Tom Ford : Life after Gucci

Tom Ford to show his Spring 2018 collection during NYFW! :woot: And he's ditching see now buy now!

From WWD:

Tom Ford Bids Farewell to See-Now-Buy-Now

The designer plans to show spring 2018 in New York this fall — and relocate his primary residence and women’s studio to Los Angeles.

NEW YORK — Tom Ford is saying goodbye to see-now-buy-now.

The decision follows fall’s one-season experiment during which he staged a tony, civilized affair at the former Four Seasons restaurant in New York.

For spring 2018, Ford will return to the traditional calendar, but not in London, where he’s shown most of his previous women’s collections. Rather, he will seek a permanent slot on the New York Fashion Week calendar, perhaps at the beginning of the week. “I like going first, when everyone is still in a good mood,” he said.

Ford is not only exiting the London fashion calendar. With his husband Richard Buckley and son Jack, he’s moving his primary residence to Los Angeles, though the family will retain its London house. And he has signed a lease on a studio space in L.A. — the old Regen Projects gallery (yes, Hedi Slimane’s former studio) — where he will relocate most of his women’s design staff. The men’s design studio is to remain in London.

Ford revealed the news in a Thursday morning conversation at Spring Studios, where he’s showing his fall collection to press.

He said that while instant fashion is likely the way of the future, it doesn’t work now for a simple reason: The industry isn’t ready from a basic scheduling standpoint.

“The store shipping schedule doesn’t align with the fashion show schedule,” he explained. The bulk of fall ships in August, “but you can’t have a show with clothes that have been on the selling floor for a month.” While his clothes shipped by July, Ford kept them off the floor until the day after the show. “We lost a month of selling. We had merchandise sitting in stockrooms,” he said.

Ford found that many of his specialty store accounts, though at first excited by the prospect of see-now-buy-now, grew frustrated that the clothes had to be kept under wraps until September.

“The first three weeks of September [immediately postshow] business boomed,” he noted, but ultimately, the frenzy didn’t make up for the loss of traditional long-lead press. Thus his return to the traditional schedule — and to New York.

“I need a home [for showing] and a consistency. Paris is crammed full of competition. Milan — been there and done that. London, I’ve tried and tried and tried,” he said, noting that the latter capital just doesn’t get the same level of international attention.

New York, he said, just feels right.
 
^^
The FW17 was already shown to the buyers and all so i suspect that they will release the images by the time it lands into the stores...

I'm not really surprised to see him ditching SNBN. While Tom Ford is a very successful brand, it doesn't have the same capacity as Burberry.
Burberry changed the production and the retail and most of all, thanks to their advertising power, they were able to get the press on board.

It's almost impossible to see Tom Ford clothes in the magazines now. He is totally absent from all the "collections eds". Plus, i think it's good to have some competition. It's still fashion and with a business that big, he cannot just do " à la Alaia".

I think L.A. is a much more inspiring for a designer of his caliber than London. And maybe he will catch that Hedi energy and deliver...
London does not care about big or established brands.

Obviously, for the past 1 year, it showed that fashion wasn't really his main interest. I hope that this will have an impact on him...

Glad to see you back on the circus Tom! Now, concentrate on getting the job done how it should be.
 
Always hated the concept of See Now Buy Now— totally cheapens the air of high fashion and designer clothing: It’s the providence of fast-fashion/ disposable fashion, and always thought the concept of Tom Ford’s lifestyle branding was above such impulses.

For a label that’s so brazenly exclusive from the start, it’s just so astounding, even hilarious, how he’s all over the place— even a floundering mess when it comes to presentation: He still hasn’t got a clue where he wants to show, and I get the impression for all his bravado and vision when it comes to image-making, he still hasn’t figured out how to show his collection. It’s obvious his filmmaking has become a distraction to his fashion and its presentation, in which case I’d prefer him to concentrate on his filmmaking pursuits…

I like that, at his most confident and best, Tom knows exactly who he’s designing for: HIs men and women are individuals that have already found their style— and secure in their already plush lifestyle to care about keeping up with the newest fashion-victimizing designs. He should always remember this.
 
Bridget Foley’s Diary: Tom Ford, Coming Home
Tom Ford talks about the buy-now experiment and why he's moving back to the US. Would you believe Donald Trump played a part?

By Bridget Foley on March 17, 2017

The big, flat box of Dunkin’ Donuts, assorted varieties, sits open, one column short of the dozen, the only non-minimalist appointment in sight. It graces a sleek table in the upstairs seating loft at Studio 2 at Spring Studios. Tom Ford swears that the box isn’t a regular-guy prop, that he has in fact feasted on the missing sugary quartet this morning. “Four doughnuts and three cups of coffee.” When I express skepticism, he insists it’s his typical morning intake. “What?” he fakes reciprocal dismay. “I only eat fish and vegetables the rest of the time.”

The balance works. Dressed in an impeccable lean-cut suit with shirt and tie, Ford looks as svelte as ever and classically debonair, having left the open-to-there shirts of his slightly younger self behind. Yet I wasn’t invited to talk doughnuts or Ford’s eternal good looks. The primary topic: his decision to “abandon” (his word) the see-now-buy-now approach to showing that only last season some progressive industry thinkers considered at the vanguard of best practices. Ford tried it, staging a tony, civilized affair at the former Four Seasons restaurant in New York. The show proved a crowd-pleaser and the clothes, impressive, garnered him an explosion of press and a major postshow selling spurt. But ultimately, the construct didn’t work, so he’s moving on.

