cunning001
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm a total occasional lurker here, so I hope this is not some massively hashed over topic not to be brought up here, if I am mistaken, my apologies.
One of the things I really like about S mag' is that it so consistently pushes on the boundary between fashion photography, sexy relatively classy nudie photography, and outright p*rn photography.
Neophyte though I am, my impression is that with the appropriation of styles or cross pollination or whatever you want to call it between those 3 indistinct branches of photog work that there is still a guilty sort of reaction to a lot of pushing of that boundary in the fashion photography audience. I guess this also has a lot to do with the feelings of the model and what's she's prepared and comfortable doing since it's really her livelihood so, tactical business choices might trump personal feelings to some degree.
And I just love looking at really beautiful artfully photographed works that often involve really amazing looking women.
So, many many thanks Finn
One of the things I really like about S mag' is that it so consistently pushes on the boundary between fashion photography, sexy relatively classy nudie photography, and outright p*rn photography.
Neophyte though I am, my impression is that with the appropriation of styles or cross pollination or whatever you want to call it between those 3 indistinct branches of photog work that there is still a guilty sort of reaction to a lot of pushing of that boundary in the fashion photography audience. I guess this also has a lot to do with the feelings of the model and what's she's prepared and comfortable doing since it's really her livelihood so, tactical business choices might trump personal feelings to some degree.
And I just love looking at really beautiful artfully photographed works that often involve really amazing looking women.
So, many many thanks Finn




































love the S magazine coz of you










