I will be fond of his tenure simply because of all the good laugh and roasting material he gave us.
When he was at Gucci I come to the forum 3 times a day.
I will be fond of his tenure simply because of all the good laugh and roasting material he gave us.
Same!When he was at Gucci I come to the forum 3 times a day.
it was both basic and cheap looking .. this gucci is just a different kind of cheap and basic. one is italian other east euro different ..one is mcdonald the other burger king both are junk food chains you should not consumeFor the people still roasting him, have you seen gucci lately without him 🤣
His gucci was basic but was not cheap looking

it was both basic and cheap looking .. this gucci is just a different kind of cheap and basic. one is italian other east euro different ..one is mcdonald the other burger king both are junk food chains you should not consume![]()
AD ITALIA
oh i stand on it and that's exactly what i do i pick apart collections and i agree Hermes , NG , LV Chanel in any era even Prada have cheap made and looking stuff i don't deny i worked for someCome on @PDFSD , it may have been basic, but cheap looking? It's a bit of a stretch if you ask me. Anyway, you could easily apply this criticism to basically any other designer if you start to pick apart their collections. I could pick dozens of pieces from The Row, or Phoebe Philo, or Nicholas Ghesquiere, for example, and present them as being even cheaper looking than whatever Sabato did. It's just a futile exercise and endless comparison game. Even Hermes has cheap and tacky looking items.
I agree with @tourbillions , a lot of Sabato's pieces were quite luxe in feeling, and of course I am talking about the runway pieces, not what was on the website or commercial offering. Sure, there were some duds here and there, but overall his pieces were definitely not cheap looking. The insides were really well-done. The jackets and coats were made with haute couture finishes. Obviously he lifted those things from the Valentino Haute Couture studios, but I was impressed with the way he could bring those couture finishes over to Gucci RTW. The seaming was pretty impeccable too. The leather goods offering is a different story.




unfortunately still looks better than demnas gucci.oh i stand on it and that's exactly what i do i pick apart collections and i agree Hermes , NG , LV Chanel in any era even Prada have cheap made and looking stuff i don't deny i worked for some
i also expressed my distaste for LV products by NG or Hermes ikea design graphics etc
i am sorry but i dont live for bonded stiff leather or neoprene logo sweaters , yes he worked on coats and changed the lining etc both in taste and execution he no pilliati per example.
The guy barely knew some differences in fabrics types this is from his own team , spend hours on where to place the logo or a web and requested zara items to be picked up for research they have good basics etc was the excuse.
your talking about someone that got moved in valentino form collections as they did not perform well yet he was promoted because he was a god boy.
who ever likes or loves this be my guest but i trust my own eyes and ears and hands and brain cells when it comes to fashion and brands , if its quantum physics i would take your word for it. not on ancora boy
View attachment 1440199View attachment 1440200View attachment 1440201
both are bad ..two things can be wrong at the same timeunfortunately still looks better than demnas gucci.