Provocative / Offensive Ads #1 | Page 31 | the Fashion Spot

Provocative / Offensive Ads #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I don't think it's portraying anything negative!
 
I guess that you're right. It's not an ad.

I don't see anything artistic in it. Blackface or painting of the face with cork is a negative image in history. They'll use makeup to over exaggerate the lips (like this one did) and the eyes and the brightly colored clothing is like the "standard" of blackface performers use to wear. Blackface and minstrel shows drew in white audiences then again blacks weren't allowed or couldn't afford to see the shows anyway . White performers and later some were black performers but still dominated with white playing black characters portrayed blacks in stereotypical roles like lazy, unintelligent or clownish, and overly happy.

Thank you for explaining why this could be seen as offensive. Still, it's a long time ago, a lot of people wouldn't associate this with blackface, because they don't even know it exists. That said, I don't think that image is that good or adds anything interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I'm not offended by that pic because here in Holland every child grows up with 'zwarte piet' (black peet). Shimney sweepers who are the helps from Sinterklaas (the Ducht Santa Claus) who have the same make up as in that pic.
 
In America "black face and red lips" represents negative stereotypes and disrespect toward African Americans. That image is very much prevalent today. There aren't too many Americans of Afro decent not know what that image represents. If you truly don't know the impact of that black face image, show it to a group of African Americans from the south. Its a shame they couldn't have done without the paint because it would have been a beautiful ad.

BTW- that black face image might be a woman of Afro decent...and thats even worse. Years ago, some black performers were forced to wear such make-up to entertain Caucasians.
 
some of the things in this thread turn my stomach, and i don't consider myself a prude!
 
"From the editor (added August 24, 2007): We've received a lot of feedback about this photo recently printed in i-D magazine. Many people have been deeply offended by the photograph. We want to make it clear that this photo is not an American Apparel ad. We truly appreciate the opinions of our readers, and we'll attempt to convey your sentiments to I-D magazine."

americanapparel.net
 
I threw up a little in my mouth when I saw the American Apparel ad.
 
I don't know if these were posted before.
Some Benetton ads

benettondia02.jpg

benettondia09.jpg

benettondia10.jpg

benettondia15.jpg


benettondia17.jpg

benettondia19.jpg

elle1996.jpg

benettondia13.jpg


From: http://www.museedelapub.org

503fwur.jpg

http://comppile.tamucc.edu/comppanel_8.htm

benetton2.jpg


http://www.cas.buffalo.edu/classes/dms/berna/mrd/media/syllabus_Advertising.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i adore benetton ads so much,always have.
 
i personally dont see offence in the Benetton ads posted.(but the last one did freak me out...)
actually some are very cute IMO.
 
^^Too bad you didn't take notice of the black child depicting a devil whereas the white child is shown in a angelic way. Benetton usually will "play up" historical labels in their ads. I'll admit, its daring a thought provoking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the first Benneton ad about? The one with the crowd of people?

and what are they trying to advertise with a baby?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
216,289
Messages
15,334,647
Members
89,997
Latest member
sabinelm
Back
Top