- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Messages
- 4,896
- Reaction score
- 3
onehotgrrl, i know u posted that last ad in good spirits, but homosexuality is not the same as tranvestism, transgenderism or transexualism 

Apparel and jewelry advertising in gay print media increased at more than twice the rate of ads placed in gay publications overall in 2004, climbing 39.2 percent to reach 618 pages, up from 444 pages in 2003. That’s according to the “2004 Gay Press Report,” published by gay media placement firm Rivendell Marketing and Prime Access, a multicultural ad agency.
By comparison, the number of ad pages placed in gay publications last year advanced 17.5 percent, totaling 39,561, versus 33,681 ad pages in 2003.
The growing number of locales sanctioning gay civil unions and the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts spurred much of the growth in fashion advertising in gay magazines and newspapers, said Todd Evans, Rivendell’s president and chief executive officer. Apparel ads accounted for 369, or 60 percent, of the 618 fashion placements tracked in the April 2004 editions of 139 gay titles, while 249 jewelry ads made up the difference.
The fashion category’s ad increase marked the ninth-largest percentage gain among 16 sectors with double-digit increases in ads in gay titles in 2004, a group led by health, fitness and grooming ads, which tallied 3,179, up 87.2 percent from 1,698 in 2003. Asked to assess the timing of fashion advertising placed in gay titles — once heavily skewed to gay pride month, in June editions, and holiday, in December issues — Evans said: “Fashion ads have become pretty consistent year-round, which has contributed to the increase. April is a very average month.”
toohipforbrooklyn said:onehotgrrl, i know u posted that last ad in good spirits, but homosexuality is not the same as tranvestism, transgenderism or transexualism![]()
MODELMADMAN said:i wish this thread were devoted to gays in ads -- women together do not have the same impact, except on straight men![]()
![]()
MODELMADMAN said:i wish this thread were devoted to gays in ads -- women together do not have the same impact, except on straight men![]()
![]()
*AndoraStar* said:I'm sorry but that IS UNTRUE!
There is NO WAY that we at tfs would get rid of the girl on girl ads!
This site is about FASHION not soley homosexuality.
. Come on people, we are the fashion elite (as Stefan o Pilati has it) so let's stop acting like unenlightened morons and realise that sexuality and gender are powerful things worth understanding.jssy4eva said:i don't think that they are try in to say bi-sexual...so much as they are tryin to say that the gucci woman is kind of a sl*t![]()
Edina Monsoon said:To be frank though, the most 'shocking' thing about this thread has been the responses! Tokyo_Vogue wrote that "Tom Ford loves manass" and jssy4eva said .
Come on people, we are the fashion elite (as Stefan o Pilati has it) so let's stop acting like unenlightened morons and realise that sexuality and gender are powerful things worth understanding.jssy4eva said:i don't think that they are try in to say bi-sexual...so much as they are tryin to say that the gucci woman is kind of a sl*t![]()
the point of this forum is not titillation...MODELMADMAN said:i wish this thread were devoted to gays in ads -- women together do not have the same impact, except on straight men![]()
![]()
kimair said:and more gucci, natasa v. and erin wasson