Unique Chic

stylegurrl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
3
Unique chic sparks a no-name revolution

ALASTAIR JAMIESON
CONSUMER AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT

The Scotsman
BIG-NAME labels are going out of fashion, according to trend experts and consumers who say demand is soaring for little-known niche designers and more individual outfits.

Familiar brands such as Calvin Klein, Gucci, Jil Sander and Chanel are being shunned as fashion shoppers seek a more eclectic wardrobe by uncovering exclusive boutique stores.

The consumer boom has seen shoppers from across the social spectrum indulging in luxury clothes and accessories, partly due to contemporary society's obsession with celebrities and designer labels.

Now high-spenders are hunting the "nouveau niche" - a mixture of vintage-store bargains and top-level customised outfits that cannot be found anywhere else.

American Vogue has described the phenomenon as "dress by anonymous", and has name-checked a string of obscure designers under the heading: "Completely hush-hush: this season's top frocks".

The supermodel, Kate Moss, usually an icon of big-name fashion houses, was recently pictured wearing a yellow dress of unknown origin.

"Shoppers are more individual than ever", said the fashion writer John Davidson.

"Consumers know so much more than they did ten years ago, and they want something different, something personal.

"With mainstream labels, everyone is ending up with the same look. Wives of footballers go for the recognisable outfits because they want to be seen in them. There will always be a big market for that. But the more discerning buyer now looks for something unique."

Mr Davidson added that the current trend coincides with a period of upheaval in the fashion industry, with many famous names in disarray.

"Jil Sander clothes used to be highly sought after but she left the business and a lot of her design ethos was lost. In the 1990s, everyone went for Gucci clothes because of the cult of Tom Ford, but without him there are some characterless creations.

"There has also been a shift in manufacturing. Calvin Klein T-shirts are mass-produced. "Where is the design content in that? Why should the consumer buy them instead of the simpler and cheaper version in Zara?"

One department-store buyer went further: "What no-one dares admit is that the accessibility of designer fashions has vulgarised them," she said. "Labels risk becoming being dragged into chav territory. The solution is the anti-label - the very British business of going to enormous trouble to appear as if you've not made an effort. Look at Burberry and Prada Sport, which have become real 'football terrace' labels."

Nina Grant, who has run the Corniche boutique on Edinburgh's Jeffrey Street for 28 years, said: "Our customers have always come for the niche designers such as Yohji Yyamamoto and Comme des Garcons but demand for hard-to-find items is greater than ever. We are getting everyone from 17 to 70. Knowledgeable customers no longer find things they want in bigger shops."

The trend poses a challenge for fashion stores such as Selfridges, Jenners and Harvey Nichols, as well as department chains such as John Lewis; how to keep high-rolling customers from defecting to smaller rivals such as Edinburgh's Jane Davidson and Glasgow-based Cruise.

Harrods now offers a semi-bespoke tailoring service by designers such as Welshman Julien Macdonald so that shoppers can ensure their jacket or jeans are unique.

Harvey Nichols is introducing collections from new designers into its Edinburgh store, such as Giambattista Valli - available at only three other locations in Europe - and Sara Berman, a tiny London-based designer who manufactures only limited runs of dresses. It is also one of only 25 worldwide stores to sell Lanvin, the French couture house which makes small runs of between 15 to 70 of each dress, coat and shoe.

Averyl Oates, buying director for Harvey Nichols, said: "It seems a little tired now, when people come up to you and say 'oh you're wearing the so and so dress, I've got that'. Or indeed, worse, if you arrive at a party and someone is already there wearing it - a particularly acute problem on the Scottish social scene where many customers find themselves meeting the same people over and over.

"What is more relevant to the customer is the sense of anonymity. The more pertinent questions are 'what are you wearing?' 'who is it by?' and 'where did you get it?'."

She added: "This is about unavailability, not availability. "Even teenagers in youth clubs are looking for limited-edition sneakers, the samples that never went in to production.

"It is like editing the playlist on an Ipod - the modern buyer wants a personalised choice in the coolest of environments."

American Vogue reports on the success of previously unknown designers such as Duro Olowu whose dresses have become so popular by word of mouth that customers have flown to Britain from New York to buy one.

It says: "The anonymous dress points to the individual nature of fashion now, where knowing yourself - and the look that works best on you - is paramount."

Mr Davidson added: "Consumer is king as never before. "The prices of luxury items are down in real terms and buyers demand the best materials, the best choices of stock and the best design. The standard of input from designers has to be higher than ever."
 