That was just the start of his news. Beginning with spring 2018, Ford will show his women’s wear on the traditional schedule, but in New York rather than in his recent base, London, while continuing to present men’s in Milan, “and not mixing them, at least not regularly.” He’ll likely seek an early slot on the New York Fashion Week calendar. “I like going first,” Ford says. “People are in a good mood. You have to think of the psychology. People have had their summer, they’re not worn out yet from fashion.”

Ford is not only exiting fashion week in London. He and his family, husband Richard Buckley and son Jack, are moving from there to Los Angeles, where they’ve recently bought a heck of a house. It once belonged to Betsy and Alfred Bloomingdale, and had a reported, though most definitely unconfirmed, purchase price, of $39 million. (By the way, Ford offers that Jack is “adorable and freakishly smart.” A photo bears out the former condition; as for the latter, we’ll have to take the proud dad’s word.) And Ford has signed a lease on a studio space in L.A. — the old Regen Projects gallery (yes, Hedi Slimane’s former studio) — where he will relocate most of his women’s design staff, while keeping the men’s studio in London. Phew!

Ford came to New York for a day of press appointments on Thursday. Fall 2017 “is sold and done. But I wanted to bring it to New York and show New York editors,” he says. The trip was arranged hastily, as for a while, he was uncertain how or even whether to show fall after his decision to forego the runway this time out.

The reason: His preoccupation with thinking through his retreat from see-now-buy-now, and what other alternatives might exist. Since reentering the women’s arena, Ford has been in the forefront of experimentation with methods of showing, garnering high praise and vivisection for various efforts. He works from an almost scientific resolve, experimental in the true sense of the word: He goes all-in to test a promising hypothesis with a conviction rare in fashion.

“I don’t have fear,” Ford says. “You have to do what feels right, you have to try things. I don’t let fear stop me. It doesn’t mean I don’t second-guess myself constantly, right up until the end — ‘Oh my God, is this right, is that right? Should that be that? Should I have kept this off? God, should I make those skirts out of Lycra?’…And blah blah blah. But you can’t let that stop you.”

When efforts haven’t worked, he’s admitted it. Now, he muses, only half-joking, that all the luxury types who pooh-poohed the buy-now concept — which were just about all the luxury types but for Ralph Lauren and Burberry’s Christopher Bailey — will garner some satisfaction from being proven right, for the moment.

Yet he still believes that immediacy is the ultimate way of the future. “Doesn’t everyone want everything now?” he queries, rhetorically. However, in the present, see-now-buy-now can’t work for a very simple reason: The industry’s numerous schedules aren’t in sync.

Ford notes he had no production issues — “we shipped in July” — and that during the three weeks immediately postshow, business boomed at retail. Overall, however, “The store shipping schedule doesn’t align with the fashion show schedule.” The bulk of fall ships in August, “but you can’t have a show with clothes that have been on the selling floor for a month.” Ford kept his off the floor until the day after the show, insisting that his retail partners did the same. “We lost a month of selling. We had merchandise sitting in stockrooms all over the world.” Many of those retailers, though at first excited by the prospect of see-now-buy-now, grew frustrated that the clothes had to be kept under wraps until September.

Ultimately, the focused frenzy didn’t make up for the loss of traditional long-lead press and the additional selling time. Spring would create a different issue, given its shorter lead time. “Our clothes are just now fully in the stores, and we have missed all the fashion weeks,” Ford notes.

Thus, his return to the traditional schedule. And his permanent (at least for now) runway migration to New York. After the success of his second directorial film effort, “Nocturnal Animals,” Ford wants to spend the next few years focusing solely on fashion. He is definitely in growth mode, particularly with women’s. Men’s accounts for about 60 percent of his business and women’s, 40, a ratio he’d like to reverse. But he admits to a stronger comfort level in the men’s arena. “I’m my own muse. On a good day, I can look 45. I’m a sample size 48, and if I want it for myself, I make it.” A recent addition, underwear, in store for fourth quarter, is men’s only for now. “I thought it was time my name was wrapped around the hips of 25-year-old men, boys. I’ve been waiting to say that,” he offers, in his typical deadpan delivery.

He thinks that having a regular presence on the traditional women’s schedule will support a structure that will benefit that side of the business. “I need a home for fashion shows and a consistency, so that you can start to think, ‘OK, this is where he shows, this is what it’s about, this is what he did last season, this is what he’s doing now. There’s a certain consistency,” he says. “Paris is crammed full of competition; Milan, been there, done that.… London, I’ve tried and tried and tried, and honestly London Fashion Week is not the same. It doesn’t attract the international press. So I needed to pick one. And the shows I’ve had in New York have worked very well.”

The residential move, from London to Los Angeles, is more nuanced. Having spent the better part of a year in Los Angeles because of the film, he was reminded of the appeal of sunshine after 18 years in “dark London.” That move is a homecoming of sorts, a concept that appeals to Ford now more than ever, as a family man who’s admittedly no spring chicken himself. “I grew up in the American West. The older I get, the more pulled back I am to a more rural…” perhaps conjuring images of his soon-to-be-residence, he rethinks “rural” “…I need sunshine. L.A. is the least city of all cities.” His parents live on the West Coast, as does his sister and her children. “Jack has a family there. A lot of it is personal.”

The presidential election also impacted Ford’s decision to move, surprisingly so. Unlike those celebrities who vowed in its lead-up to leave the country if Donald Trump won, Ford found an opposite pull. “Oddly, it made me want to come back even more,” he notes. “We have a tremendous number of people in this country who feel disenfranchised and clearly we are not relating to or speaking to them. I am at my core American, and it made me want to come back. It didn’t make me want to run away.

