Gucci S/S 2025 Milan

This is beyond dusty looking. Like an old d&g listing thats been sitting for years on eBay or poshmark for $75.

The wedge mules are nice. God bless the rest which looks made for outlet, soon to be there anyways
The wedge mules are nice..because its 3 prada vintage styles of wedge mules mixed into one...typical milan fashion (gays) obsessed with vintage prada and miu miu as starting point to each collection ...they cant see beyond it
 
The wedge mules are nice..because its 3 prada vintage styles of wedge mules mixed into one...typical milan fashion (gays) obsessed with vintage prada and miu miu as starting point to each collection ...they cant see beyond it
Funny enough he worked at Prada before moving to Valentino.
 
Wearing that stuff is like a self pwning walk of shame. Walking thru the streets like the scarlet letter but instead of the letter A it's a tag that says "zero self-worth" spelled out on your collar... Thankfully Jesus loves all people and we can be forgiven with the atoning blood of Christ.
But only if his blood is Ancora red...
 
If you look at Gucci SS2006, it was just clothes too…
Context is important in fashion and the vision of looking forward as well as the positioning of a house is important.

Today, it’s a bit easy to put everything at the same level because HF can be seen as luxury but back then, there was a kind of clear distinction in terms of audience, price point, expectation and products.

The person going to Jil Sander, no matter the era, is going for the clothes and the promise of those clothes (Jil Sander is about clothes for an active/professional life). I don’t think clothes was ever the first promise from Gucci.
I guess, that is what I am wondering with the Anocra stuff. Gucci was, to me, was always more of a lifestyle than really about the clothes, as you so elegantly put, and in this vein, his stuff ist presented and marketed (or so I understand) as "beautiful clothes" or "desirable product" but to my question is - to whom? Where is she going?

As you said, 20 years ago, there was a clear person these brands were talking to, the Jil Sander Woman, the Helmut Lang woman, the Margiela Woman, the Gucci woman - they were not all showing up at the same event. I'd argue even the merchandise crazy Alessandro-era was talking to a few specific groups of people, even though they were not the ones who are buying the clothes, similar to Hedi at Saint Laurent. But this? This, to me, is just "stuff" - the opposite of luxury, whether that be timeless or trend-driven.
 
He was an assistant pattern maker, his first job.
Didn't work in any style (design) office, team there.
This is a man without talent, since he gained nothing from it. Nicolas Ghesquière started his career by making coffee for Agnes B at the age of 15 and gained more from it than all of them, who theoretically started in very good places.
 
Wearing that stuff is like a self pwning walk of shame. Walking thru the streets like the scarlet letter but instead of the letter A it's a tag that says "zero self-worth" spelled out on your collar... Thankfully Jesus loves all people and we can be forgiven with the atoning blood of Christ.
Your avatar in Christmas edition:rofl::crush:
 
I know it's the whole point of the clothes, but the labelling on everything looks f*cking crazy.

Logomania has a very specific purpose: when creativity is close to zero, the logo makes it possible to distinguish a Fendi, Dior, Gucci or Zara garment from one another.
Without logo, they look all the same.

Ditto for the bags: what you are paying for is the golden clasp on the front flap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,618
Messages
15,191,345
Members
86,525
Latest member
cspivey
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->