US Harper's Bazaar March 2009 : Sarah Jessica Parker By Peter Lindbergh

[jetamielove]

In the US, it's all about celebrities. Instead, why don't they use the upcoming, or already famous models, like most other countries?

 

[Flashbang]

Do you guys like the new font they've been using on their newsstand cover? I do, I think it livens it up. It would work better if there were less words, but I cant complain, they'e not as bad as US Elle/Vogue.

yeah i like it..it's fresh

 

[helmut.newton]

I will never ever understand fashions fascination with Sarah Jessica Parker.

So what if she appeared on a fashion-y show and was STYLED by a revered stylist?!

Frankly, it makes me sick to think of all the endorsements she's made out of her character on Sex and the City. In reality - Parker is neither as stylish or as interesting as Carrie Bradshaw.

It's a travesty to let this women continue exploiting others via perfumes, clothing lines and etc. Shame on you Harpers!

 

[eneroenero]

Is SJP playing Diana Vreeland??? the light is horrible!!

 

[Franzy]

I quite like this cover. When does this come out?

 

[fiqary]

Too much photoshop.

 

[kuli_trendy]

i like the font, but SJP looks soooo young..where's those wrinkles?????? ur not young anymore!!

 

[liberty33r1b]

i love love her! so good to see her in this mag!!

 

[FashinKid90]

I'm hoping for a much less pink subscriber's cover. I do however, like the Vreeland inspiration in the ed.



Maybe her husband?

LMAO!!!..hahahahahaha

 

[cottonmouth13]

why SJP??? i hate the cover and the ed. i agree with what the others here have said, SJP is only for US Vogue. anyhow, can't wait to see what's inside. REVIEWS!!!

 

[duynk88]

both SJP and the background colors, and also the typo look fresh. This is the good start for a new season. Gud Job HB!

 

[duynk88]

they photoshopped her to look 25! wtf?!

Oh Buddy, That's their Job to make old things look better (also "best"). If she's ugly, who cares? So don't angry with Photoshop, u have to deal with it.

 

[tarsha]

I Don't Like Her But ,It's Not Such A Bad Cover As you Say

 

[homeboy]

Now when Sex and the City is done and dusted, Sarah Jessica Parker is about as purposeful as a used condom. Bad pick for a cover.

 

[Humperz]

I'm so disappointed the excitement that rush through me when i saw this thread has faded.
The cover is awful, the only presentable editorial i approve of is the one of her with the manikins.

 

[duynk88]

she's back for her new fragrances launched.

 

[indie]

nooooo.....

 

[Holland Hurrican]

I love her!!

 

[nyc_art_style]

I like the cover. SJP looks pretty, and compared to her last Vogue cover, this is beautiful The pink is a bit too loud though. I see this crayon type font is becoming popular.

I dislike the editorial though. I adore Veerland, but SJP isn't the actress or model I would choose to channel her. The hair makes SJP looks so old, and the styling is quite bad as well. As someone else mentioned before, the lighting is bad also.

However Harper's Bazaar is always amazing during big months like March and September. Therefore I'm extremely excited for the contents.

 

[coolasfcuk1010]

Damn She Looks Bbaaaddd