“I think when you sense that there is a divide in your country and that there are people who perhaps you’re not relating to, and that those of us who are fortunate enough to live in a world of very liberal human rights and privilege, it’s a wake-up call that we’re not addressing a big part of the country that does feel disenfranchised. It made me feel more nationalistic, if anything. The whole country is not like New York and L.A. and the world that I am used to living in.”
WWD
 
Ok. THIS feels much more like the Tom Ford I have been waiting on. The pieces towards the end were not my favourite and verging on disaster, but when one or two colours were involved, I loved it so much !
 
That new collection is fabulous! It couldn't have been better!
It shows in that collection that he was really focused on fashion. This is very different and very elevated compared to the collections he has released during the "Nocturnal Animals" era (FW15-SS17).

That collection deserve it own thread! Fabulous!!
 
YES! This Fall collection is fabulous. This is what was missing from the Spring see-now-buy-now lookbook. I adore the colored hosiery with those fantastic shoes. Very sharp.
 
Latest Interview from New York Magazine, August 7-20, 17. Fall Fashion Issue:
(interesting what he says in the last answer about the SS collection)


digital edition of newyorkmagazine via zinio
 
I need to know when will he debut his watch line....:(
 
^^
I think that he will present it for the next Baselworld. So maybe March 2018.
I believe he wants his timepieces line to be more like the Dior Homme chiffre Rouge line than the Gucci "fashion" timepieces line.

That last interview is interesting even if he said what he usually says about his movies.
He should reconsider his views on fashion because good clothes last forever and watching a fashion show manytimes can gives me as much emotion than a movie. Fashion is much more powerful because it impact our lives .

Yes Tom, you should do what you do best. That's what we wanted from the beginning. The pumps he did for Gucci SS2001 are everywhere this season and as we are living in a very 90's/early 00's nostalgic era, his work is much more copied than before.
His best collections under his own name (FW2012, SS2013, SS2015 & FW2016) were the ones were he revisited his past while adding a new touch. I'm glad to read the words "new way" coming from him. I think he should work less & less with Carine and give a new perspective to his work.

I want great clothes to wear everyday, i don't care about Redcarpet TOM!
 
THE NEW MADISON AVENUE STORE NOW OPEN

Bridget Foley’s Diary: Tom Ford Moves on Madison
Tom Ford talks about his next show, Halston's socks, school moms' yoga pants and his shiny new store on Madison Avenue.

By Bridget Foley on June 29, 2017

“I have never been meek.”
Never mind that those words could be Tom Ford’s personal manifesto and, when the time comes (many years hence, knock on wood), his epitaph. On Monday morning, he stated the obvious by way of contextualizing the powerful design of his new New York store, at 672 Madison Avenue.
Ford spoke on the phone from London, the base from which he’d been weighing in daily — his staffers might say constantly — as workers readied the space for its soft opening today. The official opening will be marked with a cocktail party on Sept. 7, the day after Ford’s spring 2018 show.
Our Monday morning, conversation followed a walk-through of the store, a field trip that more than supported the designer’s antimeek declaration. It also displayed an interesting degree of activity — merchandisers filling shelves and racks despite the last-minute construction work under way; some ceiling coverings — mirrors, stainless steel, a portion of a high-tech, reflective fabric — remained uninstalled. On Wednesday, a minor mirror mishap caused WWD’s shoot to be pushed back just a bit, 30 minutes or so.
Even almost finished, the space pulsed with urbane chic of a sort very different from that of Ford’s first retail outpost, up the avenue a bit at 70th Street. That store (closed permanently after business hours on Sunday) was modeled after the designer’s London Mayfair home and paid homage to gentlemanly British elegance. This one, all black, white, gray and silver, flaunts an audacious modernism informed by late-Seventies glamour, the results every bit as impressive but more gender-neutral than the original.
A grand staircase, its balustrade a thick spiral of black fiberglass, anchors the double-height entry. Beyond, a series of salons is proportioned for graceful intimacy: women’s handbags immediately past the entrance; to the right, fine jewelry, to which watches will be added when that collection launches early in 2018; further back, ready-to-wear and shoes, the latter anchored by a white marble fireplace beneath a commissioned abstract art piece, a combination of clay and plated silver. Finally, a mirrored, marbled jewel box of a space houses beauty, fragrance and eyewear.
Upstairs, the VIP room with off-white sueded walls overlooks the entrance, its long curtains affording privacy without blocking the ample natural light. The second floor also features men’s wear — luggage, sportswear, shoes, perfumery, shirting and suiting, the last featuring tony Macassar ebony wardrobes and a second fireplace. In time for today’s opening, a workroom with a full-time staff of five tailors was set to be fully operational.
Throughout, various marbles play against granite flooring, chrome, mirrors and stainless steel, achieving multiple degrees of high-impact reflection.
Here, Ford reflects on his move down Madison, as well on other fashion matters.

