Clothes and Sexualization in Young Girls--BBC Article | the Fashion Spot

Clothes and Sexualization in Young Girls--BBC Article

Melisande

Active Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
3
The examples of "sexualization" given in this article all have to do with fashion. Opinions?
==========================================


Sexualisation 'Harms' Young Girls

The media's portrayal of young women as sex objects harms girls' mental and physical health, US experts warn.
Magazines, television, video games and music videos all have a detrimental effect, a task force from the American Psychological Association reported.

Sexualisation can lead to a lack of confidence with their bodies as well as depression and eating disorders.

Such images also have a negative effect on healthy sexual development in girls, the researchers said.

The task force was set up after mounting "public concern" about the sexualisation of young girls.


EXAMPLES OF SEXUALISATION
Young pop stars dressed as sex objects
Dolls aimed at young girls with sexual clothing such as fishnet tights
Clothing, such as thongs, for seven to 10-year-olds
Adult models dressed as young girls

Research on the content and effects of television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, films, video games and the internet was analysed.

Recent advertising campaigns and merchandising of products aimed at girls was also scrutinised.

Sexualisation was defined as occurring when a person's value comes only from her or his sexual appeal or behaviour, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person portrayed purely as a sex object.

They gave examples of a trainer advert that featured pop star Christina Aguilera dressed as a schoolgirl with her shirt unbuttoned, licking a lollipop.

According to the research identified by the task force, such images and promotion of girls as sexual objects negatively affects young girls in many ways.

"The consequences of the sexualisation of girls in media today are very real," said Dr Eileen Zurbriggen, chair of the group and associate professor of psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

"We have ample evidence to conclude that sexualisation has negative effects in a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning, physical and mental health, and healthy sexual development."

The task force called on parents, school officials, and health professionals to be alert for the potential impact on girls and young women.

And it advised that schools should teach pupils media literacy skills and should include information on the negative effects of images portraying girls as sex objects in sex education programmes.

Governments also had a responsibility to reduce the use of sexualised images in the media and advertising, they said.

Teenage magazines

Dr Zurbriggen added: "As a society, we need to replace all of these sexualised images with ones showing girls in positive settings - ones that show the uniqueness and competence of girls.

"The goal should be to deliver messages to all adolescents - boys and girls - that lead to healthy sexual development."

Professor Andrew Hill, professor of medical psychology at the University of Leeds, said it was hard to disagree with any of the reports conclusions.

"If you look at teenage magazines, it's all about sex.

"We are a visually absorbed society - our views of people are dominated by how they look."

He added that the use of women as sex objects in the media and advertising was a difficult issue to deal with.

"Only 18% of children's television viewing is in their designated viewing time and legislation can't be the answer for everything.

"One of the key things here is social responsibility - advertisers and other media need to be aware that the products they produce and images associated with them have an impact and it's not always a good impact," he said.
 
[QUOTE/]EXAMPLES OF SEXUALISATION
Young pop stars dressed as sex objects
Dolls aimed at young girls with sexual clothing such as fishnet tights
Clothing, such as thongs, for seven to 10-year-olds
Adult models dressed as young girls

[/QUOTE]

Of course this article raises a crucial issue, and I'm all for fostering healthy sexual self-image. But I'm just not sure I agree with these examples, or if fashion has to do with this issue at all. Wouldn't this sort of fashion-related repression and bias have the opposite effect? Doesn't sexualization have more to do with the tone/intent of the image/publication than fashion per se?

How do you think fashion affects the development of a girl's identity as a woman?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, this sexualisation has had a bad effect on me. I thought it was all great when I was ten/twelve. I believed it was right. My sexual identity was totally screwed up for a long time. I am now on anti-depressants and have had major problems with my body and sexuality. I have just recently realised the link that all this sex everywhere had on this... and I wish there would never have been it. I don't believe sex should be in the life of little girls. I do believe that educating people to develop a healthy sexuality from a young age is important, but this is definetily not it. I wish more than anything that this would not exist. If I only would've known it was BS and known how it can screw up my mind. So yes, to answer your question, fashion / media does affect the development of a girl's identity and development to a woman.

I don't think fashion is all to blame for this, media also plays a big part. Something is wrong with our society that these two areas are full of this.

I don't think sex should be a taboo. Developing a healthy sexuality is important, and sexuality is an important part of a person. However, having sex coming from every place (clothes, magazines, tv, films... ) is not that. Media makes sex to be something other than what it is at it's healthiest (which I imagine to be a connection between two people who love each other and want to make each other feel good? ). By media's standards, people should be having sex all the time, with people they don't know. Everyone should be thinking about sex all the time, dressing to attract the possible sex partners and just making sure with every part of their action that they are "sexy". I don't think this has anything to do with healthy sex.

