THE  CREATIVE ESTABLISHMENT: STEFANO TONCHI
from 
INDUSTRIE MAGAZINE » Issues  by industriemagazine
The media  hoo-ha that met Stefano Tonchi’s move to W in the latter part of 2010  demonstrated two things: (a) that editors in chief of fashion titles  really do enjoy mainstream celebrity status these days; and (b) that the  combination of the magazine and Tonchi is an irresistibly powerful  package. Which is why, to whispers of ‘the new Anna Wintour!’, a gaggle  of cameras and microphones shadowed his every move at the September  shows. Expectations were high for this highly respected editor, whose  career in publishing began at the tender age of 17 when he created a  homemade music publication (he describes it as a ‘pseudo-magazine’) with  a school friend. In his twenties he set up a Face-like style magazine  in Florence which he edited and art directed called Westuff,  and in the late Nineties contributed to the renaissance of Esquire as  its fashion creative director. During his revolutionary spell at the  New York Times he launched a batch of new titles, including the highly  regarded T magazine in 2004, as well as its award-winning  online companion site. Hopes are high that he can bring the same  revitalising energy to W.
 Written by Elizabeth von Guttman
and Alexia Niedzielski
 Portrait by Alex Salinas
 

  
 Not a lot of people know  this, but at one point in the mid-Nineties you were the creative  director of J. Crew. How did that come about?
 Yes, that was an interesting  in-between experience. When I moved to the States, I wanted to learn as  much as possible about mainstream America. I think if you come to this  country, you have to experience the mass-market, and you know, you  cannot be any more ‘Americana’ than J. Crew; I don’t even think Ralph  Lauren was more ‘Americana’ than J. Crew. I had always worked on niche  publications, like Italian 
Vogue ande, magazines which had the  best photographers and writers but that were really meant for insiders  and had a certain kind of snobbery. So, in coming to America, I tried  not to have that attitude. At the time, Emily Woods was taking the  company over from her father, who founded J. Crew. She was moving the  brand in a new direction and she talked about the catalogues as if they  were books or magazines, which she wanted to have a more editorial  perspective.
 
 
Is it something you want to  re-explore, working with a brand in the future?
 I’m not sure — you never know where  you will end up or where life will take you. At J. Crew, I never had any  involvement in designing the clothes, that’s something that I have no  interest in. I’ve been an editor, fashion editor and a stylist but  unlike some other editors or stylists, I’ve never thought I was a  designer. Just because you like clothes or you wear them well, it  doesn’t mean that you are good designer; there are enough designers out  there.
 
There’s been a lot of  attention over your move to W. Was it difficult to leave T after  creating a bit of a family there?
 It was difficult. I created this  group of magazines at the New York Times and they were really my little  babies, my creatures. I had put together a team of people I really  enjoyed spending time with and I think there was a certain kind of joy  in the magazine and website that was apparent to the reader. At the end,  it was also something I created for myself and not for somebody else,  in terms of who the reader was and that’s always a good way to start,  especially if you want to live a happy life.
 
Your move to W was so widely  documented. It seems like the world has never had such a curiosity  about the fashion industry. What do you make of that?
Fashion has never been as popular as it is today and that’s mainly  because as a business it has become so powerful. There are such large  budgets involved now and brands can really influence the way people  think and behave. Some fashion designers are more influential than film  directors or musicians but they don’t realise it. Tom Ford has had an  incredible influence on society through his fashion. He thinks now he is  a real artist because he is a film director, but actually he did  something very serious as a fashion designer, not just through his  clothes but through his campaigns and his conduct. He really pushed the  boundaries; he was out there and he made that kind of ‘double-sexuality’  accepted, as well as bringing back a love of modernism. At the same  time, it looks like fashion is becoming less and less creative. That’s  kind of the contradiction: as fashion becomes more and more popular,  it’s less creative because there is really less space for strange or  original ideas in such a large system. I think it’s probably a growing  crisis. It’s not just that designers today are less creative than they  used to be — the environment is less creative.
 
Who do you think are now the  most creative designers out there?
I like people who do their own thing and stick to it. I like Raf Simons  very much. His work is very conceptual and considered: the idea comes  before the clothes. I love Miuccia Prada; when you think about how big  Prada is, how many stores they have but they still keep us interested in  what they do and they take risks. And then you have Nicolas Ghesquière,  Stefano Pilati, Alber Elbaz — they’re all very interesting designers  with their own point of view.
 
There are so many shows at  fashion week now, and you’ve said that you don’t think there should be  as many. Do you think brands will continue to show collections in this  traditional way?
I think they’re going to use more plat-forms. Still, the experience is  unique — it’s an experience that you live and you hear and you touch and  you sweat. We still go to the fashion show because the experience you  get there really cannot be substituted by looking at pictures on a  website. But I do think there are too many and some are really  unnecessary. I think there should only be shows when there is something  to show. And then you do a lot of technical presentations that are  really for buyers and the people who are there to sell the clothes, and  then you have a lot of other kind of events that can focus on special  areas of the production. To have four full shows a year is ridiculous I  think. At the same time, they should do as many showroom presentations  as they need — that’s not the problem. It’s business. They have to put  new stuff in the stores, because going to the stores is part of the  entertainment experience. I mean, it’s what young people see as a form  of sport, somehow.