stylegurrl
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- Messages
- 1,452
- Reaction score
- 4
Share with us... Your Best & Worst Collections of Haute Couture F/W 2025.26
Originally posted by faust@Feb 4th, 2004 - 12:06 pm
Oh, Jesus, that's all we needed, TIME magazine to tell people what's stylish....
Actually the Time Style issue has been around for about a year now. I think this is their third or fourth installment and it's actually quite good. A strong, intelligent journalistic setting fits Kate Betts much better than Harper's Bazaar.Originally posted by faust@Feb 4th, 2004 - 3:06 pm
Oh, Jesus, that's all we needed, TIME magazine to tell people what's stylish....
Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon. It just sounds ridiculous.Originally posted by Scott@Feb 5th, 2004 - 11:51 am
It is actually quite good. Not really not like a trend pushing magazine,at all, like most fashion mags in mainstream are--they analyze and actually do quite alot of intelligent things. This is the Kate Betts we saw at Vogue. They did a brilliant list of the most powerful people(women?) in fashion which had the likes of Anna Wintour set alongside the brilliant Linda Loppa.
Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon. It just sounds ridiculous.Originally posted by faust+Feb 5th, 2004 - 10:57 am--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(faust @ Feb 5th, 2004 - 10:57 am)</div><div class='quotemain'> <!--QuoteBegin-Scott@Feb 5th, 2004 - 11:51 am
It is actually quite good. Not really not like a trend pushing magazine,at all, like most fashion mags in mainstream are--they analyze and actually do quite alot of intelligent things. This is the Kate Betts we saw at Vogue. They did a brilliant list of the most powerful people(women?) in fashion which had the likes of Anna Wintour set alongside the brilliant Linda Loppa.
It's actually TIME magazine, not the NYT.Originally posted by Lena@Feb 6th, 2004 - 4:23 am
thanks for reminding me, i need to ask my sis to keep the issue and mail it to me asap, i collect all NYT style supplements, they are quite fun to browse and I adore Horatio Silva![]()
![]()