As for how this overflowing of sex affects girls. I don't think there should be so much sex (especially this kind of "wrong" image of sex) everywhere, as young girls cannot understand it and take it as the real image of sex. I think sex and sexuality is important, but media makes it look like sex is the biggest thing in one's life. Sex is nothing but a recyclable act between Barbie and Ken dolls if we believe today's media. Sexuality means revealing clothing and big boobs. I've always though sex was more about feelings than just a mechanical act.

I think we should really stop to think what this sexualisation of our society does. I don't think it is healthy for anyone.
 
WhiteLinen, Thank you so much for sharing. I think your views are so important, and I'm sorry you had to deal with all that you've gone through.
I hope people really understand that although we all think we are not affected, we ARE, even without our realizing it.
 
Thanks for the nice words :flower: And yes, I think it is true that we don't notice how all of this is affecting us. Nothing is private anymore, nothing shocks and we get numb because of it.
 
You're right on many points WhiteLinen.

Whenever I'm out on the town I see young girls barely dressed. Everything is on display. See, it's easy to say it's just dressing up but the whole purpose of it is to seek male attention and approval, to look 'sexy' because sexy isn't anything other than putting yourself up for display.

It's sad.
 
^ I did that when I was around ten to thirteen. I dressed up in high heels, miniskirts, fishnet stockings, tight tops, a lot of make-up etc. People thought it was just a development stage, rebelling etc. I thought that too. In reality it was all about male attention. I got male attention that way. I thought it was right.
 
What strikes me about what you say, whitelinen, is that you dressed for men. That's interesting to me because when I've spoken about this with a lot of my teenage friends who are also interested in fashion, we've come to the conclusion that though we look nice for guys, we go a step furthur into incorporating what is in style for eachover. That makes me think, just based on my own perceptions, of course, that though media is very much to blame for over-sexualization, it really isn't the fashion industry itself, per se.
If any of you have ever read At The Back of the North Wind, do you remember when the North Wind explains to the little boy that if he's not with her, she'll be very cold and harsh to him, but when he is with her, he'll feel safe, protected, and comfortable because he is a part of her, this great power? To me, that's the fashion industry. If I were casually into fashion and looking good, I could see myself being swept up in just 'looking hot', emulating Brittany Spears and those on the very margins because I, too, would be on the margins of this world. But I think because I have more of an interest in the fashion world as a whole, I see fashion and myself more as art. It's given me a different perspective. Instead of feeling pressure to be model thin to be sexy, I understand it is an asthetic look which is part of their job in the industry. Instead of showing gratuitous amounts of skin, I understand the alluring power of back or shoulder. I think that simply because of fashion, I approch style and myself in a completely different way.
 
As a teen, I totally knows how overwhelming fashion = sex is in the media. I use to be heavily influenced by the media image of dressing for your body, show off the best part of your body, clothes is the wrapping paper for your body, show some cleavage, guys prefere X style. Fashion was deemed to be attractive, not beautiful/ugly.
Until I joined this site for awhile, I realized the fatuity of the media mantra "dress for you body". Sexualization in clothing completely sullied fashion by covering authentic fashion, as a form of art or a reflection of life.

Just my two cents.
 
I've been looking at things that minors are by law not allowed to look at since I was twelve or younger. I turned out fine.
I think it's only a problem when the sex kids are exposed to has something really bad about--like when women are portrayed as sex toys for men. It's not the sex that's harmful, but the inequality.
 
Bel said:
It's not the sex that's harmful, but the inequality.

I agree. Sex is natural and nothing to be avoided or feared as long as it comes with correct information and healthy attitudes.

Moreover, I don't think fishnet stockings, makeup, or even nudity is at fault.
These are neutral things which can be applied in a wholesome or artistic way, which ironically, I think the fashion industry often does illustrate.

What is utterly perverse is the attitude that topless girls are "sexual" while topless boys are deemed athletic and wholesome. Far from protecting minors, this attitude poisons them.
 
I know what you mean. When I was 10-12, actually up until late high school, my parents were VERY selective of my wardrobe and while they let me pick out things they ultimately had the final say...they were trying to shelter me. Then around sophomore year I rebelled in a big way and while I did wear promiscuous clothing, it was well-known that I wasn't engaging in any of those kinds of behaviours. I'm kind of the antithesis to the Barbie/Ken analogy brought up because yes, I have big boobs. Yes, I wear revealing clothing. But I've never even gotten close to kissing a guy, let alone dating.

However the thing about the taboo of toplessness isn't about to change anytime soon. It's as much a part of American culture it seems as baseball and Black Friday.
 
Melisande said:
I agree. Sex is natural and nothing to be avoided or feared as long as it comes with correct information and healthy attitudes.

Moreover, I don't think fishnet stockings, makeup, or even nudity is at fault.
These are neutral things which can be applied in a wholesome or artistic way, which ironically, I think the fashion industry often does illustrate.

What is utterly perverse is the attitude that topless girls are "sexual" while topless boys are deemed athletic and wholesome. Far from protecting minors, this attitude poisons them.

