Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process.
More info here
most of those examples are from couture and couture, by it's nature IS massimalism. It is the trends and ideas in their wildest unrefined form.
i don't really feel that this is a tread.
and also many of the designers; someone mentioned Chayalan are really quite minimalist, with beautiful cutting and structure.Another good example would be Nicholas Ghesquire who also is quite avant garde (that is clean and non frilly)
they might look couture but these looks are all ready to wear.. if the designers chose to put these looks in ready to wear then we have to take their opinion on this.. Ofcourse the line between couture and ready to wear is becoming extremly thin
this thread is simply for the overly detailed clothes and cuts as opposed to the minimalistic look, and if minimalism can be considered a trend why can't this?
why I called it massimalism and not couture is because massimalism seemed like a better word imo
^ what about using the word 'decorative' in the title?
whenever we notice a rise in minimalism, there is always some uber-decorative trend to even things out and make everyone happy
I guess I could explain myself. I know that not all extravagance is couture. Many couture pieces are not extravagant at all. It is just the concept that comes to my mind. Embellishment does sound like the right term. Heatherette is a good example. Lots of embellishment, nowhere near couture, or nice for that matter.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.