Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by vogue28, Oct 5, 2020.
These headlines are sloppy to me. Also not crazy about this photo. Is it pasted on top of the background?
This magazine is going to be digital next year.
How does one even take a bad photo of Gabrielle Union?! Does not compute.
Did they raid an Easter basket to find that veil?
Is she attending Marie Claire’s funeral?
Truly, truly horrible
I wouldnt mind it if it was cropped a little closer for a subscribers issue with no text.
What's the point of these digital covers? There are no digital issues you can actually flick through online, right? This is just a website article/feature, so why making a fake cover and confusing people?
WTF this looks like an elementary school student just discovered photoshop.
Could've been better
I must be looking at something different because I believe this has the makings of a great cover. Upon first look, I loved the colours and styling, how direct the photography is and the overall feel for October. Gabrielle Union isn't exactly on every fashion magazine cover either, so that's a bonus in itself.
Looking at it again, the only things bothering me are the seemingly fake background and cropping. If it was shot in black and white against a plain background and the image was zoomed in a little so the focus is only from the neck-up, this could’ve potentially turned out great.
I'm wondering the same thing. Does this mean Marie Claire is no longer in print?
I'm a big fan of Gabrielle, and while I normally turn my nose at Marie Claire, I would buy this. If it's in print.