I agree that sex and nudity is natural etc, and there's no harm in showing it. However, I think at the moment they are showing too much of it. I think there should be balance in everything, quality not the quantity. I think media makes sex seem like it's the most important thing in person's life. They are overdoing it.
 
i don't think sexualization is 100% correlated with actual sex
when i was preteen-aged, i used to run around looking and acting like a little wh*re, but i never actually had sex. it was just fun (then, looking back i kind of wished i didn't...)
i think that's the danger of it. when you're that young, you don't understand the significance of what you're doing (i didn't), which makes it really easy for older guys to exploit you.
has anyone seen Little Miss Sunshine? it's kind of like that i think.
 
BaroqueRockstar said:
i don't think sexualization is 100% correlated with actual sex
when i was preteen-aged, i used to run around looking and acting like a little wh*re, but i never actually had sex. it was just fun (then, looking back i kind of wished i didn't...)
i think that's the danger of it. when you're that young, you don't understand the significance of what you're doing (i didn't), which makes it really easy for older guys to exploit you.
has anyone seen Little Miss Sunshine? it's kind of like that i think.

I know what you mean, I was exactly the same... and it did not help me to understand my sexuality now when I am older. I didn't have any sex either, but I got a lot of comments... and now when I have realised those comments might not have been something a woman should be glad about receiving, I can't help but have lost my faith in men. I'm trying to correct this though.
 
The whole issue stems in many directions. If it is to blame for why certain teenage girls will dress and act the way they do, then it is easily to blame why older women will get plastic surgery. The media use its explicit freedom to show what is within not being fined...I ultimately think it is up to parents to explain to their children to not be ashamed of their bodies or sex or each other enough to have enough pride in their differences or uncertainties. I teach at an elementary school during the day, and sometimes these little girls come to school wearing heels (or plastic clear heels sometimes, yuck). I find it hard to believe that a second grader made a conscious desicion to wear them to school and realized what the connotation are (of the shoes or any other provocative clothing).

I know that once I left home for college I tried to dress "sexy" to get guys' attention. I realized it was only brining bad attention towards me. When I met my boyfriend, I was so frumpalicious, he didnt care though.

There is an oversexualization of media outlets, and we cant rely on them to police themselves, we have to do it. If we can balance the negative with positives...then we can eventually eradicate the negatives.
 
I think someone has to do that for children; the parents. Also I think certain bans should be there... I mean, why do you need to sell children something with an image from Playboy?
 
I once saw a girl of about six or seven who was with her mom at a mall. The girl was wearing tight gym pants and a tight cropped top. Her hair was straightened (she was black) and she had a huge ponytail extension attached to her hair. You could just see the pride on her mother's face. I wondered whether my disapproval stemmed from my age and that this was merely a sign of the times. Our country is now big on issues of women empowerment; I just don't see how girls like these will be empowered unless they are fortunate enough to meet positive role models. I don't know, maybe I am too old!
 
While I am in no way in support of the sexualization of little girls, I don't think marketing firms and music video producers are to blame. Least of all the fashion industry. Imagine ad campaigns and music videos and movies and magazines with no sexual influences. How drab and sterile. Dolce and Gabbana, Gucci, heck even, Jergens body lotion ads wouldn't exist. A lot of these things are not marketed towards little girls in the first place. When I was a little girl I read American Girl magazine, not Cosmo. I didn't start reading teen magazines until I was 13/14 and then it was TEEN and SEVENTEEN which are pretty innocent and focused on trends and teen fashion and silly quizzes (I loved those quizzes!:p) . I didn't move on to VOGUE or Cosmo or Elle until later in High School. I wasn't sexually active until I turned 17. Of course now I focus more on fashion mags but that's not what we're talking about. My point is just that you can live in society as a little girl and be a little girl. I wasn't overly sheltered or overly independent. I think if the little girls have good friendships and supportive parents and is valued for her individuality and unique talents that is much more influential than whatever she might see in the media.
 
But the times you (even I) grew up in are almost completely different, in the span of just a few years.

If if it not caused by media, then how? You cant explain a whole planet experiencing these things organically without realizing that it is the images we are bombarded with. Sex sells is what they say in the advertising world. Products are over sexualized to make them sell. From soft drinks to cleaning products. Why would Pepsi/Coke use Cristina Aguilera/Britney Spears otherwise?

And yes, I am all for empowerment of women. I believe I have the right to dress the exact way I choose to day in and day out, without having to feel like a sexual creature and have any man undermine me. Children should not be taught to be emberrased of their bodies or sex. But they should be shown how to judge for themselves the negative rolemodels in life and make desicions about how to view them. And yes, this needs to be done by parents or older siblings even teachers. If no one is going to show them right from wrong, how are they supposed to know? As a society, we need to empower each other.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
216,523
Messages
15,342,350
Members
90,207
Latest member
randorando
Back
Top