Project Alabama ..are back (updated)

Scott said:
I saw alot of pieces at Louis,Boston last year and as I said,the thing that really put me off their work was the lack of actual design in terms of construction and shape thereby putting these hefty price tags on the pieces. That's why I say they charged mainly for the topstitching. To me,it looked too generic;like stitched up Banana Republic clothes.

Some of it may have been; in the beginning they worked with vintage fabrics.

It's true they were charging for the hand-work ... not just stitching though, there was applique, reverse applique, etc.

My impression was that it was different from anything else on the market, a positive as well as a negative ... the negative being that if you're building a wardrobe in a thoughtful way, things need to relate to each other. Even their colors had nada/little to do with what was going on in the rest of the industry ...
 
so, now, they are back just as they should

A Second Time Around for Project AlabamaPublished: Thursday, April 26, 2007
By Julee Greenberg

Project Alabama, the young designer brand known for its intricate handmade designs, is back in business less than a year after closing.

The label, which shut last September after six years, has resurfaced with secured financial backing and a new production process.

Project Alabama previously relied on a network of sewers in its home state to produce pieces. This became costly and eventually drove the brand out of business. Now it is relaunching for fall under the design direction of Shannon Schmalfeldt, who has been with the company since its inception and worked alongside founding designer Natalie Chanin, who is no longer involved with Project Alabama. Enrico Marone Cinzanno, co-founder of the firm with Chanin, is still with the company as an investor, along with a new backer, C.G. USA, a New York-based investment firm that backs several fashion-related businesses.

Susan Correa, brand director for Project Alabama, was determined to revive the label, which she joined as a sourcing specialist about six months before the shutdown, and stayed to relaunch the business. Correa continues to head Electric Avenue, a sourcing firm she founded that also works with such brands as Vera Wang, Lela Rose and Yigal Azrouël.

"I first saw the product in Barneys and fell in love with it," she said. "But I was really intrigued at how they did their production, if each piece really was handmade in the U.S. It honestly seemed impossible to me that they were in business."

After meeting with Chanin and Cinzanno, Correa began looking for a factory in India to handle intricate work as Project Alabama became known for its fine cotton fabrics, beading and expert tailoring. Correa said she knew she had to find a "soul mate" for the brand. She eventually found a factory in India that became just as intrigued with the product, and now the Project Alabama collection is being made the same way as it always was — only with Indian manufacturing.

"We are using all of the same American-made fabrics, and all of the design is still done in Alabama, where Shannon is based," Correa said. "What we did was set up the same exact system in India as we used to have in Alabama. But since it is now in India, we are able to keep the costs down, which in turn allows us to offer the product to a new set of consumers."

from wwd.com
 
^HAHA! :lol:

i still don't get how anybody would and could base themselves in alabama...
 
:D project outsource to india sounds so totally on the point here

at least their work will be much more affordable this time around
 
hmmm.. i dont know how i feel about this... on the one hand, its great that they are around, but for me the charm about them was it was created by these local artisans in alabama(i imagine these old women sewing together!) which made the product so special.
 
there were design issues, not just pricing issues. The last thing I saw in stores was a mangled up t-shirt with metallic glitter all over it and what looked like acid markers. It was over $1,000. So if it's $500 now what's the difference?
 
nice- very nice...
so i guess the fact that all the quilters who built the business are now completely shut out is irrelevant to the company...

how awful...
i say BOYCOTT!!!...
not like i ever would have bought it anyway...:lol:...

thanks for the news lena....really surprising to me...
 
i think its awful too. these investors are bonkers to think they can actually make a profit with this stuff this time around even if this stuff is outsourced.

and just because its made in india doesnt mean that the garments will cost any less.
 
well, all of this goes to show how much business people take the consumer for a bunch of idiots.
If the concept that founded the brand, was about keeping artisans in Alabama working, and to offer a product that was handmade in the US,
isnt this concept and the original goal, lost by making the product in India?
 
Project India! Ahahahahahahah! That really doesn't make any sense. Whatsoever.
 
zamb said:
well, all of this goes to show how much business people take the consumer for a bunch of idiots.
If the concept that founded the brand, was about keeping artisans in Alabama working, and to offer a product that was handmade in the US,
isnt this concept and the original goal, lost by making the product in India?

You're right, zam, it's really insulting ...
 
:angry: Tell me this isn't yet another example of exploitation. Perhaps they should call their line "Mark Up"?
 
I really do hope that fashion (and the whole world, actually) is just in a stage of commercialization. Things like this shouldn't be happening. Especially since they completely changed the objective of the label!
 
yeah I agree with all the comments above. It was about buying an authentic piece of work that was worked on by local artisans and appreciating the unique history of fabric and sewing that comes from that part of America. Otherwise it's just not worth it.
 
Man this really burns me up! There are many companies doing great work right here in the garment district of New YorK! I know its hard but Zamb really hit the nail on the head when he said they should have concentrated on key items and merchandise the line. Now on the backs of all those sewers in Alabama we get Project India!!!!!! Freaking incredible!!!!!!! I swear the business side of fashion suuuuuuucccckkkkssssss!!!!!!! That is total BS!!!!!!! There are so many talanted people here in the states that want to work for less money to do something that has meaning to them and mean something for the country. Project Alabama was important!!!!!!I am actually upset I even read this. Sorry for the rant but I had to get it out once I read this.

No Im not sorry, this is crazy.I bet the sewers in Alabama did not have a house in Tuscany!!!!! Im sure they were paid way below what they should have.And they are willing to do it again I'm sure!!!

Shoot is any body willing to donate time, skill, facilities in leiu of money? There are plenty of designers, patternmakers, salespersons, merchandisers, models, artisans, photographers, and people with money here on TFS!!!
I am the first to say if anybody wants to start a business that is about using local or rural talent, hand made or machine made, I am with them!!!
How about a Project Kentucky, or Project Harlem, Project Projects( ok that last one is a joke)? But you should all get my meaning.

Yes thats idealistic but I believe it can be done. Also there is no reason why they could not have applied for government grants or a whole slew of urban development, improvement, small business, minority owned( meaning women) grants, loans and other benefits to keep this important venture going. It could have worked in Alabama as they originally intended and even grown!!!!
 
^ I agree, Clay ... and I still believe that the problem was *not* their costs but their designs. The clothes simply weren't in step with what was happening in the rest of fashion, so they didn't work with the rest of your wardrobe. It will be interesting to see what audience they have for Project India :ninja:
 
^well i think it was equal parts. there was really quite honestly a lack of design element in their works. i loved all the handwork and surface detail but the actual design element was quite basic. if it weren't for the handwork,one can assume it would have never had the impact it had. and remember for the first few years it was about t'shirt designs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think project alabama was about design and that was fine with me. It was about wearing a hand crafted item and i really love the textile history around those parts (quilting comes to mind) and to wear something that beautifully references that is worth paying for. Just think what those quilts go for :shock: But i agree a lot with what you say clay. It was important as a PROJECT. There was a way to do the funding. ah well.
 
If the tee looks good then I've no problem to part with my $350... as long as I can look GOOD :)
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->