Eniko Mihalik

[pipoca]

It's a repost, but it was never posted in HQ:

Harper's Bazaar US (March 2010)
"Global Warming"
Photographer: Peter Lindbergh
Model: Eniko Mihalik

community.livejournal.com/noirfacade

 

[wickedcrazyness]

^Love the Harper's Bazaar ed! Except for maybe the hairdo!

Can't wait to see the Vogue Italia editorial!

 

[ParadEyes]

Dear Eniko, I swear you are NOT the only woman who has boobs.

 

[models_vlada]

the poses are really bad/unnatural/forced, so this does not fall in the artsy nude category for me.

i think it's bordering on p*rn.

I tottally agree

 

[pipoca]

Dear Eniko, I swear you are NOT the only woman who has boobs.

But it's not every woman who has such beautiful boobs.

I completely disagree with all the "p*rn" coments. Maybe it's a little bit tasteless for some people, but I think it's far from p*rn.

 

[Fantomette]

I doubt people even noticed the jewelry on the moving pictures. This Nowness editorial maybe be bordering on erotica but certainly not on p*rn.

 

[ParadEyes]

^I for one don't find her boobs "beautiful" -or so groundbreaking that she MUST constantly flash them. But then again this is not the issue here.. Eniko has a much greater potential in her face and character. but it's almost gone to waste.
perhaps I should give up the hope of Eniko overcoming her tasteless phase. *sigh

 

[ParadEyes]

I doubt people even noticed the jewelry on the moving pictures. This Nowness editorial maybe be bordering on erotica but certainly not on p*rn.

I'm interested to know what makes you think it's "erotica but certainly not on p*rn".

 

[Carla-A]

Eniko's on the cover of the newest issue of Antidote Magazine.



Antidote Magazine / Facebook

 

[wickedcrazyness]

^Very pretty.

 

[Unknownpleasures]

I'm interested to know what makes you think it's "erotica but certainly not on p*rn".

p*rn = Suggestive faces & vaginas.
Erotica is a bit more classy.

 

[Fantomette]

I'm interested to know what makes you think it's "erotica but certainly not on p*rn".

Well it was only my opinion of course. I don't know any definition that differentiate p*rn*gr*phy and eroticism, the frontier between the two genres seems fuzzy and depends on many factors. The fact is that on a juridical angle a thing is considered as pornographical when it shows real and non-simulated sexual acts. I see it as material whom only aim is to excite people and where sex is always explicit. In erotica material sex is more symbolic or suggestive and authors will add some emotion, purpose, art...
I remember a french director who once said «the difference between p*rn*gr*phy and eroticism is the lighting» lol.

Personally some pics by Terry Richardson makes me wonder about p*rn*gr*phy in fashion but not this last editorial of Eniko being topless again. It is not X but I'm indeed wondering about its erotica nature. The fact that we previously saw moving images from that set showing Eniko caressing her breasts didn't help.

Edit: Yeah, what Unknownpleasures said basically lol.

 

[The_Ida]

I completely disagree with all the "p*rn" coments. Maybe it's a little bit tasteless for some people, but I think it's far from p*rn.

Just because it's sleezy doesn't make it p*rn There needs to be some form of sexual act going on before I'd call it p*rn (and before I'd feel dirty for looking ). Eniko grabbing her boob just doesn't cut it for me

 

[ffffred]

There is no work of art on earth more beautiful than a woman's body. There is nothing "sleazy" about it. If you are offended by simple nudity - a woman crossing her arms - then perhaps you should consider becoming an orthodox Mormon and wearing head-to-toe body suit every day.

 

[Melly5525]

^amen lol, love the Antidote cover, the face of an angel.

 

[Decalion]

Eniko needs to be in a high quality p*rno flick directed by Terry Richardson and starring yours truly!

 

[The_Ida]

There is no work of art on earth more beautiful than a woman's body. There is nothing "sleazy" about it. If you are offended by simple nudity - a woman crossing her arms - then perhaps you should consider becoming an orthodox Mormon and wearing head-to-toe body suit every day.

I'm not offended by some topless girl, as I stated p*rn makes me feel uneasy though - Eniko's eds have never made me feel that way

 

[elsaskywalker]

Love that new cover, being a fan of close up i won't be disappointed by any pics of eniko!

 

[ParadEyes]

even if we were to say that Terry's eds are to be considered as "art", what's artistic about them?
would it still be art if it featured some voluptuous playboy-esque model? lol seriously I wonder how her eds be perceived if they featured some amatuer unknown model instead of Eniko

 

[ParadEyes]

There is no work of art on earth more beautiful than a woman's body. There is nothing "sleazy" about it. If you are offended by simple nudity - a woman crossing her arms - then perhaps you should consider becoming an orthodox Mormon and wearing head-to-toe body suit every day.

no one is complaining about the cross-arms picture
and it's interesting to see how you state your opinion as if it was a solid fact. atleast a head-to-toe covered woman can still have an "open" mind....