US Elle August 2015 : Margot Robbie by Cedric Buchet

[vogue28]

elle.com

 

[Miss Dalloway]

Whoa for such a gorgeous girl, Fashion magazines really have no idea how to use her, it always falls short. But when you see her on the big screen, in motion she is just a goddess!!

This does not work for me, and surprised its Cedric who shot for them, very random, but good for him!

 

[narcyza]

I don't like the styling but her make up is really sexy and I like it!

 

[jal718]

Tremendous cover shot, can't believe it's US Elle

 

[Srdjan]

This gotta be one of their best covers in a while. It's very US Vogue and even better: not crowded with texts (but crowded with hair though).

 

[MON]

Oh my goodness that hair! They should really fire whoever does the hair for their covers. That hair looks fake. I mean seriously. And the funnier thing is, the team agrees to it. What even. Her face looked like it's been attached to another woman's head!

One thing also, I wish Elle is consistent with their layout. It seems that month after month there seems to be something new to it. I'm not against reinvention, but to have it monthly, hmmm. I need uniformity and consistency from them (from quality, layout and location - will it be studio or on location?)

 

[gazebo]

She looks extremely uncomfortable, the styling makes no sense and the cropping is weird with no limbs showing. Just really bad!

 

[VogueGirl8910]

Horrerous cover, everything is awful.

 

[nataliaapple]

Hair is awful.

 

[ThatGuyPaul]

It looks like it was shot on a sweltering hot day and the camera started to fog.

 

[Luxx]

Whoa for such a gorgeous girl, Fashion magazines really have no idea how to use her, it always falls short. But when you see her on the big screen, in motion she is just a goddess!!

I agree, I have yet to see a photograph of her that really captures how absolutely gorgeous she is in motion. On screen you can't take your eyes off of her – I would love to see a photographer really capture that aspect.

 

[andypolanco]

This looks like a W cover. I dont hate it but this couldve been amazing.

 

[justaguy]

Nice cover, but just doesn't capture how really beautiful this woman is!

 

[Nomar]

I would like it so much more if they didn't ruin her hair.

 

[[J.]Oliver]

I like that they are doing something different here, but they didn't do a good job of capturing how truly stunning Margot is.

 

[Benn98]

This does not work for me, and surprised its Cedric who shot for them, very random, but good for him!

The photographer credits so far for this year:
Jan/Feb - Paola Kudacki
March/ Apr - Michael Thompson
May - Kudacki
June - Thompson
July - Liz Collins - probably their strongest cover amongst this lot.
August - Buchet

While I'll applaud them for trying new stuff, they seriously need to establish which photographer to stick with for a while. The cover moods are too scattered and inconsistent for my liking.

I still like this shot. Her hair looks exceptionally bad, which is ironic because there seems to be a 'flattering' Hair special in this issue.

 

[moussemaker]

source dailymail.com

 

[GIVENCHYlover]

So boooring

 

[GlamorousBoy]

could this cover be even worse?

 

[kokobombon]

Is that hairstyle fashionable nowadays? Lily D had the same style on her Elle cover...
still, she rarely looks good on fashion mags covers so I think this is on par.