US Vanity Fair March 2006 : Keira Knightley, Scarlett Johansson & Tom Ford by Annie Leibovitz

Is Scarlett Johansson on the cover AGAIN?
She was last year and in 2004.
Anyways, seems that it's going to be a horrible issue too.
 
cnn.com

NEW YORK (AP) -- With award season still under way, Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley are exchanging ballgowns for birthday suits.
Under the artful eye of photographer Annie Leibovitz, the starlets posed nude for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's yearly Hollywood issue, to be released Wednesday.
Fashion superstar Tom Ford also appears on the cover photo, though he stuck with a more traditional suit -- one of black fabric.
Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out.
"She did want to do it, and then when she was on the set I think she felt uncomfortable, and I didn't want to make anybody feel uncomfortable" Ford said Tuesday on ABC's "Good Morning America."
Other Hollywood stars weren't difficult to persuade, Ford said.
"A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them."
Angelina Jolie also got naked for the Hollywood issue, posing in a bathtub. Another shot depicts a fully clothed George Clooney as a director filming a large cast of women wearing skin-tone underwear.
For the cover photo, Knightley, 20, was photographed sitting sideways, with legs and arms carefully placed. The 21-year-old Johansson, draped over Ford's leg, is somewhat more exposed -- readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks.
Knightley is currently nominated for a best actress Oscar for her performance in "Pride & Prejudice." Johansson co-starred this year in Woody Allen's "Match Point."
 
I am happy for Keira, but why Johansson is again on the March cover!?
This is third time in a three years! That's too much...
 
poesy said:
What?! No naked Dakota Fanning?
:lol:

Well they (Kiera and Scarlett) both look awful on the cover, especially Kiera. It could have been a good cover if there were more actresses (naked or not, don't mind the nudity) and if we were spared Johanson's butt. Hers is gorgeous but on that empty cover it just looks tacky.
But her skin is AMAZING. :heart:
 
Hi-Res:


I'm not lovin' it. I love them all but there is something I just don't like about this image. Its trying very hard to be Helmut Newton-esque and it fails. Its a sad day when beautiful naked people do nothing for me.


Image credit: Hollywoods Best
 
omg, scarlett - beautiful face, but that butt should be hidden! god, she looks so milky and plum... not in a sexy way.
 
^ i think scarlett looks gorgeous and feminine. keira looks lovely too.
 
Just picked it up today... It's pretty thick with tons of pictures for Tom Ford's collection of actors photographed by various photographers... some naked, some vulgar or raunchy, and some quite lovely.. It's a good issue if you love Hollywood and all its aspects.
 
My parents officially think I subscribe to a p*rno mag.

Next issue better have either Jake G or Hayden Christensen on the cover, I'm so sick of naked starlets.
 
Yes, poesy and I are both disappointed there is no naked Dakota Fanning, her chest covered by Tom Ford's arm :rolleyes:
 
I don't like Kira's lips with that pout but scarlett looks va va voom!!
 
OMG what an awful cover! Keira at least looks in control (other than being oblivious to the weird gollum thing behind her) and you can't disguise her beautiful face. Scarlett on the other hand looks like she fell badly over her fat **** in a skating ring and somehow due to her dimwitted and slow reaction, her clothes froze and shattered off her. Poor Scarlett, nips stuck to the ice like that. At least she will get THE HELL OFF my TV.

Although naked Angelina inside?!? I'm buying :lol: That woman can make me buy the most dreadful magazines sometimes
 
SiennaInLondon said:
Scarlett on the other hand looks like she fell badly over her fat ****
No way does Scarlett has a fat ****. Just no way...^_^
SiennaInLondon said:
Although naked Angelina inside?!?
Can someone confirm that. :brows: (Salivating far too much for a straight girl)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gay or not, I am disgusted by the implications: one fully clothed man and two naked, barely legal young women. :angry:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,575
Messages
15,189,632
Members
86,469
Latest member
PixelPrincezz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->