WWD: Ten years after opening on Madison Avenue, why change locations?
Tom Ford: There is completely different traffic at [the new] location. You get not only the traffic of our customers who live uptown, but you also get a completely different group. Let’s be real, we’re across the street from Barneys and that means a lot. But that’s not the only reason. The very first store was built in 2007. At that time I didn’t have women’s, and it was built as a men’s store. We adapted it for a women’s store, but it never really functioned properly for both men’s and women’s.
WWD: This store feels visually powerful yet more feminine than the first store. Maybe “more feminine” is the wrong way to say it. The other store looked more traditionally masculine.
T.F.: Because it was built as a men’s store; [the original store] was very Macassar [ebony] heavy. It’s beautiful. In a lot of ways it kind of broke my heart to leave it and to see all that demolished. But it was also heavy compared to where our store design is today. So it was three reasons: location, space and then a fresher design, more to the design of our Miami and Los Angeles stores.
WWD: What elements have you retained from the first store?
T.F.: There’s a little bit of Macassar in this store. And certain things, building the rooms around fireplaces, which we have always done; certain pieces of furniture, certain fixtures, the gray metal cases for the clothing, certain things that are us and our signature and that you try to hang onto because they give you your identity as a brand.
WWD: Why the fireplaces?
T.F.: The very first store on Madison was really a copy of my house at the time, in Mayfair, in London. We copied my mirrors, my urns, my sofas. I literally went through and pulled out pieces of furniture and lamp fixtures and things I had designed myself and replicated it in that store. That’s where that came from, the grouping around fireplaces.
WWD: The new aesthetic is very different from that of the first store, more modernist versus sumptuous classic. How did you get from one to the other?
T.F.: The Gucci stores were a copy of my Neutra house in Los Angeles — the Vladimir Kagan sofas, the lines. So I suppose when I set about designing the first Tom Ford store, I was very aware of what I had done at Gucci and then later at Saint Laurent, Bottega and all the other [Gucci Group/Kering] stores, and I wanted to go away from that. Now that the brand is established, perhaps I’m more comfortable in coming back to what my actual true, innate aesthetic is, which is toward a certain minimalism and modernism.
WWD: You worked with architect Bill Sofield again, right?
T.F.: I worked with Bill on all of those stores. My God, Bill and I have worked together on Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega, Sergio Rossi, Boucheron, we have worked together on literally hundreds of stores, which is amazing. We met, I think, in 1994 and we have been working together ever since.
WWD: What spoke to you about this space?
T.F.: First of all, location, that is the number one. And then the double-height entry so that it could feel somewhat grand as you walked in. When you then go into the other spaces, the ceilings are not ridiculously high, which works to create that residential feel. It’s a residential building.
WWD: And how does this store differ from the aesthetic of Miami and Los Angeles?
T.F.: We’re in New York, and instantly that sets up a different vocabulary. The lacquered stairs as you walk in, which isn’t really lacquer but that beautiful black stair and the mirrored ceiling.
It’s very glamorous. I tend to constantly be drawn back to that very glamorous, late Seventies period of architecture. If you look at Halston’s offices at the Olympic Towers, he was way, way, way up. I believe he had red carpeting, but the walls were just folding mirrored screens. And I believe there was even a mirrored ceiling in some of those rooms. So it was all that reflection. We mirrored the ceiling. The reflection and slick surfaces are a nod to where we are, New York. I like that slick aspect of New York.
wwd/tomford.com
 
