Donatella Versace - Designer, Creative Director of Versace

I don't think that people really want the Versace aesthetics right now. Marc Jacobs thought it was funny to borrow a bit of Gianni for this summer's Louis Vuitton collection, but what did he do next? He went all Yohji for fall! Donatella's new look just seems like a desperate attempt to bring the label back to date. The old customers have moved on to other brands (Dolce&Gabbana, Cavalli...) and their accessories don't bring that much money in either, which doesn't really surprise me because the bags and shoes look like they're made for tax free shops and outlet malls. Instead of opening new stores they're closing the old ones. Dolce&Gabbana must have made so much money out of Versace's misery. I was never a big fan of theirs either, but surely the Sicilian widow look and mannish trouser suits were nicer than the glitzy crap they're doing nowadays...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tuomas said:
I don't think that people really want the Versace aesthetics right now. Marc Jacobs thought it was funny to borrow a bit of Gianni for this summer's Louis Vuitton collection, but what did he do next? He went all Yohji for fall!
Donatella's new look just seems like a desperate attempt to bring the label back to date. The old customers have moved on to other brands (Dolce&Gabbana, Cavalli...) and their accessories don't bring that much money in either. Instead of opening new stores they're closing the old ones. Dolce&Gabbana must have made so much money out of Versace's misery. I was never a big fan of theirs either, but surely the Sicilian widow look and mannish trouser suits were nice than the glitzy crap they're doing nowadays...


If she didn't bring the collection up to date, then it wouldn't sell, thus it would put Versace into deeper debt...and she has been reviving the house and the look for several seasons now. As for Marc Jacobs, designers change their inspiration every season, it's not a matter of him thinking it would be funny to mock Versace and then toss it to the side. He went with a mood for the season, and the mood obviously changed the next season
 
I found this on vogue.co.uk

GIANNI VERSACE SPA is back in the black. The Italian fashion house, which struggled in the years following its founder's death, managed to break even a year and a half before its original target. It now expects full-year sales to be "above" £183 million, according to chief executive Giancarlo Di Risio.
 
I posted an article in a different thread and it said that accessories made up for a large part of Versace's profits believe it or not. I mean my Versace is one of my favorites but even I'll admit their accessories suck. But as far as keeping the old Versace customer, since Versace was sinking into the red, they had to do something and if that means changing your customer base, then so-be-it. It's about money. I think they are on the right track now as far as staying relevant. They are starting to appeal to the everyday customer more and have a strong prescence with celebs while it used to be that they only had a prescence with celebs.
 
^ i think accessories is how majority of the major fashion houses make their money
 
Their knee high boots seems to be the fav with the celeb this season!

:heart:
 
fuchimama said:
I may be the only one but I have become disillusioned with Versace as of late. Fashion needs contrasts- we need Versace's color-drenched temptress just as much as we need Prada's globe-trotting female-nerd, or Nicholas Ghesquiere's edgy Parisian doll.

With Versace resorting to safe looks that are closer to the mainstream, a vital portion of fashion is being underrepresented. Who's going to champion sexuality now?

well said! to each thier own, there is no such thing as "good taste"
 
