Natasha Poly

[afterrhours]

the bangs are such a nice touch in VP ed!

 

[tarsha]

US VOGUE FEBRUARY 2011

Beauty
Natasha Poly



myfdb

 

[CharmingNicky]

She doesnt look like herself in that pic

 

[vogue28]

Unfortunately that shot is not new. It's by Craig McDean for the April 2010 issue of US Vogue. I don't recall seeing that particular photo in the issue. But there was 4 photos, very Gucci Cruise 2005, that accompanied a shorts article.

 

[LiranYana]

oh my, US Vogue Beauty Ed
is that shot new ?

but why Blonde ?
I hope those rumors she went back Blonde is not true

 

[Chanelcouture09]

if you had of read the above post by vogue28, you would of noticed he had identified it as it being from US Vogue April 2010.

 

[diorelle]

Werqq tha wind in the hurr luk~ That would have made a great editorial too bad Anna cut it down to like 3 pictures. Oh well w/e I love seeing her in US Vogue.

 

[zacatecas570]

^I think Anna repented and give her a second chance because she looks great
Even tho that's an old pic, I'm glad she's back in US Vogue

 

[alonsoJonathan]

DEF. that pic shouldnt have been wasted.to me she looks perfect!

 

[Vladita]

Maybe she told them to give her the Abbey Lee look... B)

I noticed that too.

 

[AuRevoirSavannah]

oh my, US Vogue Beauty Ed
is that shot new ?

but why Blonde ?
I hope those rumors she went back Blonde is not true

She's blonde again?? Nooo. She looks so much better brunette.

 

[zacatecas570]

oh my, US Vogue Beauty Ed
is that shot new ?

but why Blonde ?
I hope those rumors she went back Blonde is not true

Who start the rummor and when???
Well at least in this thread NEVER!

 

[LiranYana]

Who start the rummor and when???
Well at least in this thread NEVER!

wasn't there someone that said a few pages back
the brunette hair was just part of the Givenchy exclusive
and lighter shades appeared since Chanel

but I think its impossible to just go blonde all of a sudden
considering it will make a mark if it changes, hoping that's not true,
because Im anticipating the new look
and no to mention its only a few days until couture

 

[HappyChanel]

Uhh, didn't someone already say that the picture in US Vogue Feb Beauty Ed was old? It seems kind of strange that the people in this thread simply ignored it and came up with their own conclusions that she dyed it back all the sudden.

 

[mousyy]

This thread is sick. I don't really want to unsubscribe.

 

[Teja]

This thread is sick. I don't really want to unsubscribe.

My thoughts exactly.

 

[dicky.89]

I think the eagerness to see new things and their evolution after the hair change have evoked a myriad of small discussions, questions and anxiety, do not really like that you are not stop spinning because I like her as a model and when I come to see the news item does not expect to see more discussion the truth is that tired.

 

[alonsoJonathan]

is just some member who try to make big deals about things that r no worth it!!
anyways i love natasha and i will keep suscribe!

 

[CharmingNicky]

oh my, US Vogue Beauty Ed
is that shot new ?

but why Blonde ?
I hope those rumors she went back Blonde is not true

What rumours? You're the only person saying this so wouldnt call it 'rumours'

 

[alonsoJonathan]

^think the same