WWD: So, a Halston connection.
T.F.: He was also obsessed with orchids, which I am as well, and he had tables full of orchids and folding mirrored screens and chrome everywhere. It was very glamorous and very much of the period. In fact, the sofas with the round bolsters, which I have used over and over ad nauseam in my houses and in all the stores, they have become a kind of signature of my stores. They came originally from the gray sofas in Halston’s town house on 63rd Street, which was done by Paul Rudolph. There is a famous picture of him sitting in a gray outfit with red socks on, in one of those gray chairs in his living room.
WWD: Not a vague connection — a direct Halston inspiration?
T.F.: Direct inspiration, for years, from Halston. I think Bill and I both share that inspiration. Well, definitely we share that period in New York. We had mutual friends in college. Our influences and cultural references are identical.
WWD: This store is mostly about the slick surface with new artwork you commissioned for the space. But it’s all integrated architecturally — none of the major artwork of the first store.
T.F.: The original store had my own artwork in it. It had a Calder in it; it had an Arp in it; it had a Fontana when you walked in the door. It had a Lalanne crocodile table.
WWD: What will become of that Lalanne table? It was such a focal point.
T.F.: The Lalanne table is where it belongs — in my house. And so is the Arp and so is the Calder and so is the Fontana. They were kind of on loan to get the store open.
WWD: The staircase makes for a major, glamorous statement. I don’t want to use the word imposing…
T.F.: Well it is imposing. I mean, I suppose I can’t help myself with that. I have never been meek. I want you to walk in and go, “Oh my God, look at that!”
WWD: How is your approach to opening a store different today than 10 years ago, when social media and e-commerce were in a very, very different place.
T.F.: It has not changed for me. I think a store, especially a store in New York, is still an incredibly important statement for your brand. You can shop online, and we have a beautiful web site where we do a great business, but walking in a store and being greeted by people in the store and the service that you receive, the store is a completely different experience…and service, service, service is so much a part of what we do. Our men’s business is almost 30 percent made to measure, made to order.
WWD: Really?
T.F.: Yes. People come in and they want to look through swatches, be measured, sit down, have a coffee, talk about which fabric do you like, or your wife or your husband or someone with you, and order a suit, yes.
WWD: How is the women’s shopper’s mentality different from the men’s?
T.F.: They are totally different. Your male customers are loyal. They come in, they find a suit that they like, they have a shape that they like, they find a pant that they like, they come back, they come back, they come back, they come back, they come back, they come back. A woman — maybe you have her for a couple of seasons if she finds something she wants and she identifies with you. But if she is a woman who consumes fashion, she is looking [around] and she goes wherever what she wants at that moment is.
WWD: How do you build a loyal women’s clientele given that reality?
T.F.: If you’re lucky, a lot of women identify with what you’re doing. A lot of women identify with what we do, which is great. But it’s also sometimes challenging [creatively], when you have a loyal customer base, to break out of what you’re known for. If certain things sell over and over and over, your stores want to just keep buying them and buying them…so it’s tricky. That’s something I’m going to address in my September show.
WWD: Speaking of which, your September show, which is not see-now-buy-now-wear-now…
T.F.: No it is not. It is see now, buy in five months.
WWD: Where and when?
T.F.: At the Park Avenue Armory, Wednesday at 7 p.m.
WWD: You mean the first Wednesday, after Labor Day, right?
T.F.: I think it’s good because people have come back. They’ve had two days to settle in from the long weekend, they’re still tan, they’re still happy, they’re not burned out yet, they’re not tired of everything. It’s not nine at night, it’s seven at night, and then you can go out to dinner, whatever. I thought it was a good slot.
WWD: You’ve always shown early in the season.
T.F.: I like to start or finish.
WWD: Back to the balancing demand for the known with newness…
T.F.: [Retailers] want the same thing because it sells. Especially in today’s world, everyone is terrified, and so they want a sure thing. I’m lucky in this way, I have a few key items that the moment they get into the store they sell. So the [danger] is that if you keep doing that [too deeply], you don’t evolve. I’m going to ignore [the expectation of repetition] and present what I want to present in September and see what happens.
WWD: What always sells for you?
T.F.: Oh my God, a sequined dress with a zipper, a sequined dress with a zipper, a sequined dress with a zipper. I mean, there are lots of other things, but that’s the one. I mean, every variation and mutation of that.
WWD: Where do you see the women’s business developing over all?
T.F.: I find what’s happening in women’s wear really bizarre. Women don’t wear day clothes anymore. I don’t understand the concept of day clothes. I had to really think about this. I had to think, well, why don’t I understand the concept of day clothes? And the reason is women don’t wear day clothes anymore.
[My son] Jack’s school in L.A. — I watch what everyone wears in the morning when drop-off happens.
WWD: Yoga pants.
T.F.: They’re all wearing casual clothes, yoga pants, T-shirts, jeans. You see those same women at lunch, and all they’ve done is they’ve slipped on a pair of great shoes and they’ve popped on a jacket over their T-shirt. So they’re wearing jeans, a T-shirt, a jacket and shoes, that’s it. But at night, they get completely dressed. It seems to be the same in New York from what I can tell; I don’t spend enough time there. But in L.A., no one dresses.
So Jack’s school here — we’re back in London for the summer, and school goes through the end of July — all of the women at drop-off are wearing the exact same thing [as in L.A.]: yoga pants, a T-shirt ans trainers or jeans, a T-shirt and trainers. I see those same women at lunch, what have they done? Fancy shoes, popped on a jacket, still the jeans, still the T-shirt. I see those women out at night, totally dressed. Women aren’t wearing day clothes in the way that they used to.
WWD: From a fashion-business perspective, how do you deal with that?
T.F.: Drop day. You just drop it. You make great jackets. You make things that you can break apart. You show it all together. You make potent pieces, you make a potent jacket, you make potent shoes, you make potent items that — with your jeans, your T-shirt and your trainers, or a great pair of shoes with your jeans and your T-shirt — say, “I’m cool, I’m great, I consume fashion.” You make great items. And then you make evening.
WWD: Evening sells?
T.F.: Evening dresses, $25,000 is no problem. Our buyers often say we need more; we sell them like crazy. Like crazy. I mean, you don’t have to sell those like crazy. You sell two and you’ve had an amazing day in a store.
WWD: I would think.
T.F.: We can easily sell four of those on a key weekend in awards season in Los Angeles. We sold two last year that were $50,000. Now, there are very few [of those] customers, but we know who they are and they come back to us.
WWD: Back to day, I think our increasingly casual lifestyle is a major issue for fashion today, one the traditional luxury market is struggling to deal with.
T.F.: Women really do dress high-low….As I said, it’s about producing those very potent items. That amazing jacket, the amazing pair of shoes, those things that you’re going have in your closet 20 years later, you’ll pull it out and put it on again over a T-shirt and jeans and it’s going to look amazing. And then evening, beautifully constructed eveningwear or leather. Beautifully constructed items like that, no one can touch those.
WWD: You’ve really thought about this.
T.F.: I’ve thought about it. I have to say it upsets me because, again, I’m of a certain vintage that I remember how people took such care to dress when they got on an airplane. People today don’t do that.
Spending time in Los Angeles this year has made a huge difference in how I see clothing, for women in particular. London is a bit of a bubble where both men and women still do dress in a throwback to another time, at least many women and men who have a lot of money. Obviously, there’s great young style here and people who don’t have a lot of money, who are ultra stylish and fabulous, but London is a highly bourgeois city where women and men [who have money] still dress in a way that [developed] many years ago.
That is very attractive to me. But it is artificial. You could live here and you could start to think, “This is how you dress when you go to lunch, and this is how you dress [for other situations].” And in London, at a certain level, you do. But in the rest of the world, that’s gone; people don’t do that anymore. Living in Los Angeles, I feel excited about this season because I feel like someone shook me a bit, and I’m a bit more awake.
WWD: Interesting.
T.F.: So it’ll be interesting to see if I can put that on the runway.
WWD: Back to retail. Are there any stores upcoming?
T.F.: Not at the moment. We have…I think, this is 128 stores. I own 28 of them, and some of the others are franchised and some are shops-in-shop in department stores. But I think we’re pretty much covered in most major markets where we should be. So at the moment, no.
WWD: You’re covered in major markets, and content with that scope. Another issue for the industry now is the constant drive for growth, growth, growth. At some point, the concept is antithetical to that of luxury.
T.F.: It’s absolutely true, without then having to broaden your distribution, lower your price point and compromise potentially the long-term power of your brand. That’s why I am so happy that I am a private company and in control, because if I were a public company, I would be pushed to be doing things that I don’t necessarily believe in.
WWD: “Brand.” Back when, fashion companies were “houses.” In a world in which everything and everyone is a brand, does the word mean anything?
T.F.: I hate that word. I have always hated that word. I hated that word at Gucci, I hate that word at Tom Ford. I hate that word. Brand and branding, I hate that more. Although the word I hate the most right now is disruption.
I just want to — every time I read that word I just cringe. [Laughs] Oh what she’s doing is so disruptive. Oh, we want to disrupt the blah, blah, blah market. I hate it.
WWD: I’m with you. What I like is, “what I’m doing is so disruptive.” I mean, let others be the judge of that. Discretion — not a modern concept.
T.F.: The people I follow on Instagram, the daily photo of themselves in front of something. Don’t you remember the time when you would be embarrassed to even have a picture of yourself out in your house? You just wouldn’t do that. And now people are so comfortable, even quite sophisticated people, taking pictures of themselves constantly. I find it so bizarre.
WWD: Let’s not end with “ugh.” Is there anything else you’d like to add about the store?
T.F.: Does it look expensive?
WWD: So expensive.
T.F.: Oh good, I love that.
same source
 
