so ... am i the only one who's getting pretty clear homophobic implications from this bit here. cause the writer's opinion essentially translates to, "guys who experiment with their sexuality aren't clearly men." ..
idiot.
anyway - aside from that little moment -- the rest of the interview proved insightful and interesting (if only a little worshipful).
David comes across as a great guy. he's just so devastatingly gorgeous, i honestly can't even imagine what it must be like to look into those eyes
in person. he would certainly be startling, his beauty is so undeniable.
I also got a little irritated when I got to this part, but on the other hand i understand the writer pretty well...he talk about some male models and probably not about all men and boys in general. Sure there are some stereotypes concerning men and I agree with it...men should play sports and look like Gandy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f7e5/9f7e5eaddfe04cccc1077f948a9d4c1651913ae6" alt="wink ;) ;)"
) Of course they should not be straight, but the writer meant more about those people with confused sexuality. We will always get homophobic implications from such articles and for a gay men to read such material do not make them feel very good about it...but for example when i went to a few shows(balenciaga for example) in Milan, i wanted to puke when i looked at most of the boys doing the show...most of them looked disgusting! It is great that guys like David are in the spotlight, cause they can really show what real men should be like!
I looked at those blue eyes a few times in person and they are really striking...even on the photos I take, so this is one of the things about David that make him so special...here is a little proof, picture taken by me: