lakomka said:Sorry if reposts
Where are these pix from? I'm referring to post 1031.
I just don't want her to become OVER-commercialized. I also agree with a couple of the previous posters, she just doesn't seem to be VS material, in my opinion. I don't know... I guess I just don't think she has a "lingerie" model body. Don't get me wrong, her body is absolutely gorgeous, but for VS, I don't know. 
Amelia said:Sorry, I know that it's a repost but I like her on this Vogue cover from January 2005:
![]()
I'm glad you agree with me!Sweet rus said:no...I dont like Natasha for VS and I absolutely agree with tortoisie
Spasibo, sladkii rus! 
GretchenL, I agree with you! I don't want Nati to be over-commercialized.GretchenL said:Natasha for VS?I just don't want her to become OVER-commercialized. I also agree with a couple of the previous posters, she just doesn't seem to be VS material, in my opinion. I don't know... I guess I just don't think she has a "lingerie" model body. Don't get me wrong, her body is absolutely gorgeous, but for VS, I don't know.
![]()
miss_dior_cheri said:I love that cover too... I can't describe her beauty in words anymore... She keeps blowing me away...
. Everytime. Everywhere,...Amelia said:These colors... She lives for 'Vogue'. She's one of these models which look great on the 'Vogue' covers. Everytime. Everywhere,...
