UK Marie Claire November 2017 : Winona Ryder by Camilla Armbrust

[serendipity8777]

marieclaire.co.uk

 

[eneroenero]

Winona?? what happens at her face??

 

[Benn98]

The art direction is vile and looks very amateur, but wow, what a beautiful shoot with Winona. Crop that third shot and it would make a better cover option, actually. This is certainly an upgrade for Marie Claire.

 

[Lucien112]

She has a nearly perfect face. Why would they mess that up? This is offensive.

 

[kokobombon]

Did they mess her face with photoshop or did she have something done? I saw the thumb on a digital issues site and didn´t even recognize her

 

[June]

Same here, I would have sworn it's not Winona if it wasn't for her name on the cover. And I'm still doubting it.

 

[narcyza]

Ouch. It's just awful!

 

[mepps]

I like the editorial, but the cover is tragic.

 

[KoV]

You know those apps or websites that morph two faces into one, so you can see what your kids would look like if you got with a celeb? This looks like someone used a photo of Winona Ryder and a photo of Millie Bobby Brown and used that extremely sh*tty software to morph them together.

 

[dfl-001]

The location, styling, photography all blow.

 

[magsaddict]

I thought despite all the staff changes, the past year British MC had been quite good - either bold covers with relatively unknown models or elegant ones with actresses, but this cover is a total miss. The layout and suspect photoshopping scream amateur hour and is not worthy of the (arguably) third most important MC franchise.

 

[HeatherAnne]

I honestly don't get how a cover this bad happens...?!?!