Oscar de la Renta F/W 2023.24 New York

LadyJunon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Messages
4,454
Reaction score
9,913

I'll try to post the lookbook as soon as I can find it.
 
For those who are wondering why they haven't returned to the runway, they didn't have the financial resources to continue doing runway shows after the pandemic. Now, the executives are deciding to focus on pushing commercial offerings instead of runway collections to strengthen their profits.

Here's the article in question:
Oscar de la Renta is stepping away from fashion week as it prioritises profits over market share
The New York-based luxury brand is done ‘keeping up with the Joneses’.

by Lauren Indvik
24 Dec 2022 05:09AM

Almost three years after the pandemic began, legendary American fashion house Oscar de la Renta has still not made a return to New York Fashion Week. One show was streamed on a more humble platform — Amazon.com.

“Is Amazon exactly the right venue for luxury fashion? I’m not sure,” chief executive Alex Bolen says in a video interview from the brand’s headquarters in midtown Manhattan. “But we have to experiment with new ways to get our story out.”

That shift is emblematic of the challenges and scaled-back ambitions facing many small and medium-sized fashion and luxury names that have been unable to come back from the pandemic as forcefully as sector leaders such as LVMH and Kering.

For Oscar de la Renta, the pandemic was a test of survival. “There were days when I thought we are just not going to make it,” Bolen recalls.

He says 2019 had been a good year for the company: “We’d grown, we were profitable and, importantly, we opened late in the year our first store in Paris” — which Bolen hoped would draw in Chinese tourists. Pre-orders for the pre-fall collection creative directors Laura Kim and Fernando Garcia had shown to buyers in December had been robust. “Fast forward 60 or 90 days, and suddenly everything started to come apart,” Bolen says.

Just as fabric for the pre-fall collection arrived, department stores shut and cancelled their orders. Factory closures meant fabric could be neither cut nor sewn. “Between lost business and owing money to vendors and landlords, I estimated we had about a US$25 million (S$33.8 million) hole in the balance sheet,” Bolen says. By the end of March, all but 27 of Oscar’s 300 staff had been put on furlough. “We decided not to pay our landlords and delayed payments to our vendors and had fights with everybody,” says Bolen. “We had to focus on the durability of the business.”

The company pulled through thanks to a US$15 million loan and government support but laid off about 50 employees. The US$4,000 cocktail dresses and US$6,000 evening gowns that are the brand’s bread and butter were offloaded to outlets and sold for “20, 25 cents on the dollar”, Bolen says. “It was awful.”

He says the company has no intention of returning to New York Fashion Week. Instead, it plans to experiment with off-season shows like the one it hosted with Saks Fifth Avenue last August to raise funds for the League to Save Lake Tahoe. In addition to tickets, it generated half a million dollars in clothing sales. These shows — to be held in LA, Palm Beach and the Dominican Republic next year — will be focused not on department store buyers and press — “I don’t think the fashion press at a fashion show is particularly relevant [to us any more],” Bolen says — but on clients.

“Our industry has a problem with keeping up with the Joneses,” he continues, citing Dior’s recent show in Egypt and Saint Laurent’s spring/summer 2023 show across from the Eiffel Tower in September. “I have no business spending that kind of money on a fashion show to sell clothes.”

Bolen’s views on shows parallel his broader views on the business: he is less focused on competing for market share with Europe’s big luxury brands than on running a resilient, profitable business. After falling 65 per cent in 2020, he says sales are on track to reach US$120 million this year — “nicely above” 2019 levels. More importantly to Bolen, profit margins have grown from “about 10 per cent” to nearly 25 per cent.

First-time customers tend to come to Oscar de la Renta for bridal, and then start to buy into the rest of the range. “The idea of us chasing after competitor brands that have leather goods businesses or beauty businesses or both, it’s just been a mistake,” he says. “We want to go a different way.”

The designer Oscar de la Renta was born in Santo Domingo, in the Dominican Republic, in 1932. A student of art, he learnt to drape and sew at Cristóbal Balenciaga’s salon in Madrid and later at Lanvin under Antonio del Castillo in Paris before opening his own house in 1965 in New York. He soon became the de facto designer of Fifth Avenue socialites and White House matriarchs, outfitting nearly every first lady from Jacqueline Kennedy to Michelle Obama (Hillary Clinton was a friend and eulogised the designer at his memorial service). His later success on the red carpet, in particular with Sarah Jessica Parker in her Sex and the City heyday, made him an international star.

Before he died of complications from cancer in 2014, de la Renta wanted to ensure his name and business would not dissipate in the manner of his former rivals Bill Blass and Halston but, like the great fashion houses of Europe, live on.

The task of carrying on both name and business fell to de la Renta’s stepdaughter and executive vice-president of his company, Eliza Bolen, and to her husband Alex Bolen, a Bear Stearns alumnus whom de la Renta made chief executive in 2004. It also fell, for a time, to designer Peter Copping, whom de la Renta had recruited from Nina Ricci to be his successor and who worked alongside de la Renta in the last months of his life. Copping departed only two years later, and the collections have since come under the direction of Kim and Garcia, who worked under de la Renta and have given a more youthful spin to his classic and decidedly feminine DNA without casualising the brand.

When Bolen joined Oscar in 2004, the company was operating in what he previously described to me as “a kind of designer 1990s licensing model, where the high-end runway product was not the driver of the business, but was very much a promotional tool”. While larger rivals such as LVMH, Kering and Michael Kors were aggressively expanding their leather goods offerings, Bolen decided to streamline the licences and make high-end women’s ready-to-wear the core of the business.

Whether that was the right move is debatable. While leather goods and, in some cases, beauty are now the main profit drivers for luxury companies, few US brands have been able to succeed at the former, which analysts attribute to the lack of long-term investment available to labels in that country.

At the same time, businesses without those profit sources lately find themselves unable to compete on stores and brand awareness campaigns in fast-growing markets such as China. They also lack the resources to deepen relationships with top-spending clients through the carousel of shows, dinners and trips.

The feeling of being unable to compete with the big players has persuaded more than a few family-owned luxury businesses to sell to a conglomerate or private equity firm over the past decade — among them Versace, Missoni and Etro.

Would Bolen consider a sale given, as he says, his sons are not interested in succeeding him? “We get some calls from time to time,” he replies. “In the depths of COVID, I was thinking, wouldn’t it be nice to be part of a big conglomerate? . . . But there’s a lot that we can do on our own.”
Source: CNA Luxury
 
Hoping they'll be able to reach a stable financial status soon and hire back all the staff they lost during covid, de la renta is very important for a healthy and dynamic new york fashion scene. However, I'm not blown away by this video presentation, looks like somewhere between gossip girl and a bad netflix sitcom trailer and does not do justice to the clothing. Just the lookbook with a nice artistic direction should be enough.
 
Im confused on the collection despite the financial problems…
You would expect a more pragmatic, timeless offering.

Why style a cocktail dress with a baseball cap when you can just design a cute dress in one solid fabric and have it styled in a realistic way? Nobody goes for ODLR for coats so maybe the collection should have been about 10/15 looks with mostly cocktail and daytime dresses.

When I see what PPP is doing for the resort/prefall collections of Valentino, I think it’s a formula that can work.

Sometimes a beautiful shirt dress can do the job of a gown…

There are some cute pieces but I don’t feel like the video is aspirational enough for somebody buying the brand. Chanel can do a video on the subway, everybody knows that Chanel is expensive and luxurious anyway..

When you have financial problems and you are trying to sell 4000$ dress, you need more fantasy, no reality.
 
there are some beautiful dresses… no to those caps obviously and it was a little too pedestrian. I don’t associate the ODLR woman to such environment unless they’re targeting another (younger) clientele. and still…
 
Knew the video was going to annoy me because the collar of the lilac coat on Ugbad was left buckled on one side. Smooth that down ffs.

The dresses are nice, but they're not really sellable in the grander scheme of things. Don't think they know how to approach this situation and still be ODLR enough.
 
i-7JjC4cZ-X4.jpg
i-X7rWBv8-X4.jpg
i-Z8XCGjq-X4.jpg
i-Q4HHK2s-X4.jpg
i-vN82H3x-X4.jpg
i-9CnmsCw-X4.jpg
i-mtf6D8L-X4.jpg
i-8w9BTZm-X4.jpg
i-kZqh53x-X4.jpg
i-C56QHNL-X4.jpg
i-kSmJCfC-X4.jpg
i-PHwGpPf-X4.jpg
i-S2BcDct-X4.jpg
i-PpTztLk-X4.jpg
i-zFVD5GB-X4.jpg
i-TF9kZqV-X4.jpg
i-kkK842p-X4.jpg
i-FGQbDs8-X4.jpg
i-r4BfztS-X4.jpg
i-wXtgc63-X4.jpg
i-kqfJCtp-X4.jpg
i-WbXk973-X4.jpg
i-qptTkXD-X4.jpg
i-2w7b7hS-X4.jpg
i-tVg3T78-X4.jpg

Source: Oscar de la Renta
 
46 looks, excluding all the accessory shots that I intentionally left out. This collection should've been 20-25 looks maximum, especially when the CEO is claiming the the brand is struggling financially.

The other thing I noticed is that the proposition is trying so hard to appear as young and trendy, but it doesnt seem remotely modern at all. Who is this for?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder why all of a sudden the company is struggling financially?
 
I wonder why all of a sudden the company is struggling financially?
Long story short, 2019 was their first "positive year" since Oscar's death and they were hoping to start focusing on growth the following year. The virus hit, orders were cancelled, factories and supplies closed and the brand lost $25M. They ended up taking a $15M loan and firing 50 of their formerly 300 employees.

Because it's insanely difficult to sell eveningwear during a pandemic, they ended up selling their old stock to outlets who resold them at very heavy discounts. Back in the 90s, the bulk of OdlR's profits came from licensing, but when Bolen became CEO back in the 00s, he streamlined the business to high-end ready-to-wear. That and the bridal business is OdlR's bottom line. Their other divisions (accessories, jewellery) are very primitive in their operations.

There's a good chance of Bolen selling OdlR to a luxury group after his retirement as none of his children are interested in taking it over.
 
Long story short, 2019 was their first "positive year" since Oscar's death and they were hoping to start focusing on growth the following year. The virus hit, orders were cancelled, factories and supplies closed and the brand lost $25M. They ended up taking a $15M loan and firing 50 of their formerly 300 employees.

Because it's insanely difficult to sell eveningwear during a pandemic, they ended up selling their old stock to outlets who resold them at very heavy discounts. Back in the 90s, the bulk of OdlR's profits came from licensing, but when Bolen became CEO back in the 00s, he streamlined the business to high-end ready-to-wear. That and the bridal business is OdlR's bottom line. Their other divisions (accessories, jewellery) are very primitive in their operations.

There's a good chance of Bolen selling OdlR to a luxury group after his retirement as none of his children are interested in taking it over.

Thank you for explaining this to me. It sounds like it’s best for it to be at a luxury group.
 
Looks like America’s Next Too Model, the Wisconsin edition.
 
They are financially struggling and still churning out a long unedited collection like this. Oscar would never. It's all over the place and it lacks focus.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,851
Messages
15,240,228
Members
87,776
Latest member
Ella1987
Back
Top