” she said. “Second, it’s a responsibility.” Then she said, “If I don’t do it, who can?”
Editing of the video is simply tragic. Too much of musicants, dancers in disgusting skirts, side views and panoramas, no focusing on collection at all
what's the commercial idea behind doing so many looks on the runway?
is it just so they can sell almost the entire collection as 'seen on the runway'?
Review from Vanessa Friedman of The New York Times.
nytimes.com/
where can we see this again?You mean like when he was high as a kite while being interviewed by Tim Blanks after his flamenco/dance collection for Dior?
no way this has classOn second look… this collection feels more Dolce & Gabbana than Dior
Great production doesn't mean anything if the clothes are not the focus.
This is a great collection. Some looks are really strong. But it gets drowned in 110 looks. I hate when designers sent out more than 100 looks. She has the same problem with Alessandro at Gucci, they don't know how to edit, so they just sent out every single idea that they have.
Cut this collection in half, edit out all those same looks but in different colors, and with better styling. It's can be even better.
This just proved that it's difficult to balance between big production and still make your clothes capture the attention of the audience. Karl is a master of that, no matter how big the production is, his clothes had never been outshined by the set.
Considering this is her last year, I wish she would take more risks.