Tom Ford: What's Next
With his brand on track to hit nearly $2 billion in retail sales in 2017, the designer is on a quest for global dominance. Next up? New York Fashion Week.

NEW YORK, United States — “****ing Fabulous.” It’s a bang-on description of the designer Tom Ford, but also the name of his latest limited-edition fragrance, set to launch exclusively at the brand’s directly owned retail stores just in time for his Spring/Summer 2018 runway show in New York on Wednesday evening.

“You hear [****] on television all the time. In a way it’s lost its edge, but nobody had put it on a bottle of perfume,” Ford laughs. It’s Labour Day in a makeshift office in the Park Avenue Armory, where the 56-year-old designer will debut his latest collection in T-57 hours. The room, scented with his own “Tobacco Vanille” candle, is fully furnished in black, tables accented with clusters of blush-pink cymbidium orchids. It’s as if Ford was a pop star who had included demands for such backstage flourishes in his rider. “I don't actually need as fancy as they always provide for me,” he says, reclining in a moleskine-covered chair, full suit and white shirt buttoned down to there. “I’m actually simpler than people think.”

Perhaps. But at this point in Ford’s 30-plus year career, which has encompassed the mid-1990s revival of Gucci, an overlapping stint at Yves Saint Laurent, the formation of the Gucci Group with longtime business partner Domenico De Sole, a turn as an Oscar-nominated filmmaker and, most importantly, the architect of his namesake brand, he is very much a celebrity in his own right. (The kind that can’t go shopping at Neiman Marcus in Beverly Hills during the day because too many people stop him for pictures or to chat about lipstick.)

But back to the fragrance — and that name. “You know, one day I said, ‘Oh my god, this is ****ing fabulous.' And I thought, ‘Why don’t we just call it that?’”

Ford, unsurprisingly, is fully cognisant of the potency of such a marketing message. (In fact, he uses the word “potent” several times over the course of our conversation to describe everything from a handbag to an advertising campaign.) “Even if the fragrance was not good, our customer is looking for a gift at Christmas for somebody who has everything... it worked in a lot of ways,” he says. “And it is a good fragrance. It is ****ing fabulous.”

There’s something inherently straightforward and, really, American about Ford and his brand. Sexy, sharp, unwavering. No waffling here.

And that may be truer than ever, as Ford lays out his ambitious plans to become one of the top five luxury brands in the world, with annual retail revenue — encompassing all categories — on track to hit nearly $2 billion in 2017, according to market sources. “I've never understood people who want to do something and be number two, or number four or five or 47.”

Step No. 1: Own New York Fashion Week

Since launching women’s ready-to-wear in 2010, Ford has experimented with presentation format, releasing a video starring Lady Gaga one season, showing in Los Angeles the next. “We jumped around into all sorts of things,” he admits.

For the first go around — Spring 2011 — he banned social media from his intimate runway show. “I think it was misunderstood because I blacked out the phones. It wasn't because I was trying to be elitist and that I didn’t believe in the internet,” he says. “It was because I was trying to do a — what is it? — a ‘see now, buy now’ collection. I wanted to hold the images back until it was available in the stores and then we could flood everything.”

The effort was certainly memorable. The season’s backstage model board, populated with headshots of muses Beyoncé, Lauren Hutton, Julianne Moore and others, is burned into the brains of fashion’s most ardent followers. However, when Ford made a more structured shift to “see now, buy now” — he cringes at the idiom — for his Autumn 2017 runway show, the experiment fell short of expectations.

“It did not work,” he says flatly. “I still think the concept is right, but the show calendar does not align with the retail calendar. So we lost — which I knew we were going to — six weeks of selling by not putting the fall clothes on the floor until September 7.” Ford believed the bump in sales around the show would supplant the loss. And it did, he says, for the first three or four weeks. But then it levelled out. “And, of course, we lost all editorial.”

