Emily DiDonato

^ :buzz: She's drop dead gorgeous! I get what you're saying Mermaid but it's more work and exposure for her so that's good, just shame on VS :judge:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
emilydidonato1 on instagram
On way to "Good Day NY"
7fJEab5.jpg

RPDWslo.jpg
 
I suppose with SI a certain amount of tackiness is to be expected...but all things considered she really does look beyond gorgeous!! :blush::heart:

...A lesser model would have murdered that hideous green bathing suit!! :ninja:
 
Sports Illustrated Celebrates SI Swimsuit 2013 in NYC 2/12/13
D7G7zRq.jpg

u7ldz.png

emily didonato tumblr.com
emilydidonato1 on instagram
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think height could be a reason she didnt do VS again? I noticed SI is more acceptable of "shorter" models. She doesnt seem extremely statuesque. such a pity because I think shes better than the current SI aesthetic...if she's losing that poll well she has a more pure,classy innocent type of beauty like Doutzen which doesnt seem to latch on with alot of men... I think most SI readers prefer raunchy/in your face.
 
Well Barbara Palvin is definitely shorter then Emily and they worked with her a lot
I am very suprised to see her in Si
She has an angelic exquisite beauty,not for man mag with tacky blonde on the cover
She looks expensive and most of SI girls...not that really
Anyway she reminds me of Laetitia Casta a little,and she worked with SI in her prime back then and was a pure lust
 
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Launch Party - February 12, 2013

[FONT=&quot]tlfan.to[/FONT]
 
I always visit this thread but its my first time posting & I gotta say she's a gorgeous, as you all already know:lol:. She is too classy for SI but she kills it none the less:blush:..


I know she's a big money girl & doesn't need to do it but i'd looove to see her do a select handful of major high fashion show.. Can you imagine that face at Dior, Gucci, Versace, Dolce & Chanel:shock:.. ugh, i'd die.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's still last on the Rookie of the year poll.
This upsets me! :(:cry:

...I'm gonna bite my tongue and not say anything about the girl that's in the lead. :ninja:
 
She's still last on the Rookie of the year poll.
This upsets me! :(:cry:

...I'm gonna bite my tongue and not say anything about the girl that's in the lead. :ninja:

I noticed that too! I have a suspicion that the poll is rigged and possibly by agents/managers/friends. Winning that poll can bring a lot of exposure and is a huge incentive to mother agents and bookers. The girl in the lead has multiple managements behind her..

I also think that because Emily has more man-friendly traits than the girl in the lead like say boobs.
 
Emily def was the one who brought class to SI! She should be the rookie of the year if not it is def rigged.
Posted via Mobile Device
 
Do you think height could be a reason she didnt do VS again? I noticed SI is more acceptable of "shorter" models. She doesnt seem extremely statuesque. such a pity because I think shes better than the current SI aesthetic...if she's losing that poll well she has a more pure,classy innocent type of beauty like Doutzen which doesnt seem to latch on with alot of men... I think most SI readers prefer raunchy/in your face.

I agree here. SI is so tacky amateur p*rn. That is why some models have quit and didn't shoot for them again :innocent: Emily is too good for SI but she managed to look classy Kayt Jones did well with her.
Posted via Mobile Device
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,150
Messages
15,211,918
Members
87,095
Latest member
prostheticmemory
Back
Top