Street Looks
RJ: You’ve seen all these blogs about style on the street, like the Sartorialist, who works with Style.com, or Facehunter. Do you like them?
FS: It’s good, fun, also so as not to always see the same faces…
BG: Also because fashion can sometimes work vertically, from bottom to top, coming from the street. Even the emerging English designers. There are so many different ways of dressing in those areas of London in which they live that the designer starts doing things in that same way and becomes the avant-garde of London. And then, a year later, everyone in the world is doing it…
RJ:I love to see how people dress differently from one city to another; you can often guess where they are from…
FS: Each person plays the part they live. If you live in Manhattan, downtown is different from uptown. If you live in Milan, you automatically have a more bourgeois mentality than people from somewhere else, because you are less stimulated.
BG: But it is a type of culture and mind-frame. I always see it in London, living in the east for a while now, I realize that my internal structure is much more bourgeois even though I’ve been in London for 5 years… before I was in NY for 4…
FS: I think you have to use everything you have and then “buzzzzz” put it in the blender and pull out something new. And then, the thing that I find wrong is coherence. We shouldn’t be coherent. We should continue to challenge ourselves. Every day I come here, I challenge myself. I change the sequencing of the magazine just as we are going to press…
BG: I imagine it drives everyone crazy…
FS: I change the cover, I change things, I change the photos… that’s what makes it fresh
RJ: And where accidents happen, this is where you find the magic.
FS: Sometimes they really are accidents…
RJ: I love accidents since they are the only things that push evolution. Like the inventions.
BG:When the accidents come from the right input, they usually create something exceptional, magical.
Internet Revolution
RJ: How do you see this new revolution on the internet?
FS: Fundamentally, we can’t live without it. But, I think that we can’t assume that it’s the only direction we will go in because it’s like thinking that one day we’ll all just wear plastic bags because they’re cheaper. That’s not ok. The smell of paper, to be able to hold the object, to be able to look at things again… because the beauty of the internet is it’s speed, but the drawback is that it leaves you with no memory.
BG: Yes, you can save the site but it’s not the same as taking another look at the page. I keep the copies. Books, too…
FS: You need the history. A good book will always give you a nice feeling. It’s good because going too fast… it’s like living in NY and saying that you would like to only live in Florence. You can’t put down Florence or Venice because in any case they have history, but it’s great to go to NY to energize. I think there needs to be synergies. Internet needs to set the tone for the magazines that are more subdued, and the magazines need to give an image for those who don’t look at the internet.
RJ: Of course. How do you see these communities, like Myspace for example? What they’ve done with music and what we would like to do with fashion: opening new channels of communication and giving more freedom to people in order to express themselves.
FS: Fantastic. Because you find everything. You come into contact with people that you wouldn’t normally.
RJ: Designers find feedback… for example, Lutz told me how he thought it was great to know what other people thought of his collection. Because he had never heard it before, because people will tell you face to face, but to be polite, they’re nice. But a person that doesn’t know you sees things intuitively…
IQONS
BG: In fact, we made the Catwalk Rating, where you can decide which designer’s collection you want to see and vote on each look. Or you can click on random to see a selection of looks and leave a comment that can be seen...
RJ:You rate catwalk looks on a scale from 1 to 10, where each scale also contains a written description, such as: “not for me”, “I like”, “ I love” and “I adore”. We chose to apply these generic categories to the look rather than to the designer or the collection. We wanted to avoid too much controversy since reviewing a collection or the work of a designer, as a whole, requires a deeper knowledge and understanding. I wanted this feature to be fun and to encourage people to share their opinions. It’s meant to be sticky, catchy and fun. I thought we would have to monitor the comments but we didn’t need to. In general, most comments people leave are interesting and very pertinent.
FS: Because the fact remains that you may like the comments but you don’t know who reads them…
RJ: In any case, as a platform, IQONS has no editorial content, except for that which we are doing in a very spontaneous way because we are not opinion leaders but purely a platform.
FS: Sometimes, when I have time – which isn’t often – I sit down and take a look at the comments because, actually, it does bring out a lot of things.
RJ: It’s like a fashion study of whatever happens. Everyone can vote. Then you need to be a member in order to leave a comment, which allows us to make the distinction between who has a little more fashion-culture and the comments of people we don’t know.
.
FS: That’s great, I like it a lot!
BG: Who got the most votes, Dior? Margiela?
RJ: Dior, Balenciaga… the comments on Balenciaga are great, full of wit… It would be interesting to compare what IQONS people say next to what the world press says…
BG: I was expecting more comments on Margiela, because everyone loved it…
RJ: Margiela is one of the most-loved within our community. He is also one of my favorites…
BG: He’s always been a favorite of mine as well; the concept of the house is highly respected…
FS: Margiela is really something else…
The Future
RJ: And for the future?
FS: It’s all open. For me the future is already tomorrow morning. It’s not like in the past when someone would make plans. You would say, now I’m going to get organized and in a year, I’ll do it… The beauty of the work that I like doing is that I can change everything tomorrow morning. I receive lots of support, from the right publishing house, though. Because when I decide that I want to do something, they support me, but I am also supported by the strength of our sales, which means we sell pages.
BG: Of course, there is the support and appreciation of the public… actually, that’s what you need, I think it is one of the reasons for which – I have to say it – I don’t buy other magazines, but as soon as I arrive in Italy, I run out and get it!
RJ: There is an artistic quality to Vogue Italia that I, personally, don’t find in other magazines…
FS: We try every time! But, it’s not that every time you get what you want…
RJ: To conclude, do you have any internet projects?
FS: We already have a site: Style.it. and I would like to make an intelligent site for men. There’s already Style… You see, I don’t want to use the word “fashion” with men. I like men’s “style” because there are so many different kinds of men, much more than women. Because women go more or less by category: chic, BCBG, conceptual, minimal, sl*tty… With men, each one is unique. It is rare that two men talk about clothing and want to dress the same way.
RJ: You are right, the styles are very different. Thank you so much, your perspectives and ideas have been so interesting!
[iqons, http://www.iqons.com/iqons.php?fct=page&i=44]