The fact is, Ford’s core female customer does indeed shop for fall clothes in August, and continues to scan print magazine editorial for inspiration. “I have a very loyal customer who has followed me from Gucci,” he says. “They were in their thirties when I was in my thirties. They’re now in their fifties, approaching 60. That customer? She still reads magazines. Yes, she’s on Instagram and she’s contemporary and she lives in an urban world, but she still likes to hold a magazine.”

So Ford is giving his customer what he believes she wants: a runway show, in New York City, with the opportunity to order pieces from the collection five months ahead of time at a trunk show in his Madison Avenue store the following day. Oh, and a full-on after party. (Virgil Abloh is DJing.) “I haven’t done anything exuberant in a long time. I used to give these hedonistic parties at Gucci. Alcohol-fuelled — and in many cases, drug-fuelled — these big parties that people used to love. My life changed a lot when I quit drinking, quit doing drugs, quit smoking, quit all of these things, and it does make you more sober,” says the designer, who stopped it all eight years ago. “It made my clothes more sober. It took me a while maybe to be able to get back to being able to be joyful and silly without alcohol.”

He also plans to stay on the New York calendar for at least a few seasons. After living primarily in London with husband Richard Buckley for the past two decades, his family has mostly relocated to LA, where his four-year-old son recently enrolled in school. Ford also moved his women’s design studio to the West Coast, taking over Hedi Slimane’s old Saint Laurent studio in the space that formerly housed the famous Regen Projects art gallery. (Ford’s men’s design studio remains in London.)

“I thought it was really important to have a proper show during a Fashion Week,” he says. “And I’d like to remain in to New York, at least for a few seasons, so that people know, ‘Oh, okay, Tom Ford. He’s on the calendar. He shows then.’ That’s important from a business standpoint, to try to have that consistency that I have lacked.”

Step No. 2: Woo the Next Generation

“What do I hope this show will do for us? I hope it brings in a younger customer,” Ford says. “It’s a departure. It’s a bit more modern.”

While Ford says he can sell anything with an exposed zipper or a pile of sequins, his women’s collections have struggled to deliver a brand vision that captures the heart strings of the new luxury shopper — the one buying lots of Gucci, his old stomping ground. Once upon a time, designers more often than not told a new story each season, with an aesthetic thread holding it all together. Today’s most successful designers — Gucci’s Alessandro Michele, Vetements’ Demna Gvasalia — tell the same story over and over, only tweaking it ever so slightly each season.

“When I left fashion in 2004, what I showed on the runway was exactly how I wanted women to look. The hair that I thought was right for the season, the makeup that I thought was right for the season, the clothes that were right for the season, the shoe of the season and the bag the season,” he says. “I think now, in a show, people look for items and everything is so exaggerated that it often almost looks like costumes, but when you break it down there’s a great jacket or a great bag. Women are buying items that are very potent and concentrated that can give them the feeling of the season. I have to hand it to Alessandro, who used to work with me at Gucci. He’s so talented, and some of those bags are incredible. All you need is that.”

It’s high praise, and indicative of a certain inherent modesty in Ford that is unexpected given his unabashedly assertive public persona. But it’s clear he has learned something from Michele’s success, and is applying those lessons to his own strategy.

“I love Alessandro. I’m so happy for him, I’m happy about what he’s doing. It took me a long time to get to that place because I felt...being at Gucci was not a pleasant or positive thing, and it took me a long time to get over it,” he says. “A long time. Alessandro, doing what he's doing now, has helped me with that because I am genuinely happy and think he deserves it. I’m impressed when I see what he does. So that’s nice.”

Ford has also been thinking quite a lot about the 1990s, a decade that he helped to define and is currently a point of reference for the next generation of consumers. It’s been 22 years since Ford’s Autumn 1995 collection for Gucci hit the catwalk. As goes with the trend cycle, those low-slung hip-huggers and open-neck satin blouses that entirely shifted the direction of fashion for the next decade are interesting once again.

“It was the right thing at the right time, which is what fashion is all about,” he says. “I suppose this collection, for me, is a bit of a throwback in a way to the spirit of my collections at Gucci in the '90s. I’ve been watching this '90s revival and I thought, ‘Well, I should do that.’ Your tendency, once you’ve done something, is to move on. But then when you realise, okay, that’s kind of back in the air again, then maybe I should go back in that direction a bit.”

And yet, trends mean something different than they used to. Today, the market is highly fragmented. For a designer like Ford, who was trained on Seventh Avenue, it’s an entirely new way of thinking. “Everything is popular at the same time, and you can wear vintage of anything, so there isn’t one trend anymore. If you have an amazing '60s jacket or an amazing 80s jacket, you can wear it,” says Ford, who has been building his own archive since leaving what was then known as the Gucci Group in 2004. (He paid $90,000 for a beaded dress from his final Yves Saint Laurent collection.) “Before, once you knew what the trend was, you could jump ahead of it. Now, it’s so hard because everything is out there.”

But it’s not only about how today’s customer puts together looks, it’s also about what she actually wears. While suiting remains a major driver of sales for Ford’s men’s customer — 11 percent of that business is made-to-measure — he readily acknowledges the casualisation of culture and has shifted the way his collection is merchandised to reflect that.

“Women’s daytime clothes have evaporated,” he says. “Women do not consume or wear day clothes anymore: they wear jeans, a t-shirt, a cool jacket and a great pair of shoes. Evening, however — in LA, in New York, in London — is mega, because it’s red carpet, it’s a charity event...what used to be a day suit for me is now evening for people.”

Step No. 3: Maintain Freak-Level Control

While Ford says his women’s business is profitable and growing, it still only constitutes 30 percent of the company’s overall apparel revenue. He would like it to be split down the middle between women’s and men’s, although it’s not that easy. “The problem with having core products that sell and sell and sell” — he’s talking about the zippers and the sequins — “is that your buyers are going to buy them. It's hard to break out of that and to expand.”

In order to do so, Ford is keen to maintain a direct relationship with his consumer — the majority of his apparel sales are through his own stores, not wholesale partners — with a focus on service. “With so many of our women’s sales, we go to their houses. Our stores do private appointments after 6pm. We have one person per sales person,” he says. “We can not only control the way the store looks, but we can provide a level of service that you can't get in a specialty store. That level of service to me is the thing that will keep stores relevant for us and give us an edge.”

What has also given Ford an edge is the control he maintains over every aspect of the brand. While Ford declined to comment on specifics, public records indicate that, as a majority stakeholder in Tom Ford International, he owns 63.75 percent of shares, while longtime business partner, current chairman and former Gucci Group chief executive Domenico De Sole owns 11.25 percent. The remaining 25 percent is owned by Ermenegildo Zegna chief executive Gildo Zegna (who owns 15 percent) and Américo Amorim Group, which sold part of its stake to Zegna in 2013. The fragrance and beauty licenses with Estée Lauder Companies and eyewear license with Marcolin are controlled directly by Tom Ford’s personal holding company.

All of this means Ford has the final word on every decision. He designs the clothes, yes, but he also shoots the ad campaigns and manages the licenses Estée Lauder, Marcolin and now, watches with Shinola founder Tom Kartsotis’ company, Bedrock Manufacturing, with which Ford partnered to develop Swiss-made timepieces that will launch in the spring of 2018. (An announced men’s underwear line has been delayed.)

“I’m part of the team and they are part of my organisation,” Ford says of such partnerships. “They’re not some licenses where I say, ‘Go and do some lipsticks.’ As silly as it sounds, I put the lipsticks on: Is it too sticky? Do I like the smell? Do I like the taste?”

To be sure, part of the reason Ford can be so exacting is that he began his business on fragrance and eyewear instead of jumping head-on into apparel.

It’s a strategy that has worked. Tom Ford sells about 1.6 million pairs of eyewear a year, and in Estée Lauder’s latest fiscal year, sales of the Tom Ford fragrance and cosmetics businesses combined were up 52 percent. While the beauty conglomerate does not break out sales of Tom Ford product, industry sources indicate that his beauty and fragrances lines will generate $500 million in net sales in 2017.

“It’s very rare to see someone successful in men’s, women’s and beauty in such a short time period. When you think of the legacy of the great designer brands that have become so famous globally, most of those took 30-70 years to establish. Tom Ford has been able to accomplish that in 10,” says John Demsey, executive group president at the Estée Lauder Companies. “Quite honestly, what Tom has been able to do along with Estée Lauder is unprecedented.”
businessoffashion
 
continued...
“I had the name recognition from Gucci and Saint Laurent to be able to go backwards,” Ford says. “At the time, to be honest, I thought that maybe that was all I was going to do. I was pretty burnt out when I left Gucci. I was doing 16 collections a year and as you know, fashion designers now burn out all the time.”

Of course, he eventually did make clothes — not to mention feature films — which have rendered him one of the few fashion talents whose name flows naturally in the cultural conversation, worthy of Jay Z song titles. Would he ever sell to one of those conglomerates in order to further amplify that star power? Globally, there are already 49 directly owned freestanding stores and 77 shop-in-shops. Total retail sales of the Tom Ford brand — including eyewear, fragrance, cosmetics, ready-to-wear, men’s and women’s accessories — are on track to hit nearly $2 billion in 2017.

And yet, the support of a larger company, or a private equity firm, could make it easier to grow to the heights of an Hermès or Chanel, which generate upward of $5 billion in net revenues annually.

“I don't see European conglomerates moving on Tom Ford. LVMH typically buys brands with a long heritage. Kering decided to part ways with Tom long ago, and I doubt they'd reverse this decision now,” notes BNP Paribas luxury analyst Luca Solca. “Private equity may be a different story — they have ventured into apparel and high-end fashion already…After all, private equity [invested in] Roberto Cavalli and Versace. Why not Tom Ford?”

For now, Ford is adamant that he is not interesting in selling a majority stake. “You know, never say never. Who knows? But right now, absolutely not. I enjoy being a privately owned company,” he says. “At Gucci, I had my share of shareholder meetings and sometimes we had to make decisions that weren't in the best interest of the long term business just to make sure that our quarterly earnings and that the stock stayed at a certain place. I did not enjoy that. The pressures of a publicly traded company are incredible. And the nice thing is, I make the decisions. I also can't be kicked out.”

Which brings us back to the Armory. And show time. “If you're not in the game, you can't win the game,” Ford says. “I've tried all sorts of different things. I need to come back to shows and compete. It will take me a few seasons and maybe it won’t ever happen. But my goal is still to build one of the top five or 10 luxury brands in the world.” ****ing fabulous.
businessoffashion
 
He should shut up about himself for at least a year.

Work Tom.

Just work.
 
^ Well the beauty of it seems to be that he manages to work AND talk about himself without one or the other dominating too much of his time. Multitasking, I believe, is what they call it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,909
Messages
15,203,332
Members
86,944
Latest member
Wolfe
Back
Top