I'll argue that it's directly inspired by the set for Chanel AW00.With Kim not showing at Couture, do you think this would be his last show?
The set I am getting a major Karl vibe, very Chanel circa 2005-2006
I'll argue that it's directly inspired by the set for Chanel AW00.
The white, the silver grid-work, even the slight lip on the box. I wouldn't be suprised if there's a reveal during the finale.
How was the casting terrible? We've just seen 50 shows in NYFW and LFW with second and third tier models and this is objectively the first return to the higher standard of top 30ish girls. No novelty supermodel involvement ( that is kind of a cheap contrivance sometimes), but as far as girls on the zeitgeist and a generally good diversification of new and established, I think it was very good.A slow-paced boring show of boring clothes with a terrible casting…
Such a waste of ressources.
And this time, even Silvia’s accessories couldn’t save it.
I was rooting for Fabio Z to take over Fendi but in reality, we need a swap: Daniel Lee and Silvia Venturini Fendi as designers for menswear and womenswear; Kim Jones as CD of Burberry. In the meantime, out of Dior!
No wonder that Celine and Loewe are outselling them…
It was terrible because the girls looked terrible. They didn’t looked good and didn’t made the clothes look good. And the clothes weren’t good.How was the casting terrible? We've just seen 50 shows in NYFW and LFW with second and third tier models and this is objectively the first return to the higher standard of top 30ish girls. No novelty supermodel involvement ( that is kind of a cheap contrivance sometimes), but as far as girls on the zeitgeist and a generally good balance, I think it was very good.
Yeah that could be true, but has nothing to do with the casting. Like you said in your comment - 'you can have the best girls in the world'. You're effectively saying yourself that your observation has nothing to do with the cast. When we armchair critique the casting all we can refer to is the girls in the show, not the tools they have to perform. If you separate the show into different metrics - clothes, set, music, cast, lighting etc. We are speaking of those things on their own merit.It was terrible because the girls looked terrible. They didn’t looked good and didn’t made the clothes look good. And the clothes weren’t good.
This is the proof that you can have the best girls in the world but if you don’t put them in the best light, it’s terrible.
Maybe my comment implies that the girls were the problem but they aren’t. The problem is Kim Jones, his clothes, his presentation. The girls are just collateral damage.Yeah that could be true, but has nothing to do with the casting. Like you said in your comment - 'you can have the best girls in the world'. You're effectively saying yourself that your observation has nothing to do with the cast. When we armchair critique the casting all we can refer to is the girls in the show, not the tools they have to perform. If you separate the show into different metrics - clothes, set, music, cast, lighting etc. We are speaking of those things on their own merit.
Funny you say that as I was thinking that Daniel Lee would be a great fit at Fendi. His collections are Burberry do have this feeling of eccentricity that reminds of Karl's later collections. I wouldn't be mad at that at all.I was rooting for Fabio Z to take over Fendi but in reality, we need a swap: Daniel Lee and Silvia Venturini Fendi as designers for menswear and womenswear; Kim Jones as CD of Burberry. In the meantime, out of Dior!
No wonder that Celine and Loewe are outselling them…