At Versace, Fashion Is So Last Century

CEO Moves Past Clothes,
Emphasizes Lifestyle Goods;
Donatella Takes a Step Back
By STACY MEICHTRY
MILAN -- When Italian fashion house Gianni Versace SpA recently threw a cocktail party in the courtyard of its 16th-century palazzo to promote its latest creations, designer Donatella Versace ducked out of the soiree early, flanked by bodyguards.
Instead, Giancarlo Di Risio, Versace's bespectacled chief executive, presided over an evening that highlighted luxury goods: Parked at one end of the courtyard was a half-million-dollar Lamborghini Murciélago with a black-and-white leather interior by Versace. A huge poster showed an AgustaWestland helicopter with a Versace-designed cabin. Stacked nearby was luggage embossed with the brand's Greek motif, with pieces starting at about $4,000.
Mr. Di Risio is trying to shift Versace's attention away from clothes and to accessories, home interiors and other lifestyle products that will bring in new streams of revenue and offset fickle fashion cycles. "Fashion does not exist at Versace," he said, describing his strategy in an interview before the reception.
The new approach is bearing fruit. Versace swung back into the black last year, posting a $25.4 million profit after years of losses, and has shaken off millions in debt. Driving that turnaround were rising sales in the lucrative accessories Mr. Di Risio is pushing.
Yet the effects of the makeover have touched the core of the company's identity. Ms. Versace has begun taming the flamboyant clothing designs that once set her and the fashion house apart from the crowd. "I no longer recognize myself in that kind of woman," the 52-year-old Ms. Versace said in a telephone interview.
The culture shift at Versace highlights how an increasingly competitive fashion industry is forcing even the most freewheeling players to embrace a corporate culture. Many labels, including LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton's smaller brands like Celine and Marc Jacobs, have also been toning down their looks to appeal to a wider swath of consumers. Designers who once called the shots are ceding authority to executives who run the numbers.
"In the beginning, it was a shock for me," Ms. Versace said. "When you tell a person who is used to being in power -- to saying yes or no on everything -- to take a step back, it's not easy. But it was necessary."
Tweaking a label's aesthetics carries risks. If pushed too far, transformations risk alienating loyal customers, says Robert Burke, head of New York-based luxury-goods consultancy Robert Burke Associates and the former fashion director at Bergdorf Goodman. "You will always want to see a fashion edge to Versace," he says.
Yet for family-owned fashion labels like Versace, pressure to make more money is high. They compete with publicly traded conglomerates such as LVMH and PPR SA's Gucci Group, which have the financial heft to expand with stores in the emerging markets of China, India and Russia -- seen as fueling the industry's growth.
A number of Italy's top family-owned fashion houses, including Versace, Prada SpA and Salvatore Ferragamo SpA, are considering stock-market listings in the next couple of years. "An IPO would be the best way to raise money and implant in these countries," says Peter Farren, a luxury-goods analyst at the French investment firm Bryan Garnier.
At Versace, a sobering realization is spurring Mr. Di Risio's moves: The clothes that once made the brand are now struggling to make money.
In its heyday in the early 1990s, Versace stayed ahead of the fashion mainstream with lavish catwalk shows that celebrated the racy designs of founder Gianni Versace. The label amassed collections of real estate and artwork that enhanced the family's jet-setter status.
The company found it increasingly tough to squeeze profits out of highly perishable fashions as production costs rose in Italy. In 1997, Mr. Versace was murdered outside his Miami villa. The firm's finances went into a tailspin, and it was forced to shelve plans to go public. Mr. Versace's 50% stake in the label went to his niece, Ms. Versace's then-preteen daughter Allegra Versace Beck, shifting the balance of power. Though Ms. Versace owns only 20% of the company, she was seen to exert huge influence because of her daughter's stake. A third sibling, Santo Versace, owns the remaining 30% of the company. Ms. Versace Beck, now 20 years old, manages her stake with the help of advisers.
The Versace stakeholders decided the company needed a CEO who could turn the company around. Fabio Cacciatori, at one time an outside financial consultant for the company, became CEO in September 2003 but resigned in December. The company named Versace's then-Chief Financial Officer Daniele Ballestrazzi interim CEO as it searched for new leadership.
When Versace recruited Mr. Di Risio from LVMH's Fendi label in the summer of 2004, the house was saddled with more than $146 million in debt and heading to a net loss of $124 million for the year, on revenue of $416 million. High-end retailers like Bergdorf Goodman had stopped carrying the brand.
Bergdorf Chief Executive Jim Gold recalls that Versace was distributing too widely, diluting its exclusivity, and was overly consumed with making a splash on the runway. While many labels had started delivering retailers fresh designs more frequently, ahead of the runway collections, Versace resisted.
Mr. Di Risio arrived with a new mantra. Clothing that is too fashionable, he told his lieutenants, is bad for business because it eats up capital and goes out of style quickly. Accessories and other leather goods are a better bet because they have a longer shelf life and fatter profit margins.
To reduce Versace's dependence on fashion, Mr. Di Risio shut down lines such as Versace Intimates lingerie and Versace Young, a children's line. The company sold its unprofitable perfume, jewelry and watchmaking divisions, replacing them with lucrative licensing agreements with U.S. watch group Timex Corp. and Italian perfume and cosmetics maker EuroItalia Srl.
Mr. Di Risio homed in on the company's shoes and handbags, which have higher profit margins because they cost less to produce than clothes but are easier to sell to a wide array of customers. Last year, more than 30% of Versace's $383 million in revenue came from accessories, compared with 4% when Mr. Di Risio arrived.
He also expanded the label's push into home furnishings -- a business that generated sales of $82.5 million in 2006, up 55% from the year before. Versace recently unveiled its "Jet Seat," an aerodynamically-styled leather chair in a high-tech ceramic frame that is sold in Europe for €38,000 (about $50,000).
"It was like taking a blank page and rewriting everything," Mr. Di Risio says.
To succeed, however, he had to get Ms. Versace on board. She had hoped to resurrect the costly haute-couture fashion shows the label had discontinued before Mr. Di Risio's arrival. But he argued she could more effectively enhance the line's exclusivity by holding showings for individual clients.
"I said to Di Risio, 'This is not going to work. This is going to die,'" recalled Ms. Versace. But, she said, "I was wrong, and he was right. We sell more now."
Ms. Versace had to become more conscious of how much time and money the label invests in promoting designs at events like the Oscars. Last year, the designer dressed actresses Hilary Swank, Uma Thurman and Salma Hayek and director Robert Altman's wife, Kathryn Reed Altman, who donned a navy-blue sequin gown.
This year, however, Ms. Versace limited herself to one gown, designing a rose-colored dress with a sweeping train for best-actress nominee Penelope Cruz.
For Versace's ready-to-wear line, Ms. Versace is going for looks she calls "a little more understated." Bergdorf Goodman will carry her designs in the fall for the first time in years.
Ms. Versace is also working more closely with retailers, adding four more collections beyond the traditional spring and fall runway collections. These are shown to retailers in private visits, giving them a preview of what to expect.
On the financial side, Mr. Di Risio has untangled the company's assets from those of the family, selling property he deemed "nonstrategic" to pay the company's debts. The family's Manhattan townhouse was sold for about $35 million, and its contents went up for auction in 2005. The paintings alone -- including works by artists Andy Warhol, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Roy Lichtenstein and Julian Schnabel -- fetched more than $11 million dollars.
Flagship stores in New York, London and Milan that Mr. Di Risio described as "decadent and sad," were redone with sleek, minimalist designs.The label, which operates 82 stores and has 35 franchise operations, plans to open more than 10 boutiques by the end of the year, including seven stores in China alone. When Versace opened the doors of its updated Moscow boutique in April, an array of leather bags, belts and shoes greeted customers at the store's lacquered ground-floor entrance. The label's ready-to-wear collection was relegated to the upper floor
story and images from wsj.com
</H1>
 

Attachments

  • vs1.jpg
    vs1.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 91
  • vs2.jpg
    vs2.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 92
  • vs3.jpg
    vs3.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 91
Oh, lovely. They really shouldn't say that they are more interested in the bottom line than the clothing Versace is famous for. It's a slippery slope to massive licensing...
 
The Versace store on Fifth Ave is ALWAYS empty!! It's so sad because it's a really beautiful place to shop.
 
sounds like this guy is right on target...
there is hope for versace yet...

so maybe this explains a bit better the move to bring plokhov in as design consultant...


thanks lucy...:flower:
 
I like Versace's wider lifestyle approach, it's cool. I just hope they don't dump fashion. After all that's what made Versace famous.
 
Honestly, I have no idea what this would fall under, the caption reads
"Versace & Chopard Fashion show at The Opening Night Party for 4th Annual Bahamas International Film Festival held at the Ocean Club Resort on December 7, 2007 in Nassau, Bahamas."

anywho, fabulous pictures from wireimage!

ishackimagehc7.jpg
ishackimagebd4.jpg
ishackimagefo3.jpg
ishackimagerb4.jpg
ishackimagejj4.jpg
ishackimagemq4.jpg
 
(George Pimentel/WireImage.com)

ishackimagege6.jpg
ishackimagefn4.jpg
ishackimagelf3.jpg
ishackimagelh9.jpg
ishackimagetu8.jpg
ishackimageql8.jpg


:flower:

is this even HQ worthy? I can get them but wonder if it's even worth my time :rolleyes:
 
Some of these girls look gorgeous! Well the first girl is. The clothes look so much better here than at the actual show.
Versace and Chopard? It's a good collaboration.
 
I'm impressed at how well the clothes look even under the harsh lighting. At the same time, however, I wonder why this show was even held, given that it's the exact collection shown just two months ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top