US Vanity Fair August 2000 : Heath Ledger by Bruce Weber

Heath I thought is quite irrelevant now, why rake up the past again ?

MJ is much more relevant and will def sell more copies even tho they push back the release date a bit I thought

Disappointed with VF recently, it was Jess Simpson, now Heath at the wrong timing :unsure:

^couldn't agree more! :smile:
 
While I certainly don't think that Heath is irrelevant I do find the timing of this article to be slightly questionable. It would have been more timely to publish something like this around the anniversary of his death.

That said, this sounds like a very sort of tabloidy treatment of his life. He was an incredibly talented actor and from all accounts a very nice person, why not focus on that instead of dredging up the unpleasant past?

Not to get nostalgic but I remember the original sitting these pictures came from and Heath's first Vanity Fair cover. Freshman year of college I had them tacked to my wall :blush: There was something so exciting about him, something magnetic and unusual that made me like him right from the start. The interview was engaging and filled with little tidbits about his life, I don't usually remember celebrity interviews since they're by and large dreck but this stood out to me. I feel like once people die they should be remembered for their contributions to society rather than the tragedy surrounding their lives.

That said I admit to being vaguely interested in what is said about Michelle Williams, if only because this is all contrary to how I perceive her. I have a hard time believing that she's some harsh shrew and it seems (from this snippet) like they're attempting to blame her.

I'm sure the next cover will be Michael Jackson and something about his life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love him, but i am not interested in "Vanity Fair" version of his life, and i actually find the fact they used him for the cover like this distasteful.
 
Why him and why so long after his death? Sounds like Vanity Fair ran out of ideas for August!
 
Don't like the cover, and like most of you, i wonder why Heath... 1 year after his death, that's too late!
 
I feel like once people die they should be remembered for their contributions to society rather than the tragedy surrounding their lives.

I don't know, I find a dishonesty in that. Whatever makes a person succumb to tragedy and drama IS who they are, and I think it helps us to make sense of a person's actions to place them in a realistic context. That being said, is this article a fair representation of that drama (and therefore Heath or Michelle)? All I can say is that Heath's friends comment on Michelle's behavior and make him out to be a saint... let the shameless victimization begin! Life is never that black and white and I say if an article can't explore the gray area, why bother exploring the situation at all?
 
I don't know, I find a dishonesty in that. Whatever makes a person succumb to tragedy and drama IS who they are, and I think it helps us to make sense of a person's actions to place them in a realistic context.

I think it depends. Personally, I don't see anything dishonest in focusing on the good things about a person if that is true to their character - focusing on the good isn't tantamount to omitting the bad. My comment on how people should be remembered is more of a personal statement than something I would place on journalism - I personally look at death in that manner but with regards to reportage I think the ultimate goal is telling the truth in a tactful manner. In the end it boils down to how this article is written and what slant the author takes. From the snippet we've been provided it seems like standard fare tabloid fodder but I'll reserve judgment until it reaches print and I get to read it.

My only issue with these sorts of articles is that they can amount to very little. Its one thing to have an article that explains a persons actions its another thing to have an article that is sensationalistic and attempts to exploit death for profit. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be inquiry into his death or an exploration of his character, what I'm saying is that this all just seems a little odd. Why is VF choosing to do this now of all times and what exactly about this story makes it worthy of a cover? They've done these posthumous articles about celebrities many times but only with a few people have they given it cover space. My only hope is that they undertake this with a bit of class and do reveal something that is both poignant and truly newsworthy.
 
I wasn't interested in his private life when he was alive - and from what I see so far in this issue - I'll not be interested in the opinions of a bunch of his 'friends' talking about it, now that he's dead.

If it was a gentle tribute, or an analysis done at some distance, now that time has passed, giving a new perspective - all that would be both interesting and respectful, but I don't want to read an article with people spouting emotive nonsense and badmouthing others who might have decided to have nothing to do with this feature. The whole tragedy is crazy enough, a nightmare for his family, without adding more fuel and fire to it.
 
This is extremely random and really pointless. When did he die- like almost 2 years ago?

It is just trying to push some issues in the lazy summer days when nobody is interested in these waif-thin magazine issues to begin with... a very cheap shot.
 
Table of Contents

82 THE LAST OF HEATH With an exclusive look at Heath Ledger’s final months, Peter Biskind learns how the actor’s passion inspired Johnny Depp, Jude Law, and Colin Farrell to rescue his last movie.

90 THAT OLD SINATRA MAGIC Tony Bennett lifts his glass to his best friend and inspiration, the late, great Frank Sinatra. Photograph by Mark Seliger.


92 IT CAME FROM WASILLA Sarah Palin’s disastrous ride on the Republican ticket didn’t faze her at all. Talking to top McCain advisers, Todd S. Purdum finds that the freshest face in the G.O.P. has some of the sharpest teeth.


98 THE MAN WHO CRASHED THE WORLD Investigating the implosion of A.I.G., Michael Lewis explains how one of the world’s safest insurers became a reckless juggernaut—and a national target.


104 MAD ABOUT THE HATTER Mary Ellen Mark and Evgenia Peretz spotlight the frabjous combination of Tim Burton and Lewis Carroll.


106 RICH HARVARD, POOR HARVARD If Harvard is so smart, how come its record $36.9 billion endowment has collapsed? Nina Munk hits a campus in crisis.


112 DANGEROUS LESSONS Brigitte Lacombe and Krista Smith spotlight Eva Green, who shows her class in Jordan Scott’s debut feature, Cracks.


114 OUR LADY OF THE KITCHEN Laura Jacobs serves up the trailblazing life and legacy of America’s beloved “French” chef, Julia Child.


120 AIN’T WE GOT STYLE? Channeling John Ford and Frank Capra, V.F. re-creates Depression-era movie magic, with fashion’s top names and the summer’s top stars. Photographs by Michael Roberts, Norman Jean Roy, Mark Seliger, and Art Streiber.


FANFAIR

53 31 DAYS IN THE LIFE OF THE CULTURE


56 Krista Smith relaxes at the Annenberg beach house; nine sandwiches that hit the spot; The Cultural Divide


58 Victoria Mather seeks out the very best


62 Elissa Schappell’s Hot Type; Lisa Robinson’s Hot Tracks


63 My Stuff—Michael Smith; Dolce & Gabbana debuts a scent wardrobe; Hot Looks


Columns

68 WHAT’S A CULTURE SNOB TO DO? When all our entertainment can fit on a microchip, James Wolcott asks, how will we display our superior tastes to houseguests, fellow subway riders, and potential mates?


72 NO, PRIME MINISTER Hardly recognizing the Labour Party of his rebellious British youth, Christopher Hitchens blames embattled prime minister Gordon Brown for crushing its remaining ideals.


74 POLITICO’S WASHINGTON COUP With its über-wonky Washington reporting, Politico has captured more than six million power readers, online and in print. Michael Wolff argues that such obsession is the future of journalism. Photograph by Gasper Tringale.


77 ABE AND MR. JONES Bruce Weber and Laura Jacobs spotlight dance star Bill T. Jones, who has choreographed a tribute to Abraham Lincoln.


VANITIES

79 GORDON-LEVITTATION


80 Lawrence Levi categorizes Oeuvre Appendages; Howard Schatz captures Jeff Daniels in character


81 Out to Lunch: Denise Hale educates John Heilpern on the rules of society—including the ones she doesn’t follow


Et Cetera

40 EDITOR’S LETTER


42 CONTRIBUTORS


50 LETTERS Behind the Miracle


65 FAIRGROUND


149 CREDITS


152 PROUST QUESTIONNAIRE Tony Curtis
 
I'm sure the next cover will be Michael Jackson and something about his life.

I hope not... and only because Maureen Orth has done a major hatchet job on him already with her five previous articles.
 
^ Couldn't agree more -_- I really don't understand why they bring his death up now again - something to do with MJ recently passing away? I hope not. Either way, I don't get it. (And I also don't think they chose his best pic...)

MJ just died last week! Magazines work on issues months before they end up in print - this has nothing to do with that.
 
why is he on the cover? because of dr parnassus?

They should have put the three actors that finished the movie for him on the cover, Colin Farrell, Jude Law, and Johnny Depp.
Vanity Fair has become nothing more than a glossy tabloid with a higher price tag.

parkereloise said:
it's random but he's goregous.

Heath is super-handsome.
 
I don't understand all the hoopla, I mean the last movie he filmed (partially) is coming out soon and I'm sure the cover will sell, so what's with all disgust when it seems like a tribute to his work (with some tabloid drama thrown in of course)
 
Shouldn't they do like a Michael Jackson tribute... for something fresh/new IMO!?
 
they should've done this during the month of his death, its too...outdated. they should've put Michael Jackson or Farrah Fawcett to be updated
 
But IMO it was impossible, I think August issues are ready in May.

If they want to put Michael on VF cover soon, I think it can be for October
 
But IMO it was impossible, I think August issues are ready in May.

If they want to put Michael on VF cover soon, I think it can be for October

I agree. It would take more than a week or two to get the magazine put together and if the August issue is already hitting the newsstand, it must have been submitted to a printer weeks ago (if not months). Michael has only been gone five days.

You know there will be a MJ tribute soon. It'll be BIG!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,520
Messages
15,187,907
Members
86,406
Latest member
agro006
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->