candlebougie
An die Freude.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
- Messages
- 2,221
- Reaction score
- 0
Nadja in court today (charged with evasion of taxes)
bild.de
bild.de
OhSoSugarless
Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 896
- Reaction score
- 0
She just had a baby...
versustito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Messages
- 11,014
- Reaction score
- 776
versustito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Messages
- 11,014
- Reaction score
- 776
blueorchid
you soft and only
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 11,960
- Reaction score
- 11,746
W Magazine April 1995
Model: Nadja Auermann
Photographer: Craig McDean
W Magazine July 1995
Model: Nadja Auermann
Photographer: Miles Aldridge
dnamodels
Model: Nadja Auermann
Photographer: Craig McDean
W Magazine July 1995
Model: Nadja Auermann
Photographer: Miles Aldridge
dnamodels
versustito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Messages
- 11,014
- Reaction score
- 776
versustito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Messages
- 11,014
- Reaction score
- 776
Tax
Investment in the trial of Nadja Auermann
13.09.2011
When buying a home in Berlin points to the former model Nadja Auermann have misled the state about 270 000 €. But if you really have evaded taxes is questionable: A tax auditor admitted that his notes were "purely hypothetical
At the trial of ex-model Nadja Auermann for tax evasion on Monday, a tax expert has been consulted. The former official had worked casually for a foreign company that had handled the purchase of the villa became Auermann Berlin. Before the Amtsgericht Tiergarten admitted the man, in his assessment of whether taxes apply, would be "exaggerated." In the course since May that the method refers to whether the former top model resident in Germany 1999-2002 had and therefore was not taxable there. Prosecutors based their suspicions with the purchase of Köpenicker villa. It comes from a tax loss of about € 272 000.
Villa was an "investment" does not, the residence
Instead Auermann had declared in court, the house was mostly an "investment". The two companies on behalf of the property you bought at the time, she describes the process as "bad advice". They have relied on their lawyers and tax advisers said. Co-defendant in the lawsuit is Auer ex-husband, actor Wolfram Grandezka. The tax specialists are reportedly due to previous problems with the tax authorities in Berlin a foothold to build an independent consultant and therefore exaggerated the experience to help the foreign company "must be."
Ominously memorandum
For his analysis he had received only a fraction of the documents from his client. His instructions were therefore, "purely hypothetical" have been and should represent only, as was the tax law in Germany. The note by the person skilled in the experience of "cleaning events" was, according to counsel crucial for initiating the control method against Auermann Auer. The witness said he meant simply that the need for information to the tax office "ordinary" and "consistent" be.
(translate.googe)
focus.de
Investment in the trial of Nadja Auermann
13.09.2011
When buying a home in Berlin points to the former model Nadja Auermann have misled the state about 270 000 €. But if you really have evaded taxes is questionable: A tax auditor admitted that his notes were "purely hypothetical
At the trial of ex-model Nadja Auermann for tax evasion on Monday, a tax expert has been consulted. The former official had worked casually for a foreign company that had handled the purchase of the villa became Auermann Berlin. Before the Amtsgericht Tiergarten admitted the man, in his assessment of whether taxes apply, would be "exaggerated." In the course since May that the method refers to whether the former top model resident in Germany 1999-2002 had and therefore was not taxable there. Prosecutors based their suspicions with the purchase of Köpenicker villa. It comes from a tax loss of about € 272 000.
Villa was an "investment" does not, the residence
Instead Auermann had declared in court, the house was mostly an "investment". The two companies on behalf of the property you bought at the time, she describes the process as "bad advice". They have relied on their lawyers and tax advisers said. Co-defendant in the lawsuit is Auer ex-husband, actor Wolfram Grandezka. The tax specialists are reportedly due to previous problems with the tax authorities in Berlin a foothold to build an independent consultant and therefore exaggerated the experience to help the foreign company "must be."
Ominously memorandum
For his analysis he had received only a fraction of the documents from his client. His instructions were therefore, "purely hypothetical" have been and should represent only, as was the tax law in Germany. The note by the person skilled in the experience of "cleaning events" was, according to counsel crucial for initiating the control method against Auermann Auer. The witness said he meant simply that the need for information to the tax office "ordinary" and "consistent" be.
(translate.googe)
focus.de
Similar Threads