Alleluia :D

Eventually big names companies will finally stop selling awfull stuff plastered with logos for chavs and Paris wanabees and get back to quality and design, even for their "cheaper" lines :wink:
 
And here's me getting worried / excited about a thread with my name! :o :lol:
 
I think that 10 years ago un less your clothes had a big label on them, or were clearly designer, you were no body, now i think people are starting to realise money doesnt buy style.

I think that people who dress in head to toe oviously designer labels, are quite insicure and they psycologicaly think that by doing this then they are better and feel better about their selves, they alsothink people will like them more. Some people are able to make a £1000 dress look cheap and horrid and some people can wear a £100 dress and look great, i think its all about how you carry and persent your self and how you piece together an outfit. My english teacher is enough to put people of designer labels for ever she weres horrid clothes that must of cost her a fortune.
In the past every one wanted to be the same and follow the crowd now people want ot do the exact opicite and walk away from the crowd and stand out. Primarily fashion is alll about atracting peoples, mostly the opicite sexes attention and by dressing uniquely thats what you do yoiu stand out and attract them

Ok im waffling now, hope I make sense lol
 
I love indie labels. I buy from a lot of punk shops and the like. Some are kind of tacky but I still love it and I can afford it.

But of course big name labels are nice every once in a while.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is the avant gardist movement really becoming mainstream? I don't think so, for every indie designer becoming mainstream, they'll be a new unknown talent waiting to be discovered, and different.....

I think that kind of philosophy has always been very important in our society through art for example. But brands such as Chanel and Gucci being snobbed? I don't think so........ For every so called nouveau mainstream offstreams, there is a label, logo obsessed woman out there....

But it's true that offstream ''so called trendsetters'' think it's cool to wear indie labels..... Which is pretty lame because I swear most of them just find what they wear weird, and think it's original compared to mainstream designers........ But look around darling, every single faux avant gardist is wearing something made by avant gardist mainstreams like Balenciaga or Tess Giberson....

How original is that?
 
UNIQUE chic being a trend..... Do you see the irony?

Not the difference btwn mainstream uniqueness and unique.......
 
That does make sense. Being unique and not following the trends to follow the trend of being unique. Really confusing isn't it. I should say that I like all designers and I don't do it for the sake of being unique.
 
Kimkhuu said:
UNIQUE chic being a trend..... Do you see the irony?

Note the difference btwn mainstream uniqueness and unique.......

so true. I think this article has good sense behind it but it was poorly written (Kate Moss was recently seen wearing a yellow dress of unknown origin-such a poor example :rolleyes:) but I think the idea behind less conspicable spending is growing.
 
I just cannot get over this. If something UNIQUE becomes trendy, then it's not unique, it is TRENDY. Trendy and unique do not go together.

No matter how unique those so called trendsetters pretend they are, they're not!
 
This is like rejecting Christina Aguilera/Jessica Simpson/Britney Spears, but going for Simple Plan, Avril Lavigne and Ashlee Simpson, because these guys are unique.

*cough*
 
But alot of those avant-gardist's who are wearing these vintage and so called avant gard designers are also carrying designer bags such as balenciagas...just so people wont think they look ridiculous in whatever weird thing they picked up from yoji and whoever else...a balenciaga bag for them is also a sense of security and status showing....Kate moss might wear vintage and lesser known labels..but she totes her balenciaga's around...and soon..if not already...everyonw knows that bag is a designer (mainstream-if i dare say)!
 
First of all Kate Moss is FAR from anything related to avant gardism. She is the best exemple of the so called unique trendsetters.

Unique is NOT Kate Moss, it has NOTHING to do with Balenciaga... Real UNIQUE is something in the lines of Mary Ping........
 
I know that..that was my point..being that the writer mentioned kate moss..although I love her..i wont call her unique...and i brought up balenciaga as an example..so chill :smile:
 
^ I know darling, my comment was just to add on more to yours..... :lol:
 
good...:smile: I always freak out when i read a sentence that starts with "first of all" haha.
 
Sorry if it confused you, English is not my mother tongue (I speak French), so I sometimes have trouble with a few words...... Thanks for pointing that though, I though first of all, meant something more like "En premier lieu" in french...... ^_^
 
First of all really isn't offensive, but people usually use it when they are angry in English, so that's probably where the confusion happened.
 
stylegurrl said:
The supermodel, Kate Moss, usually an icon of big-name fashion houses, was recently pictured wearing a yellow dress of unknown origin.
I'm sure this is nothing new.:unsure: She's been known for her 'high/low' ('this/that'?... 'whats/that'?) style from the start; it's her trademark as we speak. :blink:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,476
Messages
15,186,353
Members
86,348
Latest member